Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparative studies reporting range of motion and functional outcome for condylar-stabilised (CS) prosthesis in primary total knee arthroplasty

From: Similar outcomes including maximum knee flexion between mobile bearing condylar-stabilised and fixed bearing posterior-stabilised prosthesis: a case control study

Study

CS group

Control group

Prosthesis

Follow-up

CS group outcomes

Control group outcomes

Current study

160 (mobile)

316 PS (fixed)

SCORE II

3 years

ROM 117°

IKS function 83.9

IKS Knee 85.6

ROM 119°

IKS function 85.3

IKS Knee 85.6

Lutzner (2021) [25]

RCT

60 (fixed)

62 (PS fixed)

Columbus

5 years

Intra-op. ROM 112.2°

SF-36 physical 42.3

OKS 42

UCLA 4

Intra-op. ROM 115.1°

SF-36 physical 37.9

OKS 41

UCLA 4

Akti (2021) [7]

RCT

33 (fixed)

33 PS (fixed)

Vanguard

1 year

ROM 128.7°

KSS ‘no difference’

ROM 133.9°

KSS ‘no difference’

Hinarejos (2021) [30]

RCT

CS Triathlon* (29)

CS U2** (30)

PS Triathlon* (29)

PS U2** (29)

Triathlon and U2

1 year

ROM* 112.8°

ROM** 109.3°

KSS total* 171.5

KSS total** 172.2

ROM* 116.5°

ROM** 113.5°

KSS total* 178.1

KSS total** 169.7

Kim (2021) [31]

RCT

50 (fixed)

50 PS (fixed)

Persona

2 years

ROM 126.5°

WOMAC 14.3

KSS function 110.8

KSS pain 52.2

ROM 127.4°

WOMAC 14.5

KSS function 108.5

KSS pain 51.2

Han (2020) [18]

RCT

34 (fixed)

34 PS (fixed)

Triathlon

5 years

ROM 115°

Knee society knee 95

ROM 124°

Knee society knee 93

Stirling (2019) [32]

Retrospective cohort

54 (fixed)

364 CR (fixed)

Triathlon

1 year

Pain VAS 64.5

OKS 33.2

Pain VAS 70.6

OKS 34.6

Jang (2019) [20]

RCT

45 (fixed)

45 PS (fixed)

Vanguard

2 years

ROM 130.1°

KSS 157.1

WOMAC 27.1

129.9°

KSS 156.5

WOMAC 26.6

Song (2017) [33]

RCT

38 (fixed)

38 CR (fixed)

e.motion

3 years

ROM 130.8°

HSS 94.3

WOMAC 25.2

KS Knee Society 92.3

ROM 128.7°

HSS 93.0

WOMAC 24.0

KS Knee Society 89.6

Fritzsche (2017) [19]

Case control

40 (fixed)

40 PS (fixed)

Columbus

Intra-op.

ROM 118.2°

ROM 124.4°

Kim (2016) [21]

RCT

42 (mobile)

40 PS (mobile)

e-motion

3 years

ROM 123.2°

WOMAC/HSS/KSS ‘no difference’

ROM 124.1°

WOMAC/HSS/KSS ‘no difference’

Minoda (2016) [29]

Case control

41 (mobile)

41PS (fixed)

Vanguard

3 years

ROM 129°

ROM 130°

Sur (2015) [9]

RCT

28 (fixed)

28 PS (fixed)

Triathlon

5 years

ROM 135.8°

Knee society score 114.8

WOMAC 62.7

ROM 133.6°

Knee society score 113.0

WOMAC 63.7

Machhindra (2015) [34]

Retrospective cohort

103 (mobile)

99 PS (mobile)

e. motion

2 years

ROM 126°

AKS function 95.0

AKS knee 92.7

ROM 131°

AKS function 93.2

AKS knee 92.5

Parsley (2006) [26]

Retrospective cohort

88 (fixed)

121 PS (fixed)

Sulzer NK-II Ultra congruent, UC

 

ROM 116.7°

Knee score 86.3

Knee function score 64.5

Satisfied 94.5%

ROM 119.9°

Knee score 84.5

Knee function score 64.0

Satisfied 98.8%

Uvehammer (2001) [27]

RCT

25 (fixed)

22 PS (fixed)

DePuy AMK

2 years

ROM 110°

HSS 88

ROM 110°

HSS 90

Laskin (2000) [22]

RCT

48 (fixed)

PS 62 (fixed)

Genesis II

1 year

ROM 115°

AKS function 95.0

AKS knee 60

ROM 115°

AKS function 95.0

AKS knee 65

  1. ROM Range of motion, HSS Hospital for special surgery, AKS American knee society, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, KS Knee society, PS posterior stabilised, RCT randomised control trial