Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Download PDF
  • Original Paper
  • Open access
  • Published:

Steeper lateral posterior tibial slope and greater lateral-medial slope asymmetry correlate with greater preoperative pivot-shift in anterior cruciate ligament injury

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics volume 9, Article number: 117 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the association between posterior tibial slope (PTS) and preoperative pivot-shift phenomenon in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knees.

Methods

Fifty unilateral ACL-injured patients (mean age: 28.0 ± 11.4 years, 29 males) who underwent ACL reconstruction were retrospectively included. Patients with a history of injury to the ipsilateral knee joint, concomitant ligament injuries with ACL injury, and/or more than one year from injury to surgery, were excluded. Pivot-shift tests were performed preoperatively under general anaesthesia using an electromagnetic measurement system, and tibial acceleration (m/s2) during the posterior reduction of the tibia was measured. Medial and lateral PTS (°) were measured respectively using high-resolution CT images taken two weeks after surgery. Lateral-medial slope asymmetry was calculated by subtracting medial PTS from lateral PTS (lateral-medial PTS) and we evaluated the correlation between each PTS parameter (medial PTS, lateral PTS, and lateral-medial slope asymmetry) and tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Medial PTS was 4.9 ± 2.0°, and lateral PTS was 5.2 ± 1.9°. The lateral-medial slope asymmetry was 0.3 ± 1.6° (range: -2.9 to 3.8). Tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test in the ACL-injured knee was 1.6 ± 0.1 m/s2. Preoperative tibial acceleration was positively correlated with lateral PTS (r = 0.436, p < 0.01), and lateral-medial slope asymmetry (r = 0.443, p < 0.01), while no significant correlation was found between preoperative tibial acceleration and medial PTS (r = 0.06, p = 0.70).

Conclusion

Preoperative greater tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test was associated with steeper lateral PTS and greater lateral-medial slope asymmetry in ACL-injured knees. These findings improve our understanding of anterolateral rotatory knee laxity by linking tibial bony morphology to quantitative measurement of pivot-shift phenomenon. Surgeons should be aware that not only lateral PTS but also lateral-medial slope asymmetry are the factors associated with preoperative pivot-shift.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Introduction

In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knees, the cause of the spectrum of anterolateral rotatory knee laxity is multifactorial: the degree or chronicity of the injury to the ACL; injury to secondary knee stabilisers (i.e. lateral meniscus and anterolateral complex); bony morphology (i.e. intercondylar notch width and the shape of the tibial eminence) as well as patient characteristics (i.e. sex and generalised joint laxity) [4, 5, 13, 25]. The pivot-shift test is the most commonly used clinical examination to evaluate anterolateral rotatory knee laxity [22]. The preoperative pivot-shift test has particular clinical importance because greater preoperative pivot-shift has shown to be associated with residual post-operative pivot-shift after ACL reconstruction [33]. Moreover, residual pivot-shift after ACL reconstruction has shown to be associated with symptoms and functional outcomes [2]. Therefore, a better understanding of the pivot-shift phenomenon is considered clinically important.

Morphological factors have been attracting increased attention as important factors for unfavourable knee kinematics and ACL injury in recent years. Especially, steeper posterior tibial slope (PTS) has been recognised as a potential risk factor for ACL injury [7], ACL graft failure [29], and post-operative static anterior tibial translation [19]. In terms of anterolateral rotatory knee laxity, several studies have shown that steeper PTS is associated with a high-grade pivot-shift which was evaluated by subjective grading [3, 4, 31]. Another study has shown that not only lateral PTS but also lateral-medial slope asymmetry were risk factors for concomitant posterolateral meniscal root tears in ACL injuries, suggesting lateral-medial slope asymmetry causes tibiofemoral rotation and increases the load on the posterolateral meniscus root [17]. However, an association between PTS and preoperative pivot-shift has not been fully elucidated, and the evidence of quantitative evaluation of the pivot-shift test was still lacking. Thus, the association between PTS/ lateral-medial slope asymmetry and pivot-shift phenomenon remains unknown.

