 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Mechanical strength assessment of a drilled hole in the contralateral cortex at the end of the open wedge for high tibial osteotomy
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics volume 4, Article number: 23 (2017)
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to investigate, by means of finite element analysis, the effect of a drill hole at the end of a horizontal osteotomy to reduce the risk of lateral cortex fracture while performing an opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). The question was whether drilling a hole relieves stress and increases the maximum correction angle without fracture of the lateral cortex depending on the ductility of the cortical bone.
Methods
Two different types of osteotomy cuts were considered; one with a drill hole (diameter 5 mm) and the other without the hole. The drill holes were located about 20 mm distally to the tibial plateau and 6 mm medially to the lateral cortex, such that the minimal thickness of the contralateral cortical bone was 5 mm. Based on finite element calculations, two approaches were used to compare the two types of osteotomy cuts considered: (1) Assessing the static strength using local stresses following the idea of the FKMguideline, subsequently referred to as the “FKM approach” and (2) limiting the total strain during the opening of the osteotomy wedge, subsequently referred to as “strain approach”. A critical opening angle leading to crack initiation in the opposite lateral cortex was determined for each approach and was defined as comparative parameter. The relation to bone aging was investigated by considering the material parameters of cortical bones from young and old subjects.
Results
The maximum equivalent (vonMises) stress was smaller for the cases with a drill hole at the end of the osteotomy cut. The critical angle was approximately 1.5 times higher for the specimens with a drill hole compared to those without. This corresponds to an average increase of 50%. The calculated critical angle for all approaches is below 5°. The critical angle depends on the used approach, on patient’s age and assumed ductility of the cortical bone.
Conclusions
Drilling a hole at the end of the osteotomy reduces the stresses in the lateral cortex and increases the critical opening angle prior to cracking of the opposite cortex in specimen with small correction angles. But the difference from having a drill hole or not is not so significant, especially for older patients. The ductility of the cortical bone is the decisive parameter for the critical opening angle.
Background
Valgusproducing high tibial osteotomy is recognized as an effective surgical procedure for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in the presence of axial malalignment in active patients. Precise preoperative planning (Pape et al. 2004a, 2004b) and a high primary stability of the implantboneconstruct are required for a good result. An intact lateral cortical hinge is important for the stability of an opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) because fractures have been reported to cause loss of correction and poor clinical results (Agneskirchner et al. 2006; Stoffel et al. 2004; van Raaij et al. 2008; Türkmen et al. 2016; Jo et al. 2017). In order to prevent the fracture of the medial cortical hinge while performing closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO), Kessler et al. terminated the osteotomy cut with a 5mm diameter bored hole in the anteriorposterior (AP) direction; which allowed a significant increase of the correction angle compared with the same osteotomy without a drill hole (Kessler et al. 2002). The present study aimed to investigate mechanically the effect of such a potentially stress relieving drill hole in the AP direction at the end of the horizontal osteotomy cut while performing an OWHTO by comparing the static strength of the lateral cortical bone in cases of osteotomies with or without a drill hole. Two approaches were used to achieve this objective: (1) Assessing the static strength using local stresses following the ideas of the FKM guidelines “Analytical Strength Assessment of Components”, commonly known as the FKM guidelines (Rennert et al. 2012), and (2) limiting the total strain to the elongation at break during the opening of the osteotomy wedge. FKM is an abbreviation of the german expression "Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau" (Rennert et al. 2012). The first approach was designated “FKM approach” and the second “strain approach”. Both approaches rely on nonlinear finite element analyses. The assessment was based on crack initiation only, hence complete rupture and dislocation was not investigated here. To our knowledge, no study investigated so far the mechanical effect of a drill hole in medial HTO. Does a drill hole at the end of the osteotomy cut increase the correction angle without fracture of the lateral cortical hinge in high tibial osteotomy? It was hypothesised that in spite of drilling a hole and significant stress relief crack initiation takes place between 2 and 5° depending on the bone ductility.
