Skip to main content

Bone ingrowth into open architecture PEEK interference screw after ACL reconstruction



Open or fenestrated interference screw design that allow bone ingrowth is a concept for improved bone healing to softtissue graft and bone filling in bone tunnels after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) The aim of the current study was to assess CT scanning evaluated bone ingrowth into an open architecture interference screws in the tibial tunnel of patients undergoing ACL with soft tissue grafts. It was hypothesized that open architecture interference screws would stimulate bone ingrowth into the screw cavities.


Twelve patients requiring ACLR were included. They underwent arthroscopic ACLR with semitendinosus−/gracilis tendon graft and an open architecture polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interference screw. The patients were scanned with a multi-slice CT scanner two weeks, six and twelve months postoperatively. On CT reconstruction slices bone ingrowth into the screw was measured. Subjective and objective clinical outcome international knee documentation committee score and instrumented knee laxity determination were collected.


At six months no implants demonstrated more than 10% bone ingrowth. At twelve months 42% (5/12) implants had more than 10% bone ingrowth (p = 0.009). The average bone filling into the screws was 7.7%. There was no tunnel widening or cyst formation seen in relation to any of the implants. Subjective IKDC score improved significantly from 50.6 baseline to 80.1 at 24 month follow-up. Preoperative side-to-side knee laxity improved from 3.7 (2.1) to 1.4 (1.2) mm at twelve months. There were no serious adverse events in relation to the new open architecture thread PEEK interference screw during or after hamstring ACL reconstruction.


The present study demonstrated that open architecture thread PEEK interference screw can stimulate bone ingrowth into the screws after soft tissue ACL reconstruction with at 12 months with an average bone filling into screws was 7.7%. Knee stability, functional, subjective and objective outcomes were similar to large volume ACL outcome studies.

Trial registration

The study was registered at ClinicalTrials # NCT02382341. 12-09-2014.

Level of evidence



Advances in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) techniques over the last three decades have resulted in 80–100% of patients reporting normal to nearly normal outcome scores following ACLR [16]. Despite these advances, it has been reported that 3–10% of ACL reconstructions fail [14]. A common factor found in revisions is the issue of fixation of the graft to the bone surface in the tibial and femoral tunnels [5, 17, 20]. The long-term success of ACL repair depends on its ability to heal in the bone tunnel [10].

Soft tissue grafts have been proven capable of similar functional and strength outcomes and with less donor site morbidity compared to patellar tendon autografts [25]. But according to recent registry and meta-analysis studies patellar tendon autografts have a significantly lower rate of graft failure and better knee stability than soft tissue graft [8, 9, 21]. The decreased stability of hamstring reconstructions compared to BTB could result from differences in graft properties that adversely affect the ability of the soft tissue graft to heal inside bone tunnels [15, 21].

Fixation of soft tissue ACL grafts in bone tunnels is commonly accomplished by interference screws. Interference screws are made from various materials, including metals, absorbable ceramics and inert polymers. Bio-absorbable screws offer advantages over metallic screws, including decreased graft trauma and better shear strength fixation [3]. However some bioabsorbable materials have been associated with bone resorption due to acidic degradations products [4]. Such bone resorption can cause cyst formation and tunnel widening resulting in increased graft laxity and failure [6]. So far no bioresorbable implant has proven the ability to induce bone formation during implant resorption as initially envisioned at conception for resorbable implants [23].

Another concept for combining improved healing to soft tissue graft with bone filling of the bone tunnels is interference screws with open or fenestrated design that allows bone ingrowth. The concept has been tested in an ovine animal model with resorbable screw material and bone ingrowth into screw perforations were demonstrated [11]. In the clinical setting, bone ingrowth into a soft tissue ACL graft interference screw could result in improved bone to graft healing and easier revision conditions after traumatic graft failure. This is due to improved bone stock and the potential benefit of avoiding screw removal since a low material density interference screw with bone ingrowth may just be drilled through at an optimal anatomical drilling direction.

No human clinical studies have investigated the bone ingrowth potential of open architecture interference screws.

Smith and Nephew has developed the Biosure Healicoil interference screw as a novel approach to interference screws. Made of non-absorbable but radiolucent Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) material, the screw features a fenestrated design providing circumferential contact with the tibial tunnel. The screw’s open profile displaces less surface area than a standard metal or PEEK interference screw while maintaining comparable insertion and fixation strengths. Furthermore, the open design of the Biosure Healicoil interference screw allows bone ingrowth of the bone tunnel without the uncertainty and delay from the resorption and remodeling processes of absorbable and osteoconductive screws.