Recently, the usefulness of quantitative evaluation systems for assessing anterolateral rotatory knee laxity has been reported [10, 21], and an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS) is one of these systems [1, 8, 12, 20, 24]. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between PTS/lateral-medial slope asymmetry and preoperative pivot-shift. It was hypothesised that steeper lateral PTS and greater lateral-medial slope asymmetry would be associated with greater tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test which was measured using the EMS.

Materials and methods

Study design and population

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kobe University (ID: B190055). Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the present study.

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. ACL-injured patients who underwent ACL reconstruction at our institution between January 2017 and March 2021 were prospectively enrolled. A total of 146 patients of ACL reconstructions were performed. Revision ACL reconstruction, age at the time of injury was 13 years or younger, patients with a history of injury to the ipsilateral knee joint, concomitant ligament injuries with ACL injury, no data of the pivot-shift test measured by the EMS, no available CT scan, and/or more than one year from injury to surgery, were excluded. As a result, 50 unilateral ACL-injured patients (mean age: 28.0 ± 11.4 years, male/female: 29/21) who underwent ACL reconstruction were included in the present study. A detailed flowchart is shown in Fig. 1. Among these patients, 37 patients with concomitant meniscus injuries (lateral meniscus: 18, medial meniscus: 13, lateral and medial menisci: 6) and 11 patients with concomitant cartilage injuries (medial femoral condyle: 8, lateral tibial plateau: 1, trochlea: 1, lateral femoral condyle and lateral tibial plateau: 1) were included.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of patient enrollment

Full size image

Computed tomography protocol and measurement of PTS

Post-operative CT scans were taken approximately two weeks after ACL reconstruction to evaluate tunnel locations. The knee was scanned from 5 cm proximal to the femoral epicondyle to 5 cm distal to the tibial tubercle using 64-slice MDCT (Aquilion 64; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). The slice thickness was 0.5 mm and one slice of the post-operative MDCT image consisted of 512 × 512 voxels. Multi-planar reconstruction was performed to obtain sagittal slices of the knee joint.

Medial and lateral PTS (°) was measured respectively as previously reported [14]. Briefly, the central sagittal CT image was selected based on (1) the intercondylar eminence, (2) the anterior and posterior cortices appeared in a concave shape, and (3) the attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament, and tibial axis was determined by connecting the centroids of two circles fitting the tibial shaft (Fig. 2a). A first circle was fitted to the anterior, posterior, and cranial cortexes of proximal tibia, and a second circle was fitted distally tangential to the anterior and posterior cortexes, with its centre placed on the border of the first circle. The centre of the lateral and medial tibial plateau was selected using a coronal CT image, and the medial and lateral PTS were determined by the angle between the axis perpendicular to the tibial axis and the line connecting the two most proximal anterior and posterior subchondral bone surfaces (Fig. 2b, c). The lateral-medial slope asymmetry was calculated by subtracting medial PTS from lateral PTS (lateral-medial PTS). Two examiners (examiner 1 and examiner 2) independently measured lateral and medial PTS to assess the inter-rater reliability. The values of examiner 1 were used for the statistical analysis. Examiner 1 measured lateral and medial PTS twice with eight weeks interval to assess the intra-rater reliability.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Posterior tibial slope (PTS) measurements using CT images. The arrow indicates the angle of lateral and medial PTS

Full size image

Quantitative evaluation of the pivot-shift test

The pivot-shift test was performed five times prior to the surgeryunder general anaesthesia using the EMS. This system consists of a transmitter that produces an electromagnetic field and three electromagnetic receivers. The two receivers are firmly attached to the thigh and the lower leg, and represent the motion of the femur and tibia, respectively, after setting the coordinate system. Seven anatomic landmarks of lower limbs, including the greater trochanter of the femur, medial femoral epicondyle, lateral femoral epicondyle, the intersection of the medial collateral ligament and knee joint line, fibula head, medial malleoli, and lateral malleoli, were digitized using the third receiver by the surgeon who performed ACL reconstruction, and their three-dimensional positions were recorded relative to the positions of the two receivers on the lower limb. Relative movement between the two receivers during knee motion can be converted to six-degrees-of-freedom knee kinematics in accordance with the Grood and Suntay coordinate system [6]. Tibial acceleration (m/s2) during posterior reduction of the tibia was calculated from the data of anteroposterior translation during the pivot-shift test, and the maximum value just before the pivot-shift phenomenon was used for the analysis as previously reported [12, 13, 24]. The average of three medians was used for the analysis.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [16]. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used for the normality test. All the PTS parameters (lateral PTS, medial PTS, and lateral-medial slope asymmetry) were normally distributed; therefore, Pearson correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between each PTS parameter (medial PTS, lateral PTS, and lateral-medial slope asymmetry) and tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. A priori sample size calculation using G*power 3.1 (Christian Albrecht University, Kiel, Germany) showed that 29 subjects were required to detect a moderate correlation (0.50), assuming a power of 0.80 and an alpha error of 0.05.

Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for lateral and medial PTS. In reference to a previous study, the categorisation of ICC scores was based on the 95% confidence interval (CI) and determined as a priori, whereby ICC < 0.50 indicates poor agreement, 0.50 ≤ ICC < 0.75 indicates moderate agreement, 0.75 ≤ ICC < 0.90 indicates good agreement, and ICC ≥ 0.90 indicates excellent agreement [18].

Results

The medial PTS was 4.9° (95% CI: 4.3 to 5.5, range: 0.9 to 9.6), and the lateral PTS was 5.2° (95% CI: 4.7 to 5.7, range: 1.2 to 9.6). The inter-rater ICCs of medial and lateral PTS were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71 to 0.88) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76 to 0.90), indicating moderate to good and good to excellent agreement respectively. The intra-rater ICCs of medial and lateral PTS were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.91) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.93), indicating good to excellent agreement. The lateral-medial slope asymmetry was 0.3° (95% CI: -0.2 to -0.8, range: -2.9 to 3.8). The tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test in the ACL-injured knee was 1.6 m/s2 (95% CI: 1.3 to 1.9, range: 0.1–4.5). While no significant correlation was observed between preoperative tibial acceleration and medial PTS (r = 0.06, p = 0.70) (Fig. 3a), preoperative tibial acceleration was moderately correlated with lateral PTS (r = 0.436, p < 0.01) (Fig. 3b), and lateral-medial slope asymmetry (r = 0.443, p < 0.01) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation between posterior tibial slope (PTS) and tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test. a No significant correlation was observed between preoperative tibial acceleration and medial PTS (r = 0.06, p = 0.70). b Tibial acceleration positively correlated with lateral PTS (r = 0.436, p < 0.01)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Correlation between lateral-medial slope asymmetry and tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test. Tibial acceleration positively correlated with lateral-medial slope asymmetry (r = 0.443, p < 0.01)

Full size image

Discussion

Preoperative tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test was positively correlated with lateral PTS and lateral-medial slope asymmetry in ACL-injured knees, which supported the hypothesis. This suggests that the magnitude of the preoperative pivot-shift appears to be associated with the bony morphology of the tibial plateau, and especially lateral tibial plateau and the difference in lateral and medial PTS. Thus, surgeons should be aware that not only lateral PTS but also lateral-medial slope asymmetry are the factors associating with preoperative anterolateral rotatory knee laxity in ACL injury. Special attentions will be needed in ACL-injured patients with steep lateral PTS and large lateral-medial PTS asymmetry.

The pivot-shift phenomenon is described as forward subluxation of the lateral tibial plateau on the femoral condyle in extension, and a spontaneous and sudden reduction in flexion. To detect this pivot-shift phenomenon, the pivot-shift test is the most commonly used clinical examination [22]. The preoperative pivot-shift test has particular clinical importance because greater preoperative pivot-shift is shown to be associated with residual post-operative pivot-shift after ACL reconstruction [33]. Moreover, residual post-operative pivot-shift after ACL reconstruction has been shown to associate with symptoms and poor functional outcomes [2], and could be associated with posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis [15]. Therefore, a better understanding of the pivot-shift phenomenon is considered clinically important to prevent the residual post-operative pivot-shift and subsequent complications or worsening of clinical outcomes.