Methods
Specimens
Two different types of osteotomy cuts were considered; one with a drill hole (diameter 5 mm) and the other without the hole. The osteotomy cut had a thickness of 2 mm. The starting point of the horizontal osteotomy was located on the medial side at 35 mm distally to the tibia plateau and the end point was located in the lateral cortical bone at 20 mm distally to the tibia plateau and 6 mm from the lateral cortex. The minimal thickness of the contralateral cortical bone was 5 mm. Two types of drill holes were considered: one directly at the end of the osteotomy cut as an extension and the second also at the end of the osteotomy, but above it. The drill holes were located about 20 mm distally to the tibial plateau and 6 mm medially to the lateral cortex. The specimen without hole or “Specimen with No Hole” has been designated by the abbreviation SNH (Fig. 1). The “Specimen With the Hole as an Extension” of the osteotomy cut has been called SWHE (Fig. 2) while the second “With the Hole located Above” of the osteotomy cut has been designated SWHA (Fig. 3).
The software HyperMesh (Altair Engineering, Inc., Antony, France) was used to generate the 3D geometries of the specimens from the mesh of the finite element model of the Lower Limb Model for Safety (Beillas et al. 2001). This mesh was developed using the stateofart procedure of 3D geometries acquisition from medical computer tomography (CT) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data collected on a subject close to a 50th percentile male. The obtained geometry of the tibia was then imported in Autodesk Inventor (Autodesk, Inc., Neuchâtel, Switzerland) to model the osteotomy cut and the drilled hole. The finite element calculations were performed with Ansys Workbench (Ansys, Inc., Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, U.S.A).
All three specimens were designed with the same minimal thickness of the contralateral cortical of exactly 5 mm in order to keep the highly stressed material volume identical or at least as comparable as possible. The specimen SWHA has been compared to the specimen SWHE in order to check if the location of the drill hole is of importance. The drill hole of specimen SWHA was located 2.5 mm proximally to the one of specimen SWHE.
Two dimensional (2D) and three dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) were performed. For the 2D analyses, a section along the frontal plane of each of the three tibias was considered, and an offset of 10 mm from that section was made to build 2D geometries of the three specimens.
Assessment of the static strength using local stresses: “FKM approach”
The components static strength (σ _{ SK }) of the lateral cortex of the tibia were assessed following the ideas of the FKMguideline for metals (Rennert et al. 2012) though it is normally only used for steel and aluminium. Therefore some key equations are repeated subsequently.
The relevant section factor n _{ pl } characterises the load bearing reserve up to a critical state of the specimen, once the elastic limit load has been exceeded by means of the permissible partial or total plasticisation of thecomponent crosssections. R _{ e } is the yield strength.
The critical value of total strain ε _{ ertr } characterises the deformation reserve and depends on the elongation at break and on the degree of multiaxiality h of the stresses.
where ε _{0} = R _{ e }/E is the minimum of the critical strain at high multiaxiality and the reference strain ε _{ ref } is related to the elongation at break A, which depends on material ductility, namely
The degree of multiaxiality is calculated by means of principal stresses at the reference point, i.e. the critical point to be assessed with maximum equivalent (vonMises) stress.
where σ _{ H } = (σ _{1} + σ _{2} + σ _{3})/3 is the hydrostatic stress and σ _{ V } the equivalent (vonMises) stress
with σ _{1}, σ _{2} and σ _{3} being the principal stresses.
The local stresses were estimated by performing linear static FEA of opening the osteotomy cut by 10° because this value was considered as a median of the correction angles applied for HTO.
The factor K _{ p } characterises the load bearing reserve from the first yielding at the reference point (the elastic limit load (ELL)) up to the plastic limit load (PLL). It is hence defined as the ratio of PLL to ELL.