The primary objective of the current study was to assess via CT scanning bone ingrowth into the Biosure Healicoil interference screw in the tibial tunnel of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with soft tissue grafts. It was hypothesized that the open architecture screws would result in bone ingrowth into screw voids.

Materials and methods

This study was a prospective case series. Patients requiring a soft tissue graft ACL reconstruction after ACL injury received a hamstring graft ACLR using the Biosure Healicoil PEEK Interference Screw for tibia fixation and followed for 24 months post-operatively. CT scan imaging evaluated bone ingrowth into the Biosure Healicoil Interference screw at two weeks, six and twelve months. Patient reported outcomes and knee stability was evaluated after six, twelve and 24 months. Men and women between the ages of 18 and 50 who presented with a unilateral torn ACL confirmed by functional testing who met the eligibility criteria were recruited. A total of twelve subjects were enrolled into the study. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient characteristics

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ACL tear requiring surgical reconstruction with semitendinosus and gracilis graft.

  • Willing and able to give voluntary informed consent to participate in this study.

  • Willing and able, in the opinion of the investigator, to cooperate with study procedures and willing to return to the study site for all post-operative study visits.

  • Subject between 18 and 50 years at the time of surgery.

  • ASA group 0–2 (limited medical illness).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision ACL reconstruction.

  • Cartilage injury (IKDC Grade IV lesion > 2 cm2).

  • Current malignant disease.

  • Rheumatoid arthritis.

  • Osteonecrosis or Avascular Necrosis or Ankylosing spondylitis.

  • Subject obese (Body Mass Index [BMI] > 35).

  • Subject pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the study.

  • Subject had received medical treatment within 6 weeks of enrollment with any of the following: Glucocorticoids or Growth hormone.

  • Participation in another investigational trial


All patients had ACL reconstruction using arthroscopically assisted technique. Gracilis and semitendinosus tendons were harvested through a small incision over the pes anserinus. All four strands were sutured separately with No 2 non resorbable sutures. The grafts were placed with an Endobutton CL implant (Smith&Nephew, Andover, MA, USA) for femoral fixation. The Endobutton loop length ensured that a minimum 25 mm of the graft was placed in the femoral tunnel.

Femoral drilling was performed through an anteromedial portal with the drillhole placed centrally in the femoral ACL footprint. A 55-degree oblique tibial drillhole into the anterior tibial cortex between the anterior edge of the medial collateral ligament and the tibial tuberosity was drilled ending in the center of the ACL tibial footprint. Drillhole diameter was sized according to the diameter of the four-strand graft with half millimeter incremenets The four-strand graft was pulled in place. In all patients, the tibial fixation was performed with the Biosure Healicoil interference screw (Smith&Nephew, Andover, USA) with a diameter of the tibial drillhole. The screw has an open thread design that allows bone ingrowth into the tread openings and screw center (Fig. 1). The screw is composed of polyetheretherketone (PEEK). The screw was placed just inside the tibial cortex for optimal graft compression and fixation in the tibial tunnel. Graft twisting or graft damage was visually inspected during screw positioning.

Fig. 1

The BIOSURE HEALICOIL PK interference screw implant. The implant is characterized by three central columns and an open thread architecture allowing bone ingrowth into in between threads and screw center

The incision was closed in layers and low suction drains were inserted into the joint and graft harvest area. The patients were discharged from the hospital 2–4 h postoperatively.

Postoperative rehabilitation

The knee was allowed free range of motion from day one, followed by isometric quadriceps and passive flexion exercises. Patients were allowed full weight bearing as tolerated by pain and effusion using crutches for the first two post-operative weeks. Stationary bike exercises were used from the fourth postoperative week and progressive quadriceps strengthening exercises were conducted from the sixth week. Running was allowed at three months postoperatively, followed by return to lateral actions and contact sports at twelve months postoperatively or later. Rehabilitation was physiotherapist supervised for three months and used criterion-based activity progression.

Outcome evaluation

CT scanning evaluated bone ingrowth into the Biosure Healicoil interference screw. Patient reported outcome and knee stability evaluation were performed after six, twelve and 24 months during a project control visit. An independent physiotherapist performed objective knee examinations.

