Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Download PDF

A lower starting point for the medial cut increases the posterior slope in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a cadaveric study

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics volume 9, Article number: 124 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects on the posterior tibial slope of different distances from the joint line to start the osteotomy and of varying the placement of the opening wedge in high tibial osteotomy.

Starting the osteotomy more distally and an incorrect location for the tibial opening wedge were hypothesized to increase the posterior tibial slope.

Methods

A cadaveric study was conducted using 12 knees divided into two groups based on the distance from the joint line to the start of the osteotomy: 3 and 4 cm. The preintervention posterior tibial slope was measured radiologically. Once the osteotomy was performed, the medial cortex of the tibia was divided into anteromedial, medial, and posteromedial thirds. A 10° opening wedge was sequentially placed in each third, and the effect on the posterior tibial slope was evaluated radiographically.

Results: Significant changes were observed only in the 3-cm group (p = 0.02) when the wedge was placed in the anteromedial zone. In contrast, in the 4-cm group, significant differences were observed when the opening wedge was placed at both the medial (p = 0.04) and anteromedial (p = 0.012) zones.

Conclusion

Correct control of the posterior tibial slope can be achieved by avoiding a low point when beginning the osteotomy and placing the opening wedge in the posteromedial third of the tibia when performing an opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Level of evidence

Controlled laboratory study.

Background

Proximal high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is the most widely accepted treatment for physically active patients with initial stages of medial femorotibial compartment degeneration and varus alignment of the limb [1]. Due to its particular advantages, opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) has become more widely used in recent years than lateral closing-wedge osteotomies. Among these advantages, the lack of a need to perform an osteotomy of the fibular head with the subsequent risk of neurovascular injury [2] and less surgical exposure without muscle detachment have been cited [3]. In addition, the effect of OWHTO on the tibial metaphysis comparatively facilitates the performance of future knee arthroplasty [4].

However, OWHTO is not without potential disadvantages, including an increase in the posterior tibial slope (PTS) and a decrease in the patellar height (PH) [5].

Recently, the effects of the PTS on the biomechanics and stability of the knee [6, 7] have been described, as well as the tension exerted on both native and reconstructed cruciate ligaments [8,9,10]. Clinical and biomechanical studies have reported that the tension on the native or reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) increases significantly after minimal changes in the PTS of only 2°, increasing the risk of failure [11, 12]. It is believed that the triangular cross-section of the tibia at this level as well as the way the osteotomy gap is produced highly influence the increase in the PTS [13, 14]. However, the inclination of the osteotomy plane has not been investigated.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect on the PTS of modifying the distance from the joint line where the osteotomy begins in the medial cortex of the tibia and of varying the placement of the opening wedge from posterior to anterior.

An increase in the PTS was hypothesized to be observed both when distalizing the point where the osteotomy begins and when anteriorizing the tibial opening wedge.

Materials and methods

For this analysis, 12 cadaveric human knees were used, stored at a temperature of − 18 °C, and thawed at room temperature for 24 to 36 hours prior to the procedure, during which they were wrapped in gauze moistened with saline solution. Each knee included the distal two-thirds of the femur and the proximal two-thirds of the tibia and fibula. The knees were macroscopically evaluated and showed no signs of having undergone surgery. In addition, prior to use, the absence of local radiographical bone lesions or any significant bone malformation that might affect the anatomy was confirmed.

The knees were randomly divided into two groups based on the distance from the start of the osteotomy to the joint line: 3 and 4 cm (cm). All surgical procedures were performed by the same team of two senior orthopaedic surgeons.

The study was approved by the clinical research ethics committee of our institution (protocol number PR260/21-CSA PR22/2021).

Radiographic technique

Prior to performing the osteotomy, the radiographic procedure was standardized to achieve greater reproducibility of the technique and to ensure that no magnification errors would influence the measurements [15]. Initially, each knee was placed extended in the anteroposterior (AP) plane, and the image was focused on the centre of the tibial shaft. One-third of the fibular head was covered by the lateral tibial plateau to ensure a correct AP view. This AP view was used to measure the width (mediolateral) of the tibial epiphysis by creating a parallel line that passed 5 mm distal to the joint space. In addition, the mediolateral size of the tibia was measured 3 and 4 cm from the joint line using a line parallel to that described above.