The PLL was estimated by performing nonlinear FEA with the cortical bone as an ideal elastic–plastic material (Fig. 7). The osteotomy cut was opened until a horizontal tangent in the load–displacement diagram was reached i.e. an increasing deformation did no longer require increasing load; At this level the PLL was reached. The ELL is the load, which is achieved when the combined stress according to Eq. (8) at the reference point corresponds to the yield stress, which was determined in a linear FEA. The osteotomy cut is opened until the combined stress is equal to the yield stress.
The used failure criterion assumed that the specimen failed when the assessed static strength ( σ _{ SK }) exceeded the existing combined stress. Relying on the FKM guidelines, the used combined stress is based for ductile material on the von Mises yield criterion and isgiven by Eq. (6). For semiductile and brittle materials the combined stress is a linear combination of the von Mises stress (σ _{ GH }) and the combined stress based on the normal stress hypothesis (σ _{ NH }):
The weighting factor q is between 0 and 1 and depends on the ductility. Here it was chosen once as q = 0 for ductile and once as q = 1 for the cortical bone considered as a semiductile material having an elongation at break A in the same order of magnitude than grey cast iron (between 3 and 8%). The combined stress according to the normal stress hypothesis is given by
The failure load and its corresponding critical opening angle were hence reached when the existing combined stress at the reference point according to Eq. (8) reached the static strength σ _{ SK } based on a linear elastic calculation. The following flowchart (Fig. 4) sketches, for a better comprehension, the procedure of the static strength assessment that has been described.
Determination of the total strain during opening of the osteotomy wedge: “Strain approach”
The total strain of the specimen was determined by means of finite element analyses of the different specimens by considering a nonlinear behaviour for the cortical bone and opening of the osteotomy cut by 10°.
The failure criterion in case of the strain approach was based on the total strain obtained from nonlinear finite element calculations. If the calculated total strain was reaching the elongation at break A from experimental material testing, then the specimen failed. In the numerical simulation the osteotomy gap was opened and the opening angle of reaching the critical strain value (A) was hence the critical opening angle.
Material behaviour of the cortical bone
Literature review
Average values of the strength properties of the cortical bone were found in the literature and are summarised in Table 1. The maximum yield (Re) and ultimate tensile (σ _{ ult }) strength of the cortical bone of the femur are 114 MPa and 135 MPa respectively, while the maximum elongation at break is A = ε _{ ult } = 3.1% .
Only Reilly and Burstein (1975) related ultimate shear and compression strengths to age (Table 2).
Figure 5 shows stress–strain curves of compact bone tissue from the femur for different age groups (Vinz 1975). The values in the table near the figure were read from the curves. It should be noted that the values of the elongation at break ε _{ ult } from this study (Vinz 1975) are extremely small (below 1%) compared to other authors.
Ott et al. published more recently an agerelated study of tensile properties of the cortical bone (Ott 2007; Ott et al. 2010). These authors used the experimental results published by McCalden et al. (1993) to construct agerelated constitutive laws of human cortical bone (Fig. 6). The values of the strain published by Ott et al. are very large compared to the values published by Vinz in 1975 (Vinz 1975).
A study varying the patient’s age has been performed by considering the material parameters of the cortical bone of the youngest (20–29 years) and the oldest (more than 80 years) patients from the study by Ott (Ott 2007; Ott et al. 2010). The youngest (20–29 years) and oldest (more than 80 years) patients were chosen to consider a maximum variation. The mean values (Table 2) of the tensile strength properties of the cortical bone published by Reilly and Burstein (1975) have also been considered; these were the highest values found in the literature with a mean YOUNG modulus of about 17000 MPa. The study was therefore subdivided into three cases, depending on the material properties of the cortical bone. These values were considered for the 2D and 3D finite element calculations as indicated in Table 3. A Poisson’s ratio of 0.3 was used for the present study. Due to the lack of agerelated material parameters of the trabecular bone, and for sake of simplicity, the tibia was considered as cortical bone only.
