- Open Access
The role of the medial plate for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a comparative mechanical study using two fixations with cannulated screws
© The Author(s). 2019
- Received: 11 December 2018
- Accepted: 4 April 2019
- Published: 2 May 2019
The biomechanical behavior of Pauwels type III fractures should be taken into consideration when performing internal fixation, since this repair should resist the shear force inherent in the vertical fracture line to the greatest extent possible. Recently, the use of a small fragment plate on the medial face of the femoral neck has been proposed by some authors, with satisfactory initial results. In the current study we analyze the mechanical role a medial plate used as a buttress plate for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, comparing the resistance of two fixation configurations using three cannulated screws.
Pauwels type III fractures were simulated in synthetic bones models and two groups were created, one of those using two parallel screws at the bottom of the femoral neck and the third screw crossing the fracture horizontally (G1), and the other fixed in the same arrangement as G1, but with the addition of a medial side plate at the apex of the fracture (G2).
The constructs were subjected to axial loading until catastrophic failure.
The addition of a medial plate buttressing the femoral neck increased significantly the resistance to maximum loading (p = 0.003).
Use of a medial buttress plate results in a mechanically superior construction for Pauwels type III fractures fixed with multiple cannulated screws.
Lebel of evidence
Level IV. Biomechanical comparative study.
- Femoral neck fracture
- Pauwels classification
- Biomechanical testing
- Medial plate
- Multiple cannulates screws
Fixation of femoral neck fractures is associated with a higher incidence of complications than any other fracture (Estrada et al., 2002). Initial deviation of the fracture occurs in up to two thirds of cases, leading to complications such as non-union, osteonecrosis (ON), and collapse of the femoral head, mainly through interruption of vascular supply. This is more critical in the young adult population, where preservation of the femoral head is the rule (Estrada et al., 2002; Panteli et al., 2015; Damany et al., 2005). Beyond initial deviation, other characteristics such as posterior fragmentation of the femoral neck and Pauwels type III fracture increase the risk that complications will occur and that additional procedures will be necessary (Panteli et al., 2015). Careful evaluation and preoperative planning are important, because fixation failure in young adults is associated with high morbidity and is difficult to solve (Estrada et al., 2002; Panteli et al., 2015; Damany et al., 2005; Shen et al., 2016).
The occurrence of more vertical fractures in the femoral neck, classified as Pauwels type III fracture, is very frequent in young adults, usually after high-energy trauma (Shen et al., 2016). The geometry of the fracture line has been shown to depend on the energy of the injury and patient age (Panteli et al., 2015; Basso et al., 2012). Shear forces are dominant in this type of fracture, resulting in the deviation and collapse of the proximal end of the femur in varus (Shen et al., 2016). The biomechanical behavior of Pauwels type III fractures should be taken into consideration when performing internal fixation, since this repair should resist the shear force inherent in the vertical fracture line to the greatest extent possible (Panteli et al., 2015; Shen et al., 2016; Gümüstas et al., 2014). Several studies have suggested that the ideal osteosynthesis for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures should consider this characteristic, although no consensus has been reached on the best type of fixation.
Today, fixation using three cannulated screws with diameters of larger than 6.0-mm is most commonly recommended to treat femoral neck fractures, since it provides the best axial and torsional stiffness, resulting in improved failure strength (Asnis, 1985; Augat et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2013; Zdero et al., 2010). However, in Pauwels type III fractures this type of construction generates not only compressive forces but also shear forces, which increases the risk of deviation between the fragments and collapse in varus (Shen et al., 2016). Adverse outcomes have been observed in 20% to 48% of patients who undergo this type of fixation (Filipov, 2011). New arrangements employing multiple cannulated screws or a sliding hip screw system have been studied in the literature to manage this fracture pattern, although no consensus has been reached (Panteli et al., 2015; Augat et al., 2019; Filipov, 2011; Luttrell et al., 2014; Nowotarski et al., 2012). More recently, the use of a small fragment plate on the medial face of the femoral neck has been proposed by some authors, with satisfactory initial results (Mir & Collinge, 2015; Ye et al., 2017). In theory, by adding a medial plate to buttress a Pauwels type III would transform shearing forces in compressive forces.
In this present study, the authors compared two forms of fixation for Pauwels type III fractures using cannulated screws: two parallel screws at the bottom of the femoral neck with a third screw horizontally crossing the fracture (widely known as the Pauwels screw), and the use of a small fragment plate in the medial portion of the femoral neck combined with cannulated screws in the same arrangement as described above. The objective of this study was to use an experimental model with synthetic bones to determine the biomechanical stability of these two arrangements in fixation for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. Hypothetically we assume that the addition of a medial plate displays higher stability than a construction with multiple cannulated screws.