Several factors have been shown to be associated with tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test, which was measured by the EMS. Nishida et al. reported that chronicity (more than one year after ACL injury) and lateral meniscal injury were associated with increased tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test in ACL-deficient knees [25], and another study has shown that unrepaired lateral meniscus injury during ACL reconstruction is associated with residual pivot-shift phenomenon one year after surgery [11]. Moreover, previous studies have shown that anterolateral complex injury does not significantly affect anterolateral rotatory laxity in ACL-deficient knees by using the EMS in cadaveric and clinical studies [1, 20]. In the present study, patients with concomitant meniscus injuries were included, however, there was no significant differences in the tibial acceleration between with and without lateral meniscus injuries. Other studies have shown that generalized joint laxity, knee hyperextension, female sex, meniscal tear, anterolateral complex injury, and bony morphology, including small lateral femoral condyle and greater PTS, were the factors associated with greater anterolateral rotatory knee laxity in ACL-deficient knees by using accelerometers or iPad systems, which can also quantify the pivot-shift [23, 26,27,28, 32]. In addition to these factors, the present study has shown that tibial bony morphology, especially lateral PTS and lateral-medial slope asymmetry, is associated with the magnitude of the preoperative pivot-shift.

Some previous studies have shown that a steeper PTS is a risk factor for a high-grade pivot-shift test [3, 4, 27]. Batty et al. analyzed 618 ACL-injured patients and found that PTS > 9°, measured by lateral plain radiograph, was one of the six factors associated with high-grade pivot-shift [4]. Another study has shown that lateral PTS measured by MRI was significantly greater in a “high-grade rotatory laxity” group (9.3° ± 3.4°) compared to a “low-grade rotatory laxity” group (6.1° ± 3.7°) based on quantitatively assessed pivot-shift test with the image analysis using an iPad [27]. A significant association has also been reported between lateral PTS > 9° and high-grade pivot-shift, and anterolateral ligament injury, while medial PTS was not significantly different between low-grade and high-grade groups [3]. However, as limitations of the previous studies, the association between medial–lateral PTS asymmetry and the pivot-shift was not assessed, and only one study [27] quantitatively assessed pivot-shift test by using iPad image analysis [10] among the three studies [3, 4, 27]. The present study found that not only lateral PTS but also medial–lateral PTS asymmetry were significantly correlated with tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test, which is a novel finding compared to the previous studies [3, 4, 27].

Greater lateral-medial slope asymmetry indicates that lateral PTS is steeper than medial PTS. Regarding the lateral-medial slope asymmetry, one study proposed a mechanism that an axial loading force would be more likely to cause the lateral side of the femur to slide posteriorly off of the steep lateral tibial plateau, using the flat medial tibial plateau as a pivot point [30], and thus greater pivot-shift phenomenon may occur in the knee with steeper lateral PTS as well as the greater lateral-medial slope asymmetry. The present finding could be supported by this proposed mechanism. One previous study has shown that lateral-medial slope asymmetry was a risk factor for concomitant lateral meniscus posterior root tears in ACL injuries [17], though it did not investigate the relationship with the pivot-shift. Therefore, the present study will add valuable knowledge to the literature.

The present study has some limitations. First, the present study is a retrospective analysis, and the number of subjects was relatively small and the rate of excluded patients was high, which may have caused selection bias. But, a prior power analysis indicated that the current number of subjects was sufficient to detect a moderate correlation. Second, the measurement of PTS was performed by using CT images, and PTS considering the articular cartilage and meniscal slope could not be measured in the present study. However, preoperative MRI scans were often performed at other clinics and hospitals and the quality was not consistent, while CT scans were performed at our hospital and the quality was consistent. Third, the maneuver of the pivot-shift test was performed by several experienced surgeons. A previous study demonstrated that instruction of a standardized pivot-shift test maneuver to multiple examiners could provide a more consistent quantitative evaluation [9], and the influence on the results would have been minimal. Finally, side-to-side difference in tibial acceleration was not determined, which would have been of interest. However, tibial acceleration in the ACL-injured/reconstructed knees have been consistently used in the previous studies, thus we have followed this approach in the present study [1, 8, 12, 20, 24].

Conclusions

Steeper lateral PTS and greater lateral-medial slope asymmetry were correlated with greater preoperative tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test in ACL-injured knees. These findings improve our understanding of anterolateral rotatory knee laxity by linking tibial bony morphology to quantitative measurement of pivot-shift phenomenon. Surgeons should be aware that lateral PTS, as well as lateral-medial slope asymmetry, may affect preoperative anterolateral rotatory knee laxity in ACL injury.

Availability of data and materials

Datasets generated or analyzed during this study are not publicly available due to privacy concerns. However, they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Araki D, Matsushita T, Hoshino Y, Nagai K, Nishida K, Koga H et al (2019) The anterolateral structure of the knee does not affect anterior and dynamic rotatory stability in anterior cruciate ligament injury: quantitative evaluation with the electromagnetic measurement system. Am J Sports Med 47(14):3381–3388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayeni OR, Chahal M, Tran MN, Sprague S (2012) Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(4):767–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bargagliotti M, Benazzo F, Bellemans J, Truijen J, Pietrobono L, Formagnana M et al (2019) The role of the posterolateral tibial slope in the rotational instability of the knee in patients affected by a complete isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury: its value in the decision-making process during the anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Joints 7(3):78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Batty LM, Firth A, Moatshe G, Bryant DM, Heard M, McCormack RG et al (2021) Association of ligamentous laxity, male sex, chronicity, meniscal injury, and posterior tibial slope with a high-grade preoperative pivot shift: a post hoc analysis of the STABILITY study. Orthop J Sports Med 9(4):232596712110000030

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bayer S, Meredith SJ, Wilson K, De Sa D, Pauyo T, Byrne K et al (2020) Knee morphological risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102(8):703–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105(2):136–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Mansouri H, Gill B, Slauterbeck JR, Schutt RC et al (2010) Shallow medial tibial plateau and steep medial and lateral tibial slopes: new risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 38(1):54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hiroshima Y, Hoshino Y, Miyaji N, Tanaka T, Araki D, Kanzaki N et al (2020) No difference in postoperative rotational laxity after ACL reconstruction in patients with and without anterolateral capsule injury: quantitative evaluation of the pivot-shift test at 1-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(2):489–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoshino Y, Araujo P, Ahlden M, Moore CG, Kuroda R, Zaffagnini S et al (2012) Standardized pivot shift test improves measurement accuracy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(4):732–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoshino Y, Araujo P, Ahldén M, Samuelsson K, Muller B, Hofbauer M et al (2013) Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift by image analysis using the iPad. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(4):975–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoshino Y, Hiroshima Y, Miyaji N, Nagai K, Araki D, Kanzaki N et al (2020) Unrepaired lateral meniscus tears lead to remaining pivot-shift in ACL-reconstructed knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(11):3504–3510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yagi M, Mizuno K, Yamaguchi M et al (2007) In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am J Sports Med 35(7):1098–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoshino Y, Miyaji N, Nishida K, Nishizawa Y, Araki D, Kanzaki N et al (2019) The concomitant lateral meniscus injury increased the pivot shift in the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(2):646–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hudek R, Schmutz S, Regenfelder F, Fuchs B, Koch PP (2009) Novel measurement technique of the tibial slope on conventional MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(8):2066–2072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jonsson H, Riklund-Åhlström K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75(5):594–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3):452–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolbe R, Schmidt-Hebbel A, Forkel P, Pogorzelski J, Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ (2019) Steep lateral tibial slope and lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry are risk factors for concomitant posterolateral meniscus root tears in anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(8):2585–2591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Y, Hong L, Feng H, Wang Q, Zhang J, Song G et al (2014) Posterior tibial slope influences static anterior tibial translation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 42(4):927–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miyaji N, Hoshino Y, Tanaka T, Nishida K, Araki D, Kanzaki N et al (2019) MRI-determined anterolateral capsule injury did not affect the pivot-shift in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(11):3426–3431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Musahl V, Griffith C, Irrgang JJ, Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Lopomo N et al (2016) Validation of quantitative measures of rotatory knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 44(9):2393–2398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Musahl V, Karlsson J (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament tear. N Engl J Med 380(24):2341–2348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Musahl V, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Costello J, Arner JW, Fu FH, Hoshino Y et al (2016) The influence of meniscal and anterolateral capsular injury on knee laxity in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 44(12):3126–3131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagai K, Hoshino Y, Nishizawa Y, Araki D, Matsushita T, Matsumoto T et al (2015) Quantitative comparison of the pivot shift test results before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by using the three-dimensional electromagnetic measurement system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(10):2876–2881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nishida K, Matsushita T, Hoshino Y, Araki D, Matsumoto T, Niikura T et al (2020) The influences of chronicity and meniscal injuries on pivot shift in anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knees: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Arthroscopy 36(5):1398–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pfeiffer TR, Kanakamedala AC, Herbst E, Nagai K, Murphy C, Burnham JM et al (2018) Female sex is associated with greater rotatory knee laxity in collegiate athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(5):1319–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Abebe ES, Johnson P, Labrum J, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ et al (2017) Increased lateral tibial slope predicts high-grade rotatory knee laxity pre-operatively in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(4):1170–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saita Y, Schoenhuber H, Thiébat G, Ravasio G, Pozzoni R, Panzeri A et al (2019) Knee hyperextension and a small lateral condyle are associated with greater quantified antero-lateral rotatory instability in the patients with a complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(3):868–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Salmon LJ, Heath E, Akrawi H, Roe JP, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA (2018) 20-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: the catastrophic effect of age and posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 46(3):531–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simon RA, Everhart JS, Nagaraja HN, Chaudhari AM (2010) A case-control study of anterior cruciate ligament volume, tibial plateau slopes and intercondylar notch dimensions in ACL-injured knees. J Biomech 43(9):1702–1707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Song GY, Zhang H, Wang QQ, Zhang J, Li Y, Feng H (2016) Risk factors associated with grade 3 pivot shift after acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 44(2):362–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sundemo D, Blom A, Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Lopomo NF, Zaffagnini S et al (2018) Correlation between quantitative pivot shift and generalized joint laxity: a prospective multicenter study of ACL ruptures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(8):2362–2370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamamoto Y, Tsuda E, Maeda S, Naraoka T, Kimura Y, Chiba D et al (2018) Greater laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament–injured knee carries a higher risk of postreconstruction pivot shift: intraoperative measurements with a navigation system. Am J Sports Med 46(12):2859–2864