All the material parameters that were chosen to be used in the present study were retrieved from the experimental studies of Reilly and Burstein (1975) and McCalden et al. (1993). The authors of these two experimental studies stated that the bones were thawed (Reilly and Burstein 1975) or kept moist (McCalden et al. 1993) during testing.
Material parameters used for FKM approach
The stress state at the reference point with maximum combined stress (vonMises) is decisive for the assessment of the static strength (Rennert et al. 2012). Ideal bilinear elastic–plastic stress–strain curves (Fig. 7) were used to estimate the PLL, assuming that the curves continue nearly horizontally to an infinite strain value and were not ending at 4%, as shown as example in Fig. 7. In the elastic domain the curve was defined by the Young’s modulus (E) and a fictitious yield stress taken as the mean value of the real yield stress and the ultimate stress σ _{ y } = (Re + σ _{ ult })/2. The tangent modulus has been chosen as E _{ T } = 0.001 ⋅ E according to the FKMguidelines (Rennert et al. 2012) and was hence nearly horizontal or ideal plastic. The maximal average strength curve was defined by simply using the mean values of the Table 2.
According to FKM and Eq. (4), ε _{ ref } is different for ductile (elongation at break A ≥ 6%) and for semiductile material (A < 6%). The values of elongation at break A of the cortical bone from literature are smaller than 4%; this means that the cortical bone should be considered as semiductile according to this norm. But as the FKMnorm is conservative and addresses steel and aluminium only, hence the ductile material case was additionally investigated for reasons of comparison. The value of 6% was chosen for the elongation at break of the cortical bone considered as ductile. Therefore both material behaviours were taken into account while performing the FKM approach as indicated in Table 4.
Material parameters used for strain approach
The multilinear true stress  strain curves (Fig. 8) were approximated by considering the values of tensile properties of the cortical bone from the study by Ott (Ott 2007; Ott et al. 2010). The highest average strength curve was defined by using the mean tensile strength values from (Reilly and Burstein 1975) by choosing points in order to reproduce the evolution of stress–strain curves of the material behaviour of the cortical bone. The true stress (σ _{ T }) in the tensile test is the instantaneous applied load divided by the instantaneous crosssectional area of the considered specimen. The engineering stress or stress (σ) is given by the quotient of the applied load to the original crosss ectional area of the considered specimen. The engineering strain or strain (ε) is the total elongation divided by the initial length of the considered specimen. The true stress ( σ _{ T }) is related to the stress (σ) by the relation σ _{ T } = σ ⋅ (1 + ε) and the true strain (ε _{ T }) to the engineering strain (ε) by the relation ε _{ T } = ln(1 + ε).
Different numerical simulations performed
2D and 3D FEA were performed. For each of analysis type, in total 27 numerical simulations were done for the 3 chosen constitutive material laws (case H, M and L), for the 3 different analysed specimens according to Figs. 1, 2 and 3, and for the 3 assumptions: strain approach, semiductility and ductility for FKM approach according to FKMguideline.
The mesh of the 2D models consisted of quadrilateral elements with a size of 0.5 mm. The 3D models were meshed with tetrahedral solid elements. The mesh size of the 3D models depended on the material behaviours that were considered. For linear analyses a fine mesh size varying between 0.2 and 2 mm was used in the vicinity of the hole at the end of the osteotomy open wedge, and a mesh size varying between 2 and 5 mm was used to mesh the rest of the tibia. For nonlinear analyses the mesh size of the region in the vicinity of the hole at the end of the osteotomy open wedge was 1 mm, and the mesh size of the rest of the tibia varied between 1 and 5 mm.
Results
Results following the FKM approach
Reference point and principal stresses
The stress distributions after performing static linear analysis of opening the osteotomy cut by 10° were similar for any specimen independently of the case study (Table 3). The equivalent (vonMises) stresses obtained for the case H are depicted in Fig. 9 for the 2Danalysis and in Figs. 10, 11 and 12 for the 3Danalysis.
The maximum values of the equivalent (vonMises) and principal stresses for the 2D linear FEA are summarized in Table 5.