A total of 10 synthetic bone models of the right femur (model 2240, Synbone, Switzerland) were used; these were 465.0 mm long, with a condylar width of 86.0 mm, femoral neck angle of 135° and 15° of anteversion, femoral head diameter of 48.0 mm, and medullary canal diameter of 9.5 mm. The bones were divided into two equal groups: group 1 (G1), which had Pauwels type III fractures fixated using two parallel screws at the bottom of the femoral neck and the third screw crossing the fracture horizontally (the Pauwels screw), and group 2 (G2), which had Pauwels type III fractures fixated in the same arrangement as G1, but with the addition of a medial side plate at the apex of the fracture.
A goniometer was used to create osteotomy lines at a 70° angle on the testing specimens in the middle third of the femoral neck, reproducing a Pauwels type III fracture (Shen et al., 2016). Before the osteotomy was created, the guide wires for the cannulated screws were introduced using fluoroscopy according to the fixation assembly used in the two experimental groups in order to facilitate reduction and fixation after the bone was cut. The wires were removed and an oscillating saw was used to cut the femoral necks according to the osteotomy lines which had been drawn, working from back to front until just before the anterior cortex was reached. The osteotomy was completed manually so that after reduction there would be anatomical contact with the anterior cortex of the synthetic bone.
Next, the osteotomy was anatomically reduced and the wires were repositioned in the holes which were made initially. A cannulated drill was used only in the lateral cortex of the femur and 7.0 mm self-tapping cannulated screws were introduced over the guide wires until they reached 5.0 mm from the articular surface of the femoral head. Washers were not used. Interfragmentary compression of the osteotomy was created using the two inferior screws, and subsequently the Pauwels screw was introduced. This latter cannulated screw was positioned centrally in the plane of the femoral neck, located in the posterior and anterior neck of the femur (Gurusamy et al., 2005).
For the mechanical test, the specimens were cut in the shaft region, resulting in a final size of 200.0 mm, according to the protocol described previously by the authors (Giordano et al., 2018).
We used a Flextest 40 MTS model 810 device (Materials Testing System, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) with a 100.0 kN capacity, using a 10.0 kN capacity load cell calibrated and measured by the Mechanical Testing Laboratory in the Department of Manufacturing and Materials Engineering at the School of Mechanical Engineering.
Load application system
Step 1: until displacement of 5.0 mm was achieved, to measure the load and the angle of rotation for the femoral head at this point. After measuring, the test was resumed.
Step 2: Until the failure of fixation, when the load was measured.
Descriptive analysis of the data observed (expressed as measures of central tendency and dispersion by fixation group) was presented in the form of tables to verify whether the existence of significant difference in maximum load between the groups.
The inferential analysis consisted of the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (non-parametric tests) to verify the existence of significant difference in the maximum load between the groups (Hollander & Wolfe, 1999; Dunn, 1964).
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 20.0, and a 5% significance level was adopted.
The biomechanical testing found different applied load measurements for the two groups.
Load values in newtons (N) for 5.0 mm of displacement
(2 parallel screws + Pauwels screw)
(2 parallel screws + Pauwels screw + medial plate)
Values for rotational deviation of the femoral head with 5.0 mm of displacement
(2 parallel screws + Pauwels screw)
(2 parallel screws + Pauwels screw + medial plate)
Rigidity values, in N/mm
(2 parallel screws + Pauwels screw)
(2 parallel screws + Pauwels screw + medial plate)
Maximum load, in Newtons (N)
(2 parallel screws + Pauwels screw)
(2 parallel screws + Pauwels screw + medial plate)
Descriptive analysis of maximum load (in newtons) by group
p value a
≠ significant b
G2 ≠ G1
Although the mean and standard deviation values are presented in Table 1, the median and interquartile range (Q1–Q3) are more suitable for expressing the maximum load of the groups because they are appropriate measures for data that do not have normal distribution (like the non-parametric tests and box plot), as shown in Fig. 9. A significant difference was found between the fixation groups for the maximum load using the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA (p = 0.003).