Subsequently, a strict lateral knee X-ray, where both femoral condyle contours perfectly overlapped, was performed at 30° of flexion. This projection was used to measure the PTS.

Radiological PTS evaluation

The medial and lateral tibial plateaus were initially identified to establish the PTS. The mean between the inclinations of both plateaus was used as previously published [16]. In measuring both tibial plateaus, the existence of osteophytes was excluded. In the same lateral view of the knee, the longitudinal component of the PTS was established by following the proximal anatomical axis of the tibia. For this analysis, two points were identified at 5 and 15 cm distal to the joint line. The midpoint of these levels, namely, the distance between the anterior and posterior cortex of the tibia, was identified. These midpoints were connected with a line that determined the longitudinal axis mentioned above and are shown in Fig. 1 [17, 18]. The same protocol was used for the radiographic technique and measurement of the PTS after osteotomy.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Tibial slope measurement on lateral radiographs. The tibial proximal anatomic axis (TPAA) is drawn connecting the midpoints between the anterior and posterior tibial cortex at five and 15 cm distances to the joint line. A reference line is drawn perpendicular to this at the level of the tibiofemoral joint. The mean between the inclinations of both plateaus is also shown. The angle of this line to the reference line is defined as the posterior tibial slope (PTS)

Full size image

All radiographic measurements were performed by two orthopaedic surgeons using the picture archiving and communications system (PACS) (Centricity Enterprise Web V3.0; GE Healthcare).

Osteotomy technique

A 6- to 8-cm longitudinal skin incision was made in the anteromedial and proximal area of the leg midway between the anterior tuberosity and the posteromedial edge of the tibia. After dissecting the subcutaneous tissue, the tendons of the pes anserinus were incised longitudinally in a single plane at the level of the anterior margin of the medial collateral ligament. Both structures were carefully retracted posteriorly with the help of a Hohman retractor. The patellar tendon was identified and protected with a retractor. After the metaphyseal-diaphyseal transition zone of the tibia was identified, according to the randomization group (namely, 3 or 4 cm) (Fig. 2), a 2.4-mm Kirschner wire was introduced under fluoroscopic control (C-ARM Fluoroscopy 4400, FM Control, Alava, Spain) in the medial cortex aiming posterolaterally towards the proximal end of the fibular head. The tip of the wire was located 1.5 cm distal to the joint space and 1 cm medial to the lateral cortex. Following wire insertion, the osteotomy was performed, and special attention was paid to maintaining perpendicularity with respect to the sagittal long axis of the bone. Initially, the procedure was started with a saw and continued with a calibrated osteotome, with particular focus on completion of the osteotomy in the posterolateral region of the tibia and preserving one cm of bone in the lateral tibial cortex, which acts as a hinge [14, 19]. Subsequently, a lamina spreader was used to verify a sufficient opening to progressively place a 10° opening wedge (Newclip Technics, Haute-Goulaine, France).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Medial starting point. Anteromedial view of the right knee. (a) Kirschner wire located at the level of the joint line and measurement of the site where the osteotomy will begin. JL, joint line. (b) The methodology is graphed according the sites where the osteotomy will begin according to randomization. PT, patellar tendon (c) Two 2.4-mm wires are introduced at 3 and 4 cm, which will serve as a guide for performing the osteotomy for the 3 and 4 cm groups, respectively. A wide dissection of skin and subcutaneous tissue is performed to facilitate understanding of the image. TT, tibial tuberosity

Full size image

After the anteromedial, medial and posteromedial (AM, M and PM, respectively) thirds of the medial cortex of the tibia were identified, the same 10° opening wedge was placed in each third (Fig. 3), and radiographic projections were taken as explained previously (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Anteromedial view of the right knee, 4 cm case. The placement of the opening wedge in the M third of the tibia generates a parallel gap (a). In contrast, when the wedge is located in the PM third of the tibia, the result is an asymmetric gap. The extent to which the medial collateral ligament (MCL) may hinder the posterior placement of the opening wedge is also shown (b). PT, patellar tendon; AM, anteromedial; M, medial; PM, posteromedial

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Radiographic control in a left knee, 3 cm case. Anteroposterior view (a) and lateral knee projection (b) with an opening wedge in the PM third location. AM, anteromedial; M, medial; PM, posteromedial

Full size image

Internal fixation was not performed with plates since the objective of the study was to evaluate the possible variations in the tibial slope and not the stability provided by an implant.

Statistical analysis

A descriptive analysis of the study variables was performed. Radiographic parameters were measured twice by two independent orthopaedic surgeons at 6-week intervals. The inter- and intrarater reliability for the radiographic measurements was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The ICC values were interpreted as follows: ICC < 0.40, poor agreement; 0.4 > ICC < 0.75, fair to good agreement; and ICC > 0.75, excellent agreement [20, 21].

The chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables, and the t test was used for continuous variables. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to compare the PTS measurements at the different sites where the opening was performed and the starting point of the osteotomy.

The sample size was calculated a priori. With six subjects per group (n = 12), a statistical power of 80% was obtained to detect a difference ≥ 2° between the different tests [22], accepting an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2 in a bilateral comparison.

Because this is a cadaveric study, a loss to follow-up rate of 0% was estimated. All data were analysed with SPSS Statistics (v 21; IBM), with statistical significance was established for p < 0.05.

Results

Eight of the knees were obtained from women and four from men. Six were right knees, and six were left knees. The mean age was 65.3 ± 13.3 years. The overall descriptive analysis is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Descriptive statistics
Full size table

Global measurement of the PTS (n = 12)

The mean preoperative PTS was not significantly different from the postoperative value when placing the opening wedge at the PM level (preoperative 7.0 ± 2.3° and postoperative 7.2 ± 2.5°, p = n.s.). On the other hand, placement of the opening wedge at any other site resulted in significant changes at both the M and AM levels (postoperative M 8.7 ± 2.8°, p = 0.02 and postoperative AM 11.2 ± 3.3°, p < 0.0001). The remaining results from the global analysis and the relative differences are presented in Table 2 and Fig. 5.

Table 2 Comparison of preoperative and global (3 & 4 cm, n = 12) postoperative PTS
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Preoperative vs postoperative PTS (global 3 & 4 cm, n = 12). The red text indicates significant changes. R. D, relative difference; AM, anteromedial; M, medial; PM, posteromedial

Full size image

PTS in the 3 cm group

Based on the analysis of the 3 cm group, placing the opening wedge in the PM (p = n.s.) or M (p = n.s.) zone did not significantly alter the resulting PTS, and a relative difference from the preoperative values of 3% and 17%, respectively, was observed (Table 3 and Fig. 6).

Table 3 Independent comparisons of preoperative and postoperative PTS in the 3 and 4 cm groups
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

Comparisons of preoperative and postoperative PTS, in the 3 and 4 cm groups. The red text indicates significant changes. R. D, relative difference; AM, anteromedial; M, medial; PM, posteromedial

Full size image

PTS in the 4 cm group

The preoperative PTS was only maintained when placing the opening wedge at the PM level (p = n.s.). Placement at the M (p = 0.04) and AM (p = 0.012) levels generated significant changes in the postoperative PTS. The relative differences from the preoperative value were 31 and 63%, respectively, as shown in Table 3 and Fig. 6.

Mediolateral measurement

The measured mediolateral size of the tibial epiphysis was not correlated with the magnitude of the postoperative modifications of the PTS.

Measurement reliability

The interrater reliability of the pre- and postosteotomy PTS measurements was “excellent” and is shown in Table 4. The intrarater reliability was also considered “excellent”, with ICC values ≥0.91 for all measurements performed by both evaluators.

Table 4 Interrater reliability
Full size table

Discussion

The most relevant findings of this study reflect the impact on the PTS of distalizing the point where the osteotomy begins, since a greater distance between the beginning of the osteotomy and the joint line results in a greater risk of causing changes in the PTS. Another finding in this study is the importance of placing the opening wedge in the PM third of the tibia when performing an HTO, since significant changes in PTS were not detected in either group (3 or 4 cm) after the procedure. The results of the present study confirm the initial hypothesis.

As previously reported, the PTS tends to increase when performing OWHTO [5]. This increase in the inclination in the sagittal plane is transformed into a greater force of tibial displacement towards the anterior direction, increasing the demand on the native ACL [23]. Likewise, evidence also supports the impact of the PTS on the ACL postreconstruction [24, 25].