For the 2D FEA the maximum equivalent (vonMises) stress was located at the tip of the osteotomy cut of the specimen SNH. The corresponding value was smaller for specimens with a drill hole at the end of the osteotomy cut (specimens SWHE and SWHA in Table 5). The specimen SWHE showed the smallest maximum. This means that drilling a hole at the end of the osteotomy cut reduces the stress in the contralateral cortical.
The middle and the minimal principal stresses were zero, meaning that the stress at the reference point was uniaxial in the first principal direction (vector X in the enlargement of Fig. 9). The maximum principal stresses were all positive, indicating that the stress state at the reference point was tension (Table 5).
According to the linear 3D FEA the maximum equivalent (vonMises) stress was located at the tip of the notch more on the inside of the osteotomy cut. The maximum values of the principal equivalent stresses are summarised in Table 6. As observed for the 2D analysis, the maximum was smaller in the cases with a drill hole, while the differences between SWHA and SWHE were very small and not relevant. The maximum and the middle principal stresses at the reference points were positive, indicating that the stress state at the reference points was twodimensional tension. The minimum principal stress was zero, meaning that the stressstate at the reference point was plane (vector X and Y in the enlargement of Figs. 10, 11 and 12).
Factor K _{ p } characterizing the load bearing reserve up to the PLL
The values of ELL were estimated with the previous linear FEA that were used to determine the local stresses at the reference point. Nonlinear 2D and 3D FEA were performed using the different bilinear material models of the case studies H, M and L of Fig. 7. The osteotomy cut was opened until a horizontal tangent in the load–displacement diagram was reached (PLL), as shown in the examples depicted in Fig. 13. The factor K _{ p } was calculated according to Eq. (7) and summarised with the values of the PLL and ELL in Table 7 for the 2D FEA and Table 8 for the 3D FEA.
The factor K _{ p } was higher for specimens SNH, because the yield stress in its contralateral cortical was reached at the lower load level in linear FEA compared to the specimens with drill holes.
The degree of multiaxiality h, the critical value of total strain ε _{ ertr } and the factor \( \left(\sqrt{\ E{\varepsilon}_{e rtr}/{R}_e}\right) \)
The values of the degree of multiaxiality h and the critical total strain ε _{ ertr } calculated in accordance with Eqs. (3) and (5) respectively, considering the material parameters of Table 4, are summarised together with the values of the factor \( \left(\sqrt{E{\varepsilon}_{e rtr}/{R}_e}\right) \) in Table 9 (for the cortical bone considered as semiductile material) and in Table 10 (for the cortical bone considered as ductile material).
The relevant factor n _{ pl }, the specimen static strength σ _{ SK } and the critical opening angle α_{crit}
Table 11 (cortical bone considered as semiductile) and Table 12 (cortical bone considered as ductile) list the values of the relevant factor n _{ pl } calculated according to Eq. (2) by considering the values of the notch factor K _{ p } (Table 7 and Table 8) and the factor \( \sqrt{E{\varepsilon}_{e rtr}/{R}_e} \) (Table 9 and Table 10), the static strength σ _{ SK } calculated in accordance with Eq. (1) and the critical opening angle α_{crit} reached in the linear finite elements calculations when the relevant combined stress according to Eq. (8) reached σ _{ SK }.
For any case (H, M or L) the critical angle was higher for specimens with drill hole (SWHE and SWHA) than for specimens without. For all specimens the critical angle decreases when we go from case study M (young patients) to case study L (old patients) with the lower ultimate strength.
Figures 14 and 15 recapitulate the critical angles obtained by using the FKM approach assuming semiductile and ductile material behaviour respectively.
The differences between the 2 and the 3dimensional finite element analyses were less than 10% on average and hence, were not important. The constitutive material behaviour however is very important, as the critical opening angle α_{crit} was 1.1° on average for semiductile (Table 11 and Fig. 14) and 2.3° on average for ductile material (Table 12 and Fig. 15). Both angles were still quite small compared to real angles during surgery.
Results using the strain approach
The maximum equivalent total strain for all specimens was located in the contralateral cortex when an opening the osteotomy gap was performed. Figures 16, 17 and 18 show for instance the total equivalent strain in the specimens for case study L, i.e. patients older than 80 years. The cortical bone was considered to behave nonlinearly according to the stress–strain curves in Fig. 8.