Combining a buttress plate in the medial region of the femur neck with cannulated screws improves the mechanical resistance of fixation in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. In mechanical tests replicating shear force (a component of the vector of body weight), we found that the assembly using two parallel cannulated screws at the bottom of the femoral neck and the Pauwels screw associated with a medial plate at the fracture apex did not fail in varus or shear, which are typical deviations in this fracture pattern. After an average maximum load of 1640 N, the mode of failure was observed, namely the opening of the upper part of the femoral neck; in the following step, continued deforming force led to subtrochanteric fracture in the peri-implant area in all 3 of 5 specimens.
Mir and Collinge hypothesized that the plate positioned on the medial vertex which characterizes Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures could act as a buttress, resisting shear forces and transforming them into compression forces (Mir & Collinge, 2015). These authors believe that this behavior would theoretically reduce the rate of complications related to the secondary deviations classically found in this fracture pattern. Ye et al. observed 89% consolidation using this assembly in treating 28 patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, with no cases of avascular necrosis, and two cases of consolidation with shortening of the femoral neck (Ye et al., 2017). Although they call attention to the short follow-up period (average of 13.6 months), the preliminary results were very favorable for using this arrangement in more unstable femoral neck fracture patterns in young adult patients.
The use of cannulated screws only (in the assembly tested in G1 of this experiment) appears to be insufficient for Pauwels type III fractures, although it has been demonstrated superior to other constructions which only use parallel screws on the femoral neck (Panteli et al., 2015; Shen et al., 2016; Gümüstas et al., 2014; Nowotarski et al., 2012; Noda et al., 2015). Luttrel et al. conducted a horizontal study with 247 orthopedists present at the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) and found that 28% of these professionals preferred to use an assembly with two cannulated screws parallel to the axis of the femoral neck and another screw outside this axis (the Pauwels screw) to treat Pauwels type III fractures (Luttrell et al., 2014). Fifty-eight per cent of these physicians based their decisions on the fact that this assembly is “more biomechanically stable”, 9.5% stated it presents “fewer complications”, and 8% stated this arrangement was “technically easier”. Only 48% of these surgeons agreed that this assembly is clearly supported by the literature (Luttrell et al., 2014). Indeed, even though this technique shows good results, few studies to date have corroborated the use of this assembly to treat Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in young adults (Gümüstas et al., 2014; Hoshino et al., 2016; Parker et al., 1991; Sirkin et al., 1999).
Some aspects must be analyzed for correct application of the surgical technique using the medial plate combined with cannulated screws. The first of these is the tendency for the femoral neck to rotate, which was observed after mechanical load was applied in step 1 of this experiment. We were unable to find an adequate explanation for this finding, although there was no failure in varus or shearing during step 2. The use of three screws parallel to the long axis of the femur neck instead of one horizontal screw (the Pauwels screw) may reduce this tendency since the presence of the medial plate increases compression force (converting the shear forces). The second is the presence of the medial plate very close to the articular capsule, or even within the capsule, as discussed by Mir and Collinge (Mir & Collinge, 2015). In the series by Ye et al., implant removal was not required in any patient for any reason, including implant proximity to the articular capsule (Ye et al., 2017). However, future studies will show if this concern is more theoretical or whether it deserves greater attention, and possibly may lead to adjustments to the surgical technique. The third is the potential risk of vascular damage to the femoral head, specifically the inferior retinacular artery, which was demonstrated to have a significant role in femoral head perfusion after femoral neck fractures (Lazaro et al., 2013). In a recent paper, Putnam et al. observed that the intraarticular course of the inferior retinacular artery lies within the Weitbrecht ligament between the femoral neck clock-face positions of 7:00 and 8:00, concluding that if the medial buttress plate is positioned at 6:00 along the femoral neck it will be anterior to the location of this artery and would not endanger the blood supply of the femoral head (Putnam et al., 2019).