Primary outcome CT scanning

The primary endpoint was visible bony ingrowth on six and twelve -month CT scans. CT scans to determine the presence of bone ingrowth into implant tread openings or central cavity were performed at two weeks, six and twelve months post-operatively. In order to be categorized as having bony ingrowth, a subject must have bone ingrowth of 4% or greater compared with baseline in the volume of the screw.

The patients were scanned in a supine position in a multislice CT-scanner (Brilliance 64-slice, Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH). Axial slices were made starting from the joint-space level to one centimeter distal to the cap of the screw. The scans were performed in high resolution with collimating on 64 × 0.625 mm, slice thickness 0.9 mm. Reformatting was performed a with C-filter resulting in a slice thickness of 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm spacing.

CT scanning analysis

The same HU was used across all subjects/timepoints. Hounsfield Unit (HU) threshold for bone (threshold value was determined based on the average histogram value for trabecular bone across multiple subjects and timepoints) to generate a single value. For each subject timepoint, the highest spatial resolution DICOM series was converted to a single volume (VFF file format). All other timepoints for this particular subject were then volumetrically registered to this realigned Timepoint A using a mutual information algorithm. The resulting registered volumes were then re-sampled to conform with the voxel resolution of the realigned Time-point A using tri-linear interpolation. In this manner, all of the subject images were aligned with a standard orientation, and within each subject data set all of the timepoints had the same spatial resolution. This enabled direct comparison of all imaging timepoints for all subjects. For analysis of bone volume within the tunnel, a model of the Biosure Healicoil screw (size-specific for each subject) was fitted to each subject’s CT volume (mutual information based spatial registration). Voxels representing bone within the screw volume were subsequently segmented using a fixed Bone volume (sum of segmented bone voxels) and screw volume were calculated (Fig. 2). In order to be categorized as having bony ingrowth, a subject must have bone ingrowth of 4% or greater in the screw volume compared to baseline. This to account for any minor bone material entering the screw threads during insertion. A 10% bone ingrowth compared to baseline was arbitrary chosen as a good bone ingrowth and ingrowth data are presented as both average bone ingrowth and proportions of good ingrowth. Tunnel widening was assessed by measuring tunnel diameter on the immediate post-op CT scanning to follow-up CT scanning.

Fig. 2

CT scanning images of characteristic bone ingrowth pattern. Three examples of average ingrowth at 6 and 12 months follow-up are shown

Secondary outcomes

Secondary endpoints were the following. Objective knee stability evaluated as maximal sagittal knee translation measured by KT-1000 arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) [2]. Pivot shift test with presentation of patients without a positive pivot shift test postoperatively. Subjective outcome scores as evaluated by subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score ranging from 0 to 100 with 100 being the score representing completely normal knee function [12]. Sports related knee function was evaluated by Tegner activity scale ranging from 0 to 10 with 10 being the score representing sports activity a professional soccer level [24].

Safety and adverse events

Adverse and serious adverse events were registreted throughout the follow-up period.

Prior to enrollment, all subjects gave informed consent. The study was approved by the local scientific ethical committee (Region XXXX Ethical Committee Approval no. M-20110138) and by the XXXX Data Protection Agency and conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Statistical analysis

Determination of sample size

CT scanning was used to document bone ingrowth at six and twelve months follow-up. A proportion of 50% of implants with bone ingrowth at twelve months was considered a clinically relevant outcome. Ten subjects were estimated to provide a 91% power for detecting a statistically significant difference (i.e. p < two-side alpha = 0.05) when a proportion of bone ingrowth of 5/10 was detected versus an assumed proportion of 10% (i.e. a proportion that was defined as clinically irrelevant) at twelve -month CT scans. To account for enrollment dropout, twelve subjects were planned to be enrolled thus providing a 20% oversampling with a likelihood of obtaining 10 subjects available for analysis.

Data presentation and comparisons

CT scannning data is presented as mean and standard deviations. For comparison of bone ingrowth two-tailed paired T-test was used. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. For data summaries, categorical and ordinal variables were summarized using frequency and percent. Continuous variables were summarized with the following summary statistics: number of observations, mean, median, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values. All analyses were performed using SAS versions 9.3 and 9.4.


The median patient age at the time of operation was 29 years (18–49 years). All patients were available for CT scannings at six, twelve and 24 months follow-up.

CT scanning bone ingrowth outcome

At 6 months no implant demonstrated more than 10% bone ingrowth. At twelve months 42% (5/12) implants had more than 10% bone ingrowth (p = 0.009) compared to no ingrowth. At 2 weeks (baseline) there was minor bone ingrowth average 0.9 (0.55) %. At six months, bone ingrowth averaged 3.1 (2.7)% and at twelve months bone ingrowth was 8.1% (4.5) (Fig. 2). The ingrowth average change from baseline to six months was 2.2 (2.8) % (P = 0.021) and at twelve months 7.7 (4.8)% (P = 0.002) Table 2. Representative CT images of bone ingrowth is presented in Fig. 3.

Table 2 Bone ingrowth data (% bone tissue inside screw) for all subjects at time zero, six and twelve months
Fig. 3

A graphically illustration of the three tibial volumens that are determined for CT evaluation of bone ingrowth into the Healicoil screws. a: Volumen of the tibial tunnel in the location of the Healicoil screw. b: Volume of the PEEK material of the Healicoil screw. c: Volumen of the new bone formation in the areas of screw voids. Bone ingrowth is determined as New bone volume C/Void volumen ab

There was no tunnel widening or cyst formation observed in any patients.

Clinical outcome

Subjective IKDC scores improved significantly from baseline to all follow-up time periods. The score at baseline was 50.6 and improved at 24 month follow-up to 80.1. The changes in the mean absolute values of the IKDC scores were statistically significant at both twelve months (23.1, p = 0.003) and 24 months (29.5, p < 0.001) (Table 3). Tegner Activity Scale scores also improved from a baseline mean level from median 2 to 4 at 24 months follow-up. At 24 months follow-up, 8 of 12 patients had a score of 4 or above. Most subjects (75%) had a baseline Tegner score of 2 (6 subjects) or 3 (3 subjects). Seven (7) of these subjects had improved by at least one point by six months; at twelve months all nine subjects’ improvement was one point or more and this was maintained through 24 months.

Table 3 Subjective IKDC score and Tegner Activty Scale scores at baseline and follow-up

Knee stability

Preoperative side to side knee laxity improved from 3.7 (2.1) 1.4 (1.2) mm (p = 0.004) at 12 months. A negative pivot shift was found in 11 patients and one patient had a slight positive pivot glide.

Adverse events

There were eleven reported adverse events during the 24 month study period. These were: (1) postoperative pain, (3) pain in knee, (5) swelling/synovitis and (2) extension deficit. All events except one extension deficit condition resolved spontaneously with rest or supplementary oral analgesic medicine.

In one case, the extension deficit developed into a serious adverse event as the extension deficit did not resolve within 8 weeks post-operatively. Arthroscopic debridement of local anterior scar tissue formation was performed resulting in normalization of range of motion.


The primary finding of the present study was that a clinically relevant bone ingrowth into an open architecture PEEK interference screw in the tibial tunnel of subjects undergoing ACL reconstruction with soft tissue grafts occurred in 5 of the twelve subjects with an average bone ingrowth of 7.2% at twelve months postoperatively. There is no other litterature from clinical studies that have investigated bone ingrowth into open architecture non-absorbable interference screws after ACL reconstruction. One animal study investigated bone ingrowth and fixation strength after six months of perforated polylactategluconicacid (PLGA) screws in a sheep model and found bone ingrowth in the perforations and a tendency to increase fixation strength of the perforated screw compared to non-perforated screws [11]. In a clinical study aiming to investigate screw resorption of a poly-DL- Lactide (PDLLA) screws, perforations of the screw were used to accelerate the resorption of the screw but bone ingrowth was not investigated. The screw demonstrated complete resorption after 30 months [1]. Another study investigated the long-term screw remodelling and bone ingrowth in composite hydroxyapatite-polylactide (HA-PLLA) screws area. The study found that the HA-PLLA material stimulated osteoconductivity resulting in almost complete screw bone ingrowth after five years with 30% ingrowth after one year [13]. The higher bone formation was possible due to the resorbable nature of the screw which is different from the present fenestrated screw where the screw material remains intact. This probably the main reason the potential higher bone formation in an absorbable screw.

Secondary objectives of the present study were to assess changes in IKDC scores and Tegner Activity Scale scores from baseline to twelve and 24 months postoperatively. At both time points, there was statistically significant