The following graphs shown in Figs. 19 and 20 indicate the total strain in function of the opening angle for the 2D FEA and the 3D FEA respectively.
Studying Figs. 19 and 20 it turned out that the total strain obtained with 2D FEA increased faster than in 3D FEA, which resulted in smaller critical angles using the 2D FEA. Furthermore, the specimens without a hole (SNH) yielded more quickly than those with a hole (SWHE, SWHA).
Table 13 summarises the critical angles obtained when the total strain reached the elongation at break A. Figure 21 gives a recapitulative comparative diagram of all determined critical angles.
For any specimen the critical angle decreased with the elongation at break corresponding to an increasing of the age of the patient increases (Fig. 21). The highest values were obtained for case M, i.e. young adults with highest elongation at break A = 3.7%. The elongation at break A (i.e. the ductility of the material) was more important than its strength, as can be seen by comparing case H (Tensile strength R _{ e } = 114 MPa and A = 3.1%) and case M (Tensile strength R _{ e } = 80 MPa and A = 3.7%). The maximal critical angle of 4.5°obtained for young patients (case M) is approximately the double of that for old patients (case L).
The FKM approach with semiductile material (A < 6%) and the strain approach with the more realistic 3D FEA were chosen for final comparison. The critical angles are shown in Fig. 22.
It became clear that FKM approach is more conservative, which appeared natural for a norm intended for strength assessment. Furthermore, all correction angles above 4.5° would lead to crack initiation in the contralateral cortex, even if the more generous strain approach was chosen for design criterion.
Discussion
One key finding of the study was that drilling a hole at the end of the osteotomy reduces the stresses in the contralateral cortex and increases the opening angle prior to cracking by maximal 65%. The other key finding was that all calculated absolute angles prior to crack initiation were below 5° and hence small, leading to the presumption that at least cracking, but probably also full rupture, takes place in nearly all cases with correction angles above 5°.
Three different specimens have been used: a specimen without a drill hole (SNH), a specimen with a drill hole centrically in line with, and at the end of, the osteotomy (SWHE) and a specimen with the drill hole located at the proximal end of the osteotomy (SWHA). The simulated surgical technique and the geometric characteristics of the osteotomy height, obliquity and minimal distance to the opposite cortex was the same for all specimens.
Three material cases have been considered to reflect the physical variety depending mainly on the age of the patients. Case H was designed with the highest mean strength values found in literature. For cases M and L the material parameters used were those of young (20–29 years) and old (more than 80 years) patients respectively. While using the FKM approach, the cortical bone was considered firstly as semiductile and secondly as ductile following the differentiation proposed by the FKMguidelines (Rennert et al. 2012). The ductile material assumption was made only to highlight this influence on the assessed strength.
2D and 3D FEA were performed. The load applied consisted of a continuous opening (10°) of the osteotomy gap. Regardless of the analysis type, the stress concentration was located in the zone near to the tip of the osteotomy cut. The maximum equivalent (vonMises) stress was smaller for specimens with a drill hole at the end of the osteotomy cut.
The reference stress at the hotspot was comparable for specimens SWHE and SWHA (Table 5 and Table 6). This means that any of the SWHE and SWHA specimens can be considered in order to reduce the stress in the opposite cortex. The maximum value of the critical opening angle was obtained for specimen SWHE, meaning that drilling the hole as an extension of the osteotomy cut is optimal, though the differences to SWHA are small.
The specimens with a hole (SWHE, SWHA) yielded more slowly than those with no hole (SNH). This means that the hole enlarges the volume of highly charged material and hence leads to a smaller strain for a given opening angle or in larger values for the critical angle.