This study has a number of limitations. First, the use of plastic bones, although this variable was controlled by the fact that the entire experiment was conducted using identical models from the same lot. Furthermore, a non-fracture control group was used to evaluate the mechanical resistance of the models and adjust the loads used in the experiment accordingly. Cristofolini et al. investigated the mechanical behavior of plastic models and found no significant differences in comparison with two groups of human femurs (fresh-frozen and freeze-dried/rehydrated) (Cristofolini et al., 1996). Finally, the use of plastic bone models presents an advantage over fresh or frozen human bones because the interfemoral variability of synthetic bones is 20 to 200 times less than in cadaverous specimens. This allows small differences to be characterized as significant, even with a small sample (Cristofolini et al., 1996). Secondly, was the lack of a comparative group using the sliding hip screw system (SHS), which is considered nowadays a more effective treatment for osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures in the young patient (Ma et al., 2018). Nowotarski et al. and Hoshino et al. showed in biomechanical and cohort studies, respectively, that the use of hip-screw systems results in fewer fixation failures in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures compared with constructions using only cannulated screws (Nowotarski et al., 2012; Hoshino et al., 2016). On the other hand, Gupta et al., in a clinical-radiological outcome study comparing cannulated screws with SHS in 85 young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, found no significant difference between these two implants (Gupta et al., 2016). In this study, our objective was to observe the mechanical behavior of two recent fixation options for this fracture which employ screws alone, considering that few articles in the literature support the use of these techniques or describe their surgical techniques in greater detail (Augat et al., 2019). Based on the results of our experiment, which demonstrated the mechanical superiority of the medial plate associated with cannulated screws, future investigations may extend beyond comparison of this arrangement with fixed-angle angle systems. Thirdly, not all of the vectors of force which affect the hip during physiological muscle contraction activities were simulated. In an electromyographic study, Giordano et al. demonstrated that the force exerted by the gluteus medius-tractus iliotibialis does an excellent job of reproducing what occurs in the hip during single-leg support (Giordano et al., 2006). Nevertheless, the majority of the tests evaluating the mechanical resistance of fixation at the proximal end of the femur reproduce only the axial load vector, which results from the action of the gluteus medius muscle and body weight (Zdero et al., 2010; Aminian et al., 2007; Walker et al., 2007). Finally, no washers were used in the study model, despite their important role in both distributing force as well as preventing penetration of the screw head into the lateral cortex of the femur (Bishop et al., 2014; Zlowodzki et al., 2015). However, because we used plastic models that reproduce the bone mineral density of a femur in a young adult, there is less risk of the complications described above, which are more commonly observed in patients with osteoporosis (Zlowodzki et al., 2005). Furthermore, no washers were used in any of the specimens in the current study, which provided a homogeneous assessment.
Biomechanical tests using synthetic bone models with a Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture demonstrated that fixation using two parallel inferior cannulated screws and a third more horizontal screw (the Pauwels screw) in combination with a medial side plate is superior to fixation using only the cannulated screws in the same arrangement. The mode of failure normally observed in this fracture pattern (varus and shear stress deviations) is not seen in the combined technique, probably because the medial plate converts shearing forces into compression forces, and particularly optimizes the function of the screws which are parallel to the axis of the femoral neck.
VG Protocol creation, manuscript creation, manuscript editing, data collection, and data analysis. RPP, DDA, ABA Protocol creation and data collection. MG, WB, AF, NPA, Manuscript editing and critical review. HAK, Senior author, manuscript editing, and critical review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Aminian A, Gao F, Fedoriw WW, Zhang LQ, Kalainov DM, Merk BR (2007) Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma 21:544–548View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asnis SE (1985) The guided screw system in intracapsular fractures of the hip. Contemp Orthop 10:33–42Google Scholar
- Augat P, Bliven E, Hackl S (2019) Biomechanics of femoral neck fractures and implications for fixation. J Orthop Trauma 33:S27–S32View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basso T, Klaksvik J, Syversen U, Foss OA (2012) Biomechanical femoral neck fracture experiments – a narrative review. Injury 43:1633–1639View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bishop JA, Behn AW, Castillo TN (2014) The biomechanical significance of washer use with screw fixation. J Orthop Trauma 28:114–117View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Toni A (1996) Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomech 29:525–535View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Damany DS, Parker MJ, Chojnowski A (2005) Complications after intracapsular hip fractures in young adults. A meta-analysis of 18 published studies involving 564 fractures. Injury 36:131–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunn OJ (1964) Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241–252View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Estrada LS, Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Alonso JE (2002) Fixation failure in femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 399:110–118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Filipov O (2011) Biplane double-supported screw fixation (F technique): a method of screw fixation at osteoporotic fractures of the femoral neck. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 21:539–543View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Giordano V, Luz EM, Lima-Filho JCC, Serafim MAM, Amaral NP, Scappini W Jr (2006) Estudo eletromiográfico das forças atuantes no quadril em apoio monopodal: uma nova visão sobre o modelo de Koch. Rev Bras Ortop 41:278–282Google Scholar