A greater lateral PTS in patients who suffered early failure after ACL reconstruction versus those who had satisfactory results after the same reconstruction was shown by Christensen et al. [26, 27].

The role of the medial PTS as a predictive factor for ACL reconstruction failure is more controversial [28, 29]. However, different studies [30,31,32] are consistent with those published by Webb et al. [10]; in their study, a medial PTS > 12° was stated to increase the risk of failure after ACL reconstruction.

Furthermore, an iatrogenic increase in the PTS not only affects the native or reconstructed ACL but also, as Rodner et al. have shown, generates greater pressure in the posteromedial compartment [33].

According to the findings from the present study, the undesired effects on the ACL and the increased pressure on the posteromedial compartment observed after the increase in the PTS might be avoided by considering certain technical aspects during the performance of an OWHTO, such as the distance from the joint space where the osteotomy begins and the placement of the opening wedge in the PM third of the tibia.

Consistent with the data published by Rubino et al., performing the opening in the PM third of the tibia successfully avoids modifications in the PTS. The findings of our study show that as the opening wedge is moved to the M and AM thirds, the increases in the PTS are progressive (Table 3), similar to the study by Rubino et al. In their study, the placement of the wedge at the level of the M third also showed significant changes in the TS, although the authors did not specify the distance from the joint line where the osteotomy began [34]. According to the results obtained in our study, the height where the osteotomy begins plays a relevant role in the resulting PTS, since no significant differences in the PTS were observed when the opening was created in the medial third in the 3 cm group (preoperative PTS of 6.5 ± 1.9° vs. postoperative PTS of 7.6 ± 2.5°, relative difference 17%, p = n.s.). However, a significant increase in the PTS was observed when the osteotomy began 4 cm from the joint space and the opening was established at the level of the M third (preoperative PTS of 7.5 ± 2.8° vs. postoperative PTS of 9.8 ± 2.9°, relative difference 31%, p = 0.04).

The findings presented in our study may be related to the three-triangle method published by Noyes et al. in 2005 [35]. In that study, the medial cortical tibia was established to have an angulation of 45° in the axial plane, and when creating the opening, the anterior gap was suggested to be half of the posterior gap. According to their published data, assuming a medial cortex of the tibia measuring 40 mm, a 10° increase in the PTS would be generated by an error of 5 mm in the size of the anterior gap. It was concluded by the authors that as a general rule, for a 40-mm medial cortex, each millimetre alteration in the opening gap results in a 2° increase in the PTS. It was also established that if the size of the medial cortex decreases to 20 mm, then each millimetre of error in the anterior opening gap generates a 4° increase in the PTS. According to the data from this study and the existing differences in the mediolateral distance at 3 and 4 cm in our series (Table 1), when selecting a distal site to begin the osteotomy, a smaller medial cortical bone is assumed, which is associated with a greater risk of producing increases in the PTS after minimal changes in the placement of the opening wedge [36].

Different authors mention the site they chose to begin the osteotomy, but to our knowledge, these different levels have not been compared with each other to date. Matar et al. preferred the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction area, distal to the capsular insertion and 3 cm from the joint space, considering this site as the safest since they managed to place a retractor and protect the posterior neurovascular structures [37]. In contrast, Noyes FR et al. prefer starting at 3.5 cm [38], and other authors have started at 4 cm from the joint space [39].

The findings from the present study have an even more relevant implication for those cases where simultaneous ACL reconstruction associated with OWHTO is proposed. In these cases, it was suggested by Cantivalli et al. that OWHTO should begin 4 cm from the joint space to create a tibial tunnel of sufficient length and prevent it from starting within the osteotomy gap [39]. The lower starting point suggested by these authors could generate a clear undesired effect on the PTS if the surgeon does not maintain strict placement of the opening wedge at the PM level. In this context, the opening at the level of the M third would generate an increase in the PTS > 2°, with all the consequences that this change would impose on the recent reconstruction of the ACL [10, 11].

Recently, in another cadaveric study [19], the effect on the PTS of an OWHTO in which the lateral hinge was located 1 cm distal to the standard position was analysed [1, 33, 40]. The authors of this study concluded that the distalization of the lateral hinge generated an increase in the PTS compared to the site defined as a standard to locate it. This distalization of the hinge not only affected the PTS but also generated a greater number of fractures in the lateral cortex of the tibia. These aforementioned changes were attributed by the authors to the decrease in the axial size of the tibia at that level. In our study, cases of fracture were not observed when the standard height of the lateral hinge was chosen. However, when the osteotomy was started 4 cm from the joint space, which represents a smaller ML distance, changes in the PTS occurred more easily, similar to the results published by Jo HS et al. [19].

This study is not without limitations. Because it was a cadaveric study, the number of subjects was limited. However, the number of specimens used is consistent with other cadaver studies focused on the analysis of the tibial slope, whose range is 8–16 knees [1, 13, 19]. Due to the characteristic bone quality of this sample, we did not propose the creation of openings of different amplitudes. These limitations were minimized by selecting the degree of opening based on the protocols used in other studies that analyse the PTS when performing an OWHTO [13]. In addition, because the specimens did not include the ankle joint, the PTS was measured on a lateral radiograph of the knee according to the proximal anatomic axis of the tibia [41]. However, with this methodology, no significant differences in the PTS should be observed if it is measured according to the complete anatomical axis of the tibia on full-length lateral radiographs [42]. Similarly, varus/valgus alignment could not be evaluated due to the lack of a complete limb and the impossibility of performing radiographs in the standing position [43].

Finally, and when also presenting the amputation in the proximal third of the femur, the possible relationship between the different changes produced in the PTS and the patellar height could not be studied due to the interruption of the extensor apparatus.

In terms of the clinical relevance of this work, both the site where the opening is performed and the corresponding wedge is placed and the distance from the joint line where the osteotomy will begin must be considered by the orthopaedic surgeon prior to surgery. In cases requiring an OWHTO associated with ACL reconstruction, the distalization of the site where the osteotomy begins potentially exerts a relevant effect on the PTS.

Conclusion

Correct control of the posterior tibial slope can be achieved by avoiding a low point when beginning the osteotomy and placing the opening wedge in the posteromedial third of the tibia when performing an opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HTO:

high tibial osteotomy

OWHTO:

opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy

PTS:

posterior tibial slope

PH:

patellar height

ACL:

anterior cruciate ligament

cm:

centimetres

AP:

anteroposterior

AM:

anteromedial

M:

medial

PM:

posteromedial

ICC:

intraclass correlation coefficient

MRI:

magnetic resonance imaging.

References

  1. Wang JH, Bae JH, Lim HC, Shon WY, Kim CW, Cho JW (2009) Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy: the effect of the cortical hinge on posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 37:2441–2418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duivenvoorden T, van Diggele P, Reijman M, Bos PK, van Egmond J, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA et al (2017) Adverse events and survival after closing- and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a comparative study of 412 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(3):895–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hankemeier S, Mommsen P, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M, Brand J, Meyer C et al (2010) Accuracy of high tibial osteotomy: comparison between open- and closed- wedge technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1328–1333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Han JH, Yang JH, Bhandare NN, Suh DW, Lee JS, Chang YS et al (2016) Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review of open versus closed wedge osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(8):2567–2577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keliang W, Zeng J, Han L, Feng W, Lin X, Zeng Y (2021) Effect of the amount of correction on posterior tibial slope and patellar height in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 29(3):9–12

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dai Y, Cross MB, Angibaud LD, Hamad C, Jung A, Jenny J-Y (2018) Posterior tibial slope impacts intraoperatively measured mid-flexion anteroposterior kinematics during cruciate- retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26(11):3325–3332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang K-T, Kwon SK, Son J, Kwon O-R, Lee J-S, Koh Y-G (2018) The increase in posterior tibial slope provides a positive biomechanical effect in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26(10):3188–3195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernhardson AS, DePhillipo NN, Aman ZS, Kennedy MI, Dornan GJ, LaPrade RF (2019) Decreased posterior tibial slope does not affect postoperative posterior knee laxity after double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 47(2):318–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernhardson AS, DePhillipo NN, Daney BT, Kennedy MI, Aman ZS, LaPrade RF (2019) Posterior tibial slope and risk of posterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 47(2):312–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Webb JM, Salmon LJ, Leclerc E, Pinczewski LA, Roe JP (2013) Posterior tibial slope and further anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament– reconstructed patient. Am J Sports Med 41(12):2800–2804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernhardson AS, Aman ZS, DePhillipo NN, Dornan GJ, Storaci HW, Brady AW et al (2019) Tibial slope and its effect on graft force in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 47(5):1168–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gwinner C, Weiler A, Roider M, Schaefer FM, Jung TM (2017) Tibial slope strongly influences knee stability after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 45(2):355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruzbarsky JJ, Arner JW, Dornan GJ, Provencher MT, Vidal AF (2021) Tibial slope can be maintained during medial opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy with sagittally oriented hinge, posterior plate position and knee hyperextension: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 27(7):2181–2188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Teng Y, Mizu-Uchi H, Xia Y, Akasaki Y, Akiyama T, Kawahara S et al (2021) Axial but not sagittal hinge axis affects posterior tibial slope in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a three-dimensional surgical simulation study. Arthroscopy 2:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Franken M, Grimm B, Heyligers I (2010) A comparison of four systems for calibration when templating for total hip replacement with digital radiography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):136–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Utzschneider S, Goettinger M, Weber P, Horng A, Glaser C, Jansson V et al (2011) Development and validation of a new method for the radiologic measurement of the tibial slope. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 19(10):1643–1648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brazier J, Migaud H, Gougeon F, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Duquennoy A (1996) Evaluation of methods for radiographic measurement of the tibial slope. A study of 83 healthy knees. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 82(3):195–200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dejour H, Bonnin M (1994) Tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Two radiological tests compared. J Bone Spont Surg Br 76:745–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jo HS, Park JS, Byun JH, Lee YB, Choi YL, Cho SH et al (2018) The effects of different hinge positions on posterior tibial slope in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1851–1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cicchetti DV (1993) Guidelines , criteria , and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleiss JL, Chilton NW, Park MH (1980) Inter- and intra-examiner variability in scoring supragingival plaque: II. Stat An Pharmacol Ther Dent 5(1–2):5–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoo JH, Chang CB, Shin KS, Seong SC, Kim TK (2008) Anatomical references to assess the posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 5 anatomical axes. J Arthroplast 23(4):586–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Imhoff FB, Comer B, Obopilwe E, Beitzel K, Arciero RA, Mehl JT (2021) Effect of slope and varus correction high tibial osteotomy in the ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knee on kinematics and ACL graft force: a biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 49(2):410–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim JE, Won S, Jaffar MSA, Lee JI, Kim TW, Lee YS (2020) How does geometric change after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy affect anterior cruciate ligament status? Knee 27(3):940–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin LJ, Akpinar B, Meislin RJ (2020) Tibial slope and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes. J Bone Join Surg Rev 8(4):e0184. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Christensen JJ, Krych AJ, Engasser WM, Vanhees MK, Collins MS, Dahm DL (2015) Lateral tibial posterior slope is increased in patients with early graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43(10):2510–2514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitchell JJ, Cinque ME, Dornan GJ, Matheny LM, Dean CS et al (2018) Primary versus revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patient demographics, radiographic findings, and associated lesions. Arthroscopy 34(3):695–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li Y, Hong L, Feng H, Wang Q, Zhang H, Song G (2014) Are failures of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction associated with steep posterior tibial slopes? A case control study. Chin Med J 127(14):2649–2653