For all specimens the critical angle leading to crack initiation decreased when the patient age increased. The absolute difference between the critical angle of the specimens with a drill hole and the specimens with no hole decreased with the patient age. This means that drilling a hole in order to reduce the critical angle is more advantageous in case of young patients. This is correlated to the fact that the cortical bone of old patients is less ductile. By comparing the results obtained with the FKM approach of semiductile (Fig. 14) and of ductile (Fig. 15) material it becomes clear that ductility is the decisive parameter. This fact was also observed by using the strain approach, where maximum values for the critical angles were obtained for case study M, where elongation at break was highest (Fig. 6).
In specimens with larger correction angles exceeding approximately 4.5° cracks are initiated and material segregation is started even with relative ductile bone behaviour, i.e. in case of younger patients. Large correction angles hence always lead at least to microcracking in the zone of the tip of the osteotomy cut. The clinical relevance of microcracking in the zone of the tip of the osteotomy cut was not investigated here. In case of older people with reduced ductility and strength of the cortical bone, the cracking starts earlier, i.e. at smaller angles.
The assessment was based on crack initiation only and hence complete dislocation was not investigated here. But as the wall thickness from the drilled hole to the outer surface of the bone is small, it can be concluded by simple engineering reasoning that complete rupture of the opposite cortex follows soon after crack initiation. These data suggest that the hinge pin offers no relevant benefit for the treatment of malalignment since the need for correction in patients with varus alignment is frequently above 8° of correction. It is well documented that the risk of revarisation in the presence of the opposite cortex fracture increases with every degree of valgus correction (Pape et al. 2004a, 2004b). Obviously, the current study suggests that the cortexpreserving hinge pin effect is absent in larger corrections exceeding 5°. This observation is confirmed in an experimental study by Reyle et al. (2017), which used human cadaver tibial bone, artificial Synbones and Sawbones to investigate the fracture of the lateral hinge in an openwedge HTO with and without a hinge pin.
Seemingly, it is difficult to determine the validity of biomechanical experiments done in the absence of muscular support and power. In this laboratory setting, the definition of a fracture of the opposite cortex followed an “allornothing principle” due to the used underlying numerical model. Moreover, differences between the critical angles are small and it could be concluded that there is no significant difference between the specimens. The cortical bone has been considered as homogenous, isotropic linear elastic or elasticideal plastic, and the results obtained are based only on numerical calculations in ideal situations, which should eventually be completed with experimental studies. Furthermore, the method used for the FKM approach is normally dedicated to steel, aluminium and their alloys. Considering the tibia head as composed only of cortical bone constitutes another limitation of the present study. Hence, caution is required when transferring the results of this study to clinical settings.
In clinical practice, the definition of a fracture of the opposite cortex is less precise unless a true dislocation and separation of the two cortices are apparent on intraoperative fluoroscopy. (Staubli 2008) found in her significant number of osteotomy patients multiple small fissures, bone bruises without an apparent fracture on intraoperative fluoroscopic images.
Obviously, the capacity for maintaining bony stability in the presence of (multiple) cortex fissures can vary significantly among patients and bone stability does not allow an “allornothing principle”. Nevertheless, the data of the present study indicate that a correctly placed hinge pin at the end of the horizontal and ascending tibial osteotomy does not prevent opposite cortex fracture in larger corrections. The data suggest that bone ductility is an important factor for the crack initiation and hence integrity of opposite cortex, especially for higher corrections.
Conclusions
The current study suggests that the drill hole (hinge pin) at the end of the horizontal osteotomy reduces the stresses in the contralateral cortex and hence increases the critical opening angle prior to cracking of the opposite cortex in specimen with small correction angles. But the difference from having a drill hole or not is not so significant, especially for older patients. The ductility of the cortical bone is the decisive parameter for the calculated critical opening angle. Transferred to clinical practice, these data suggest that the hinge pin is an asset, but not the decisive parameter, and it cannot avoid cracking and rupture of the opposite cortex in cases of larger correction angles.
Abbreviations
 2D FEA:

Two dimensional finite element analysis
 2D:

Two dimensional
 3D FEA:

Three dimensional finite element analysis
 3D:

Three dimensional
 AP:

Anterior posterior
 COWHTO:

Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy
 ELL:

Elastic limit load
 FEA:

Finite element analysis
 FKM:

“Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau”
 OA:

Osteoarthritis
 OWHTO:

Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy
 PLL:

Plastic limit load
 SNH:

Specimen without hole
 SWHA:

Specimen with the drill hole at the end of the osteotomy a little bit above
 SWHE:

Specimen with the drill hole at the end of the osteotomy cut as an extension
References
Agneskirchner JD, Freiling D, Hurschler C, Lobenhoffer P (2006) Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:291–300
Beillas P, Begeman PC, Yang KH, King AI, Arnoux PJ, Kang HS, Kayvantash K, Brunet C, Prasad P (2001) Lower Limb: Advanced FE Model and New Experimental Data. Stapp Car Crash J 45:469–494
Evans FG (1976) Mechanical Properties and Histology of Cortical Bone from Younger and Older Men. Anat Rec 185:1–12
Jo HS, Park JS, Byun JH, Lee YB, Choi YL et al. (2017) The effects of different hinge positions on posterior tibial slope in medial openwedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc:1–8. doi:10.1007/s0016701745266
Kessler OC, Jacob HA, Romero J (2002) Avoidance of medial cortical fracture in high tibial osteotomy: improved technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395:180–185
MatWeb. Online Materials Information Ressource. http://www.matweb.com. Acessed 15 Jun 2016
McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, CourtBrown CM (1993) Agerelated changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1193–1205
Ott I (2007) Ein Materialgesetz zur Beschreibung des Alterungsprozesses kortikaler Knochen. Dissertation, Staatsund Universitätsbibliothek Bremen, Bremen
Ott I, Kienzler R, Schröder R (2010) Aging in the cortical bone: a constitutive law and its application. Arch Appl Mech 80:527–541
Pape D, Adam F, Rupp S, Seil R, Kohn D (2004a) Stabilität, Knochenheilung und Korrrekturverlust nach valgisierender Tibiakopfumstellung: Eine Röntgenstereometrieanalyse. Orthopade 33:208–217
Pape D, Seil R, Adam F, Rupp S, Kohn D, Lobenhoffer P (2004b) Bildgebung und präoperative Planung der Tibiakopfosteotomie. Orthopade 33:122–134
Reilly DT, Burstein AH (1975) The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8:393–405
Rennert R, Kullig E, Vormwald M, Esderts A, Siegele D et al (2012) FKM Guideline: Analytical strength assessment of components. VDMA Verlag, Darmstadt
Reyle G, Lorbach O, Diffo Kaze A, Pape D (2017) Verhinderung einer Fraktur der Gegenkortikalis bei aufklappender Osteotomie. Orthopade : 1–7. doi:10.1007/s0013201734182
Staubli AE (2008) Radiological examination of bone healing after openwedge tibial osteotomy. In: Lobenhoffer P, van Heerwaarden RJ, Staubli AE, Jacobs WC (eds) Osteotomies around the knee. Thieme. AO Foundation Publishing, Stuttgart, pp 131–146
Stoffel K, Stachowiak G, Kuster M (2004) Open wedge high tibial osteotomy: biomecanical investigation of the modified Arthrex Osteotomy Plate (Puddu Plate) and the TomoFix Plate. Clin Biomech 19:944–950
Türkmen F, Kaçıra BK, Özkaya M et al. (2016) Comparison of monoplanar versus biplanar medial openingwedge high tibial osteotomy techniques for preventing lateral cortex fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc: 1–7. doi:10.1007/s0016701640496
van Raaij TM, Brouwer RW, de Vlieger R, Reijman M, Verhaar AN (2008) Opposite cortical fracture in high tibial osteotomy: lateral closing compared to the medial openingwedge technique. Acta Orthop 79:508–514
Vinz H (1975) Change in the mechanical properties of human compact bone upon aging. Polymer Mechanics 11:568–571
Yamada H (1970) Strength of Biological Materials. Williams and Wilkins Co, Baltimore
Acknowledgements
Stefan Maas and Dietrich Pape are partners in the project “Experimentelle und klinische Orthopädie der Großregion/Orthopédie Expérimentale et Clinique de la Grande Région” from the Universität der Großregion/Université de la Grande Région (UGR), supported by the INTERREG IV Programme of the European Union.
Authors’ contributions
All authors have contributed to writing and correcting this manuscript. ADK: Principal author, performing the calculations, analysing the results, writing the manuscript. SM: analysing the results, writing the manuscript. AH: Collecting material parameters, writing the manuscript. DP: analysing the results, writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Diffo Kaze, A., Maas, S., Hoffmann, A. et al. Mechanical strength assessment of a drilled hole in the contralateral cortex at the end of the open wedge for high tibial osteotomy. J EXP ORTOP 4, 23 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s4063401700980
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s4063401700980