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Editage (Cactus Communications) for the professional English proof reading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan

    Kiminari Kataoka, Kanto Nagai, Yuichi Hoshino, Masashi Shimabukuro, Kyohei Nishida, Noriyuki Kanzaki, Takehiko Matsushita & Ryosuke Kuroda

Authors
  1. Kiminari Kataoka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kanto Nagai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuichi Hoshino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masashi Shimabukuro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kyohei Nishida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Noriyuki Kanzaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takehiko Matsushita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ryosuke Kuroda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions to (1) the conception and design of the study, or acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; (3) final approval of the version to be submitted; and (4) agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately resolved. The specific contributions of the authors are as follows:

(1) Conception and design of the work; Kiminari Kataoka (K.K.), Kanto Nagai (K.N.1), Yuichi Hoshino (Y.H.), Noriyuki Kanzaki (N.K.), Takehiko Matsushita (T.M.), and Ryosuke Kuroda (R.K.)

(2) Acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work: K.K., K.N.1, Y.H., Masashi Shimabukuro (M.S.), Kyohei Nishida (K.N.2), and T.M.

(3) Drafting the article: K.K., K.N.1

(4) Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: K.K., K.N.1, Y.H., T.M., and R.K.

(5) Final approval of the version to be published: K.K., K.N.1, Y.H., M.S., K.N.2, N.K., T.M., and R.K.

(6) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: K.N.1, Y.H., T.M., and R.K.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanto Nagai.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kobe University.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the present study.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest in the authorship and publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kataoka, K., Nagai, K., Hoshino, Y. et al. Steeper lateral posterior tibial slope and greater lateral-medial slope asymmetry correlate with greater preoperative pivot-shift in anterior cruciate ligament injury. J EXP ORTOP 9, 117 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00556-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00556-x

Keywords