    Google Scholar 

  29. Su AW, Bogunovic L, Smith MV, Gortz S, Brophy RH, Wright RW et al (2020) Medial tibial slope determined by plain radiography is not assocaited with primary or recurrent anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Knee Surg 33(1):22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee CC, Youm YS, Cho SD, Jung SH, Bae MH, Park SJ et al (2018) Does posterior tibial slope affect graft rupture following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Arthoscopy 34(7):2152–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Salmon LJ, Heath E, Akrawi H, Roe JP, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA (2018) 20-year outcomes of anterior crucaite ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: the catastrophic effect of age and posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 46(3):531–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stijak L, Herzog RF, Schai P (2008) Is there an influence of the tibial slope of the lateral condyle on the ACL lesion? A case-control study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthosc 16(2):112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodner CM, Adams DJ, Diaz-Doran V, Tate JP, Santangelo SA, Mazzocca AD et al (2006) Medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy and the saggital plane: the effect of increasing tibial slope on tibiofemroal contact pressure. Am J Sports Med 34(9):1431–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubino JL, Schoderbek RJ, Raymond Golish S, Miller MD, Baumfeld J (2008) The effect of plate position and size on tibial slope in high tibial osteotomy. J Knee Surg 21:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Noyes FR, Goebel SX, West J (2005) Opening wedge tibial osteotomy: the 3-triangle method to correct axial alignment and tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 33:378–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weißenberger M, Wagenbrenner M, Schote F, Horas K, Schäfer T, Rudert M et al (2022) The 3-triangle method preserves the posterior tibial slope during high tibial valgus osteotomy: first preliminary data using a mathematical model. J Exp Orthop 9(1):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Matar WY, Boscariol R, Dervin GF (2009) Open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a roentgenographic comparison of a horizontal and an oblique osteotomy on patellar height and sagittal tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 37:735–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Noyes FR, Mayfield W, Barber-Westin SD, Albright JC, Heck-mann TP (2006) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: an opera- tive technique and rehabilitation program to decrease complica- tions and promote early union and function. Am J Sports Med 34(8):1262–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cantivalli A, Rosso F, Bonasia D, Rossi R (2019) High tibial osteotomy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction/revision. Clin Sports Med 38(3):417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Moon SW, Park SH, Lee BH, Oh M, Chang M, Ahn JH et al (2015) The effect of hinge position on posterior tibial slope in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 31(6):1128–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Konrads C, Ahrend MD, Beyer MR, Stöckle U, Ahmad SS (2021) Supracondylar rotation osteotomy of the femur influences the coronal alignment of the ankle. J Exp Orthop 8(1):32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dean RS, DePhillipo N, Chahla J, Larson CM, Laprade RF (2021) Posterior tibial slope measurements using the anatomic axis are significantly increased compared with those that use the mechanical axis. Arthroscopy 37(1):243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ahmad SS, Kerber V, Konrads C, Ateschrang A, Hirschmann MT, Stöckle U et al (2021) The ischiofemoral space of the hip is influenced by the frontal knee alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(8):2446–2452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang Z, Zeng Y, She W, Luo X, Cai L (2018) Is opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy superior to closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy in treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 12(60):153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank to the Experimental Surgery Center and Radiology Department from Hospital Parc Tauli, Sabadell, for their special contribution in this paper. They also want to thank María Angela Zumel, Ph. D, Marta Banque, Ph. D, and Gaston Rodriguez Granillo, M. D, Ph.D, for assisting in the statistical analysis. Finally, they thank the institutional support from Newclip Technics (Haute-Goulaine, France), who provided the instrumentation required for completion of this study.

Funding

No funding of whatever form was provided for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Carrer Dr. Joan Soler, 1-3, 08243, Manresa, Spain

    Juan Ignacio Erquicia & Joan Leal-Blanquet

  2. IMOVE, Mi Tres Torres, Av. Via Augusta, 281, 08017, Barcelona, Spain

    Juan Ignacio Erquicia & Joan Leal-Blanquet

  3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Consorci Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Parc del Taulí, 1, 08208, Sabadell, Spain

    Sergi Gil-Gonzalez & Xavier Pelfort

  4. ICATME. Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Carrer de Sabino Arana 5, 08028, Barcelona, Spain

    Maximiliano Ibañez & Juan Carlos Monllau

  5. Departament de Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Carrer Casanova 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain

    Andrés Combalia

  6. Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Carrer Casanova 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain

    Andrés Combalia

  7. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology. Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Passeig Marítim, 25, 08003, Barcelona, Spain

    Juan Carlos Monllau

Authors
  1. Juan Ignacio Erquicia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sergi Gil-Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maximiliano Ibañez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joan Leal-Blanquet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrés Combalia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Juan Carlos Monllau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xavier Pelfort
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JIE designed the study and draft the manuscript. SG and JIE carried out the osteotomies. SG and MI performed the radiographic measurements. JCM and JLB co-analyzed the data and were major contributors in writing the manuscript. AC and XP co-designed the study and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Ignacio Erquicia.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the corresponding clinical research ethics committee (protocol number PR260/21-CSA PR22/2021). For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erquicia, J.I., Gil-Gonzalez, S., Ibañez, M. et al. A lower starting point for the medial cut increases the posterior slope in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a cadaveric study. J EXP ORTOP 9, 124 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00562-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00562-z

Keywords