- Giordano V, Paes RP, Alves DD, Amaral AB, Belangero WD, Giordano M, Freitas A, Koch HA (2018) Stability of L-shaped and inverted triangle fixation assemblies in treating Pauwels type II femoral neck fracture: a comparative mechanical study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28:1359–1367View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gümüstas SA, Tosun HB, Air I, Orak MM, Onay T, Okçu G (2014) Influence of number and orientation of screws on stability in the internal fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 48:673–678View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gupta M, Arya RK, Kumar S, Jain VK, Sinha S, Naik AK (2016) Comparative study of multiple cancellous screws versus sliding hip screws in femoral neck fractures of young adults. Chin J Traumatol 19(4):209–212View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gurusamy K, Parker MJ, Rowlands TK (2005) The complications of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip. The effect of screw positioning and angulation on fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:632–634View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1999) Nonparametric statistical methods, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York 787pGoogle Scholar
- Hoshino CM, Christian MW, O’Toole RV, Manson TT (2016) Fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults: fixed-angle devices or Pauwels screws? Injury 47:1676–1684View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lazaro LE, Sculco PK, Pardee NC, Klinger CE, Dyke JP, Helfet DL et al (2013) Assessment of femoral head and head-neck junction perfusion following surgical hip dislocation using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e1821–e1828PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luttrell K, Beltran M, Collinge CA (2014) Preoperative decision making in the treatment of high-angle “vertical” femoral neck fractures in young adult patients. An expert opinion survey of the Orthopaedic trauma Association’s (OTA) membership. J Orthop Trauma 28:e221–e225View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma JX, Kuang MJ, Xing F, Zhao YL, Chen HT, Zhang LK, Fan ZR, Han C, Ma XL (2018) Sliding hip screw versus cannulated cancellous screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults: a systematic review. Int J Surg 52:89–97View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mir H, Collinge C (2015) Application of a medial buttress plate may prevent many treatment failures seen after fixation of vertical femoral neck fractures in young adults. Med Hypoth 84:429–433View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noda M, Saegusa Y, Takahashi M, Tezuka D, Adachi K, Nao K (2015) Biomechanical study using the finite element method of internal fixation in Pauwels type III vertical femoral neck fractures. Arch Trauma Res 4:e23167View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nowotarski PJ, Ervin B, Weatherby B, Pettit J, Goulet R, Norris B (2012) Biomechanical analysis of a novel femoral neck locking plate for treatment of vertical shear Pauwel’s type C femoral neck fractures. Injury 43:802–806View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Panteli M, Rodham P, Giannoudis PV (2015) Biomechanical rationale for implant choices in femoral neck fracture fixation in the non-elderly. Injury 46:445–452View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parker MJ, Porter KM, Eastwood DM, Schembi Wismayer M, Bernard AA (1991) Intracapsular fractures of the neck of the femur: parallel or cross garden screws? J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:826–827View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Putnam SM, Collinge CA, Gardner MJ, Ricci WM, McAndrew CM (2019) Vascular anatomy of the medial femoral neck and implications for surface plate fixation. J Orthop Trauma 33:111–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shen M, Wang C, Chen H, Rui YF, Zhao S (2016) An update on the Pauwels classification. J Orthop Surg Res 11:161View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sirkin M, Grossman MG, Renard RL, Sabatino CT, Doumas C, Reilly MC, et al (1999) A biomechanical analysis of fixation constructs in high angle femoral neck fractures. Paper presented at the Orthopaedic trauma association annual meeting. Abstract 29Google Scholar
- Walker E, Mukherjee DP, Ogden AL, Sadasivan KK, Albright JA (2007) A biomechanical study of simulated femoral neck fracture fixation by cannulated screws: effects of placement angle and number of screws. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 36:680–684Google Scholar
- Yang JJ, Lin LC, Chao KH, Chuang SY, Wu CC, Yeh TT, Lian YT (2013) Risk factors for nonunion in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with three cannulated screws placed in either a triangle or an inverted triangle configuration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:61–69View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ye Y, Chen K, Tian K, Li W, Mauffrey C, Hak DJ (2017) Medial buttress plate augmentation of cannulated screw fixation in vertically unstable femoral neck fractures: surgical technique and preliminary results. Injury 48:2189–2193View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zdero R, Keast-Butler O, Schemitsch EH (2010) A biomechanical comparison of two triple-screw methods for femoral neck fracture fixation in a synthetic bone model. J Trauma 69:1537–1544View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zlowodzki M, Weening B, Petrisor B, Bhandari M (2005) The value of washers in cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures. J Trauma 59:969–975View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zlowodzki M, Wijdicks CA, Armitage BM, Cole PA (2015) The value of washers in internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with cancellous screws: a biomechanical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma 29(2):e69–e72View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar