Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Download PDF
  • Original Paper
  • Open access
  • Published:

Middle trapezius transfer for treatment of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears- anatomical feasibility study

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics volume 8, Article number: 5 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical feasibility of a middle trapezius transfer below the acromion for treatment of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears.

Methods

This study involved 20 human cadaveric shoulders in 10 full-body specimens. One shoulder in each specimen was dissected and assessed for muscle and tendon extent, force vectors, and distance to the neurovascular structures. The opposite shoulder was used to evaluate the surgical feasibility of the middle trapezius transfer via limited skin incisions along with an assessment of range of motion and risk of neurovascular injury following transfer.

Results

The harvested acromial insertion of the middle trapezius tendon showed an average muscle length of 11.7 ± 3.0 cm, tendon length of 2.7 ± 0.9 cm, footprint length of 4.3 ± 0.7 cm and footprint width of 1.4 ± 0.5 cm. The average angle between the non-transferred middle trapezius transfer and the supraspinatus was 33 ± 10° in the transversal plane and 34 ± 14° in the coronal plane. The mean distance from the acromion to the neurovascular bundle was 6.3 ± 1.3 cm (minimum: 4.0 cm). During surgical simulation there was sufficient excursion of the MTT without limitation of range of motion in a retracted scapular position but not in a protracted position. No injuries to the neurovascular structures were noted.

Conclusion

Transfer of the acromial portion of the middle trapezius for replacement of an irreparable supraspinatus seems to be feasible in terms of size, vector, excursion, mobility and safety. However, some concern regarding sufficiency of transfer excursion remains as scapula protraction can increase the pathway length of the transfer.

Level of evidence

Basic Science Study/Anatomical Study

Introduction

Irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears (ISTT) with associated pain and loss of function are difficult to treat especially in a younger and high-demanding patient population. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty may not be the primary option for these patients due to limited longevity and high risk for complications [7, 16]. Therefore, different joint preserving procedures to reduce pain and improve function have been proposed including partial repair, superior capsular reconstruction, subacromial spacers, and interposition tendon grafting [6, 24, 32, 33]. Despite early clinical benefits, partial repair does not restore the former full coverage of the humeral head by the cuff and interposition grafting depends on the still available rotator cuff muscle tissue. Superior capsular reconstruction and subacromial spacers emerged with similar promising short-term results [23] but do not provide a dynamic biomechanical component.

Tendon transfers are common salvage procedures for irreparable rotator cuff tendon tears (IRCTT) featuring a dynamic biomechanical component and independence from residual muscle and tendon tissue of the torn musculotendinous unit. While several replacement options have been described for anterosuperior and posterosuperior IRCTTs [9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 19, 27, 28, 36], currently, no tendon transfer option other than the deltoid-flap procedure [2, 34] is available for replacing a ISTT.

While trapezius transfers have been previously used for paralytic patients due to brachial plexus palsies and deltoid muscle inactivity [1, 3,4,5, 13, 20, 22, 25, 29, 30], a transfer of the middle trapezius to treat patients with ISTT has so far not been described. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical feasibility of a middle trapezius transfer below the acromion to substitute the supraspinatus.

Methods

To evaluate the feasibility of the proposed middle trapezius transfer (MTT), an anatomic study was performed including 20 cadaveric shoulders in 10 fresh-frozen full-body specimens. One shoulder of each specimen was used to identify and assess the anatomical characteristics of the trapezius muscle and tendon by means of a complete anatomical dissection and the other side to evaluate the surgical feasibility of the MTT when performed via limited skin incisions.

All specimens were descended from the body-donor program of the institutional center of anatomy. Specimens included 6 female and 4 male donors with an average age at the time of death of 81 ± 7 years. Only specimen with intact rotator cuff and no evidence of advanced osteoarthritis were employed for this study.

Institutional ethical committee approval was obtained prior to the beginning of this study.

Anatomical assessment

With the specimens in prone position, the C7 spinous process was used as anatomic landmark to perform a wide T-shaped incision to the acromion and in line with the spine. The skin and the subcutaneous tissue were carefully removed to reveal the origin and insertion of the trapezius muscle. The trapezius muscle was separated into upper, middle and lower trapezius based on the definition by Omid et al. who use the triangular aponeurosis as reference to identify the middle trapezius [26]. The rostral and caudal extend of the separate muscle portions was noted. Muscle fibers of the upper, middle and lower trapezius were followed towards lateral and their insertions were analyzed by noting the anatomical landmarks. Furthermore, the length of the muscular and tendinous portions as well as the width at origin, insertion, and the myotendinous junction of the three parts of the trapezius were quantified using a tape measure. Additionally, the length of the clavicle, acromion, and scapular spine was assessed.

After visual inspection regarding force vector, size, as well as proximity to the greater tuberosity, the ideal portion of the middle trapezius transfer (MTT) to replace ISTTs was identified to be the part which inserts medially at the acromion just posterior to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint and anterior to the spina scapulae (Fig. 1). After subperiosteal detachment from the acromion, the tendon thickness of the MTT was measured at the anterior, middle and posterior end and the tendon footprint length and width were determined. Next, the remaining trapezius muscle fibers were reflected off their scapular and clavicle insertion to expose the spinal accessory nerve as well as the superficial transverse cervical artery on the ventral muscle belly. The neurovascular route was then marked from superficial using several 18 gouge needles and the minimum distance from the acromial footprint to the neurovascular pathway was measured. The angle between the force vectors of the MTT and the underlying supraspinatus were determined in the transversal and coronal plane using a goniometer. An osteotomy between the spine of the scapula and the acromion was performed to expose the humeral head. The supraspinatus was detached from its footprint and the tendon thickness was measured at the anterior, middle and posterior end. The length and width of the footprint was noted. After performing the transfer, the shortest distance from the former acromial footprint to the neurovascular pathway as well as the vector angles were then re-assessed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Posterior view on the middle trapezius muscle with the specimen in prone position. The middle trapezius (between green lines) originates from the aponeurosis (purple line) and extends laterally until inserting into the lateral two thirds of the scapula spine and the acromion (black lines). It can be observed that the upper part of the middle trapezius curves posteriorly around the lateral clavicle and AC joint. The blue dashed lines mark the proposed harvesting site for a middle trapezius transfer (MTT) for treatment of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears

Full size image

Surgical feasibility

The second step investigated the surgical feasibility of the MTT with regard to the aforementioned anatomical structures. The clavicle, AC joint, acromion, and scapular spine were palpated and a 5 cm incision was performed parallel to the anterior border of the spino-acromial junction. The acromial insertion of the middle trapezius was identified and released subperiosteally. According to the safe zone established in the anatomical assessment, a limited longitudinal split of the middle trapezius of 3 cm was performed and the released tendinous portion was armed with two #2 non-absorbable sutures using Krackow stitches. Next, a deltoid split approach was completed and the supraspinatus tendon was excised. The armed MTT was then transferred underneath the acromion and attached to the former supraspinatus footprint using transosseous tunnels. After attachment, potential blockage of shoulder motion by the transfer was assessed. Finally, the trapezius muscle belly was dissected to expose and confirm the intactness of the neurovascular bundle.

Results

In most specimens the aponeurosis which defines the origin of the middle trapezius extended from the spinous process C5 (range C5-C7) to T3 (range T2-T5). While the upper trapezius origin could be traced to the external occipital protuberance in many cases, the most frequent caudal origin of the lower trapezius was the spinous process T10 (range T9-T12). Regarding its insertion, the upper trapezius attached to the lateral third of the clavicle in all cases. The middle trapezius insertion always included the entire medial edge of the acromion and approximately the lateral two thirds of the spine of the scapula. In three cases the middle trapezius insertion extended to the lateral clavicle as well. The lower trapezius involved the medial third of the spine of the scapula in all cases (Fig. 1).

The middle trapezius width was 11.4 ± 2.5 cm at origin, 8.5 ± 2.0 cm at the myotendinous junction, and 10.6 ± 3.0 at the insertion. The average middle trapezius muscle length was 11.7 ± 3.0 cm and the average middle trapezius tendon length was 2.7 ± 0.9 cm.

The footprint of the MTT had an average length of 4.3 ± 0.7 cm and a width of 1.4 ± 0.5 cm. The average thickness of the tendon was 0.4 ± 0.2 cm anteriorly, 0.5 ± 0.3 in the middle, and 0.5 ± 0.5 posteriorly. In comparison, the supraspinatus showed a mean footprint length of 2.6 ± 0.5 cm and width of 1.5 ± 0.7 cm as well as a tendon thickness of 0.4 ± 0.1 cm anteriorly, 0.4 ± 0.1 in the middle, and 0.5 ± 0.2 posteriorly. The average angle between the non-transferred MTT and the supraspinatus was 33 ± 10° in the transversal plane and 34 ± 14° in the coronal plane and after transfer 30 ± 13° in the transversal plane and 24 ± 9° in the coronal plane (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Axial view of a completely dissected and displaced middle trapezius transfer (yellow cord) which reveals the underlying supraspinatus (green cord) in close proximity and with a similar vector in the transversal plane

Full size image

The mean distance from the inner acromion edge to the neurovascular bundle was 6.3 ± 1.3 cm with a minimum of 4.0 cm. After transfer the mean distance from the inner acromion edge to the neurovascular bundle was 4.1 ± 1.2 cm with a minimum of 2.5 cm indicating an average lateral displacement of the accessory nerve of 2.1 ± 1.0 cm (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Axial view of a completely dissected middle trapezius transfer (yellow cord) after harvesting (a) and after transfer (b) below the acromion (dashed black line). The needle marks the furthest lateral position of the accessory nerve indicating the limits for mobilization of the middle trapezius transfer

Full size image

The surgical simulation of the middle trapezius transfer did not reveal any injury to the neurovascular bundle. After the release within the safe zone, the transfer had sufficient length to reach the footprint on the greater tuberosity in all cases with the scapula manually retracted into an approximate position which would be expected in a standing position. When the scapula was left in protraction as caused by the prone position of the specimens with the thorax resting on a wooden block, the footprint could usually not be reached. After transfer no blockage of motion by the transfer when moving the arm of the specimen in prone position but with retracted scapula was observed.

Discussion

Several tendon transfer options for irreparable rotator cuff tendon tears have been proposed [9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 19, 27, 28, 36]. Common transfer options include Pectoralis major and Latissimus dorsi for anterosuperior IRCTT and Latissimus dorsi and Lower trapezius for posterosuperior IRCTT. Even though it is the most frequently encountered pathology no tendon transfer options other than the deltoid flap procedure have been described so far for ISTTs. The goal of this study was to provide data on the anatomical feasibility of a partial transfer of the middle trapezius underneath the acromion as salvage option to treat ISTTs.

From an anatomical standpoint the trapezius muscle has a singular innervation by the accessory nerve (cranial nerve XI) and can be separated into three parts based on their origin above, at, or below the aponeurosis [26]. According to the study observations, the origins of the three parts of the trapezius as well as the extent of the aponeurosis along with its quite common variability were similar to a previous report [26]. When tracing the muscle fibers towards lateral, the upper trapezius inserts on the lateral clavicle, the middle trapezius mostly on the acromion and the lateral two thirds of the scapula spine, and the lower trapezius on the medial third of the scapula spine. Therefore, the acromial insertion can be attributed to the middle trapezius instead of the upper trapezius as stated contrary [17].

The trapezius has been highlighted as a tendon transfer option for IRCTTs previously. While the transfer of the upper trapezius instead of the pectoralis major transfer to replace an irreparable subscapularis tendon has rendered unsatisfactory outcomes [14], the transfer of the lower trapezius instead of the latissimus dorsi transfer to replace an irreparable infraspinatus tendon showed promising early results [11]. In addition, trapezius transfers have been performed since many years in patients with brachial plexus palsies and deltoid muscle insufficiencies in order to counteract abduction paralysis [1, 3,4,5, 13, 20, 22, 25, 29,30,31]. Early descriptions date even back to Hoffa in 1891, Lewis in 1910 and Lange in 1911 [8]. The described techniques mostly involve some form of osteotomy of the spine of the scapula, acromion, or clavicle with detachment of the deltoid, transposition of the acromion to the humerus, as well as reinsertion of the deltoid on the trapezius. The reported improvements in abduction seem minor at first, however, still can be considered quite impressive giving the adverse initial situation with true muscle paralysis including the deltoid muscle [1, 3,4,5, 13, 20, 22, 25, 29, 30]. The initial situation in patients with ISTTs usually involves pain as well as loss of strength and limited motion [35] but typically shows a still functioning deltoid muscle. Therefore, the rationale behind the introduced middle trapezius transfer, is to transpose the acromial portion of the middle trapezius through the subacromial outlet and re-attach it to the former footprint of the supraspinatus while keeping the deltoid and the acromion intact (Fig. 4). If successful, this transfer provides a viable replacement to the superior aspect of the rotator cuff, that mimics its characteristics in terms of tendon dimension and force vector according to our study results. This combination of static spacing and dynamic joint centering effect might combine the benefits of both, static concepts seen in subacromial spacers or superior capsular reconstruction and dynamic concepts like partial rotator cuff repairs and interposition grafting [6, 24, 32, 33].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Schematic drawing of the middle trapezius transfer (MTT) for treatment of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears. The figure shows a the native insertion of the acromial portion of the middle trapezius, b the subperiosteal detachment, and c the transposition through the subacromial outlet and re-attachment to the former footprint of the supraspinatus

Full size image

With the scapulae in a retracted position, the excursion of the musculotendinous unit seems sufficient without stressing the neurovascular supply and the transferred tendon does not appear to block motion in any direction due to excessive tension or notching. However, scapula protraction which increases the pathway length between origin and new insertion of the transfer at the greater tuberosity remains a concern. Therefore, the necessity for graft interposition in order to lengthen the transfer in potential clinical application in some cases cannot be excluded. This necessity of graft interposition could potentially be dynamically evaluated intraoperatively. In any case an extensive subperiosteal detachment of the tendon stump from the surface of the acromion seems to be of benefit in order to increase transfer length.

Form a surgical perspective, the MTT can be achieved via two incisions, one for the harvesting step, one for the fixation to the greater tuberosity, with the latter having potential to be performed arthroscopically. There is minimal risk for harming neurovascular structures during harvesting, transposition, and re-fixation of the tendon transfer due to the sufficient distance between tendon insertion and pedicle and limited lateral displacement of the nerve during transfer. However, separation of the harvested musculotendinous unit from the remainder of the trapezius should only be performed within the safe zones in order to protect the accessory nerve. When the harvesting is performed accurately, the loss of original function of the trapezius should be limited to a minimum as only a small portion of the entire muscle is transferred and the vector of pull of the transferred tissue remains similar. The size of the transfer can be increased by harvesting not only the acromial insertion but also a part of the spinal insertion in order to cover larger rotator cuff defects, however the further posterior the harvest site is extended the shorter that part of transfer becomes.

Due to the proximity of the middle trapezius that curves behind the AC joint, a critical step is the tendon harvest with potential risk of injury of the posterior AC joint capsule. A further possible pitfall is the rather short tendon stump of the MTT that warrants subperiosteal detachment from the acromion in order to provide sufficient length and tendon tissue to withstand suture rip-through. When armed with Krackow stitches sufficient suture stability was achieved in all specimens despite moderate tissue quality in these elderly specimens.

Limitations

First, this anatomical study could not determine the activation pattern of the trapezius muscle which is innervated by the accessory nerve in contrast to the supraspinatus muscle, which is innervated by the suprascapular nerve. Nevertheless, the middle trapezius muscle activates synergistically to the supraspinatus muscle during arm elevation [21, 37] which provides a favorable base for the patients’ adjustment to the muscle transfer.

Second, the force production of the trapezius muscle was not assessed in this study. However, Herzberg et al. showed that the portion of the trapezius that inserts at the acromion reaches approximately two thirds of the force production potential of the supraspinatus muscle [17].

Third, the use of fresh frozen cadavers improves the comparability of the measurement parameters to the in-vivo situation, however, differences regarding tendon excursion, size of the musculotendinous unit, and range of motion are likely especially considering the advanced age of the specimens. Fourth, the comparison of the vectors between the MTT and the supraspinatus is affected by scapula position due to the difference of origin of the two muscles. Nonetheless, this study has shown that the vector of the MTT itself did not change relevantly in both planes after transfer.

Conclusion

The results of this study confirm the anatomical feasibility of the transfer of the acromial portion of the middle trapezius for the treatment of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears. Size, vector, excursion, and mobility of the transfer seem to be suitable to replace an irreparable supraspinatus. However, some concern regarding sufficiency of transfer excursion remains as scapula protraction increases the pathway of the transfer. The surgical risk of harming neurovascular structures while performing the transfer seems to be minimal.

Availability of data and materials

Data can be made available upon request.

Abbreviations

ISTT:

Irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears

IRCTT:

Irreparable rotator cuff tendon tears

MTT:

Middle trapezius transfer

AC joint:

Acromioclavicular joint

References

  1. Altmann S, Fansa H, Schneider W (2006) Transfer of trapezius muscle for reconstruction of abduction of the shoulder. Orthopade 35(450–451):453–455

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apoil A, Augereau B (1985) Deltoid flap repair of large losses of substance of the shoulder rotator cuff. Chirurgie 111:287–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aziz W, Singer RM, Wolff TW (1990) Transfer of the trapezius for flail shoulder after brachial plexus injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:701–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger A, Becker MH (1994) Brachial plexus surgery: our concept of the last twelve years. Microsurgery 15:760–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bertelli JA (2011) Upper and lower trapezius muscle transfer to restore shoulder abduction and external rotation in longstanding upper type palsies of the brachial plexus in adults. Microsurgery 31:263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burkhart SS (1997) Partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears: the evolution of a concept. Orthop Clin North Am 28:125–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ek ET, Neukom L, Catanzaro S, Gerber C (2013) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 65 years old: results after five to fifteen years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:1199–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elhassan B, Bishop A, Shin A, Spinner R (2010) Shoulder tendon transfer options for adult patients with brachial plexus injury. J Hand Surg Am 35:1211–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elhassan B, Christensen TJ, Wagner ER (2014) Feasibility of latissimus and teres major transfer to reconstruct irreparable subscapularis tendon tear: an anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:492–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elhassan BT, Alentorn-Geli E, Assenmacher AT, Wagner ER (2016) Arthroscopic-Assisted Lower Trapezius Tendon Transfer for Massive Irreparable Posterior-Superior Rotator Cuff Tears: Surgical Technique. Arthrosc Tech 5:e981–e988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elhassan BT, Wagner ER, Werthel JD (2016) Outcome of lower trapezius transfer to reconstruct massive irreparable posterior-superior rotator cuff tear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:1346–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerber C, Vinh TS, Hertel R, Hess CW (1988) Latissimusdorsi transfer for the treatment of massive tears of the rotator cuff. A preliminary report. ClinOrthopRelat Res 232:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldner JL (1988) Strengthening of the partially paralyzed shoulder girdle by multiple muscle-tendon transfers. Hand Clin 4:323–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goutallier D, De Abreu L, Postel JM, Le Guilloux P, Radier C, Zilber S (2011) Is the trapezius transfer a useful treatment option for irreparable tears of the subscapularis? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:719–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grimberg J, Kany J, Valenti P, Amaravathi R, Ramalingam AT (2015) Arthroscopic-assisted latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior cuff tears. Arthroscopy 31(599–607):e591

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G (2006) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1742–1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herzberg G, Urien JP, Dimnet J (1999) Potential excursion and relative tension of muscles in the shoulder girdle: relevance to tendon transfers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:430–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kany J, Guinand R, Croutzet P, Valenti P, Werthel JD, Grimberg J (2016) Arthroscopic-assisted latissimus dorsi transfer for subscapularis deficiency. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26:329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kany J, Selim HA (2020) Combined Fully Arthroscopic Transfer of Latissimus Dorsi and Teres Major for Treatment of Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears. Arthrosc Tech 9:e147–e157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karev A (1986) Trapezius transfer for paralysis of the deltoid. J Hand Surg Br 11:81–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly BT, Williams RJ, Cordasco FA, Backus SI, Otis JC, Weiland DE et al (2005) Differential patterns of muscle activation in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kotwal PP, Mittal R, Malhotra R (1998) Trapezius transfer for deltoid paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:114–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Makovicka JL, Chung AS, Patel KA, Deckey DG, Hassebrock JD, Tokish JM (2020) Superior capsule reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes by graft type. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29:392–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mihata T, Lee TQ, Watanabe C, Fukunishi K, Ohue M, Tsujimura T et al (2013) Clinical results of arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 29:459–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mir-Bullo X, Hinarejos P, Mir-Batlle P, Busquets R, Carrera L, Navarro A (1998) Trapezius transfer for shoulder paralysis. 6 patients with brachial plexus injuries followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop Scand 69:69–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Omid R, Cavallero MJ, Granholm D, Villacis DC, Yi AM (2015) Surgical anatomy of the lower trapezius tendon transfer. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:1353–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paladini P, Campi F, Merolla G, Pellegrini A, Porcellini G (2013) Pectoralis minor tendon transfer for irreparable anterosuperior cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:e1-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Resch H, Povacz P, Ritter E, Matschi W (2000) Transfer of the pectoralis major muscle for the treatment of irreparable rupture of the subscapularis tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:372–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruhmann O, Schmolke S, Bohnsack M, Carls J, Wirth CJ (2005) Trapezius transfer in brachial plexus palsy. Correlation of the outcome with muscle power and operative technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:184–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruhmann O, Wirth CJ, Gosse F, Schmolke S (1998) Trapezius transfer after brachial plexus palsy. Indications, difficulties and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:109–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Saha AK (1967) Surgery of the paralysed and flail shoulder. Acta Orthop Scand;https://doi.org/10.3109/ort.1967.38.suppl-97.01. Suppl 97:95–90

  32. Savarese E, Romeo R (2012) New solution for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears: the subacromial “biodegradable spacer.” Arthrosc Tech 1:e69-74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sundine MJ, Malkani AL (2002) The use of the long head of triceps interposition muscle flap for treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Plast ReconstrSurg 110:1266–1272 (discussion 1273–1264)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Takagishi N (1978) The new operation for the massive rotator cuff rupture. J Jap Orthop Assoc 52:775–780

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tokish JM, Alexander TC, Kissenberth MJ, Hawkins RJ (2017) Pseudoparalysis: a systematic review of term definitions, treatment approaches, and outcomes of management techniques. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:e177–e187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr (1997) Operative treatment of irreparable rupture of the subscapularis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:722–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yoshizaki K, Hamada J, Tamai K, Sahara R, Fujiwara T, Fujimoto T (2009) Analysis of the scapulohumeral rhythm and electromyography of the shoulder muscles during elevation and lowering: comparison of dominant and nondominant shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:756–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. 

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    Philipp Moroder, Doruk Akgün, Lucca Lacheta, Kathi Thiele, Marvin Minkus, Nina Maziak, Thilo Khakzad, Christian Festbaum, Katja Rüttershoff, Sophia Ellermann & Victor Danzinger

  2. Department for Anatomy, Institute for Functional Anatomy, Center for Surgical-anatomical Training, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Torsten Weiss & Thomas Jöns

Authors
  1. Philipp Moroder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Doruk Akgün
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lucca Lacheta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kathi Thiele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marvin Minkus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nina Maziak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thilo Khakzad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Christian Festbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Katja Rüttershoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sophia Ellermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Torsten Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Thomas Jöns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Victor Danzinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PM had the study idea, drafted the manuscript and had the study supervision. DA, KT, MM, TK, TW and TJ carried out the anatomical dissection. LL and NM collected the data and provided data analysis. CF, KR, and SE prepared the data report forms and prepared the figures. VD made the study design and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Moroder.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval of the institutional ethical committee was obtained (EA4/104/20).

Consent for publication

Not applicable as this was an anatomical study.

Competing interests

None related to this study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moroder, P., Akgün, D., Lacheta, L. et al. Middle trapezius transfer for treatment of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears- anatomical feasibility study. J EXP ORTOP 8, 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00326-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00326-1

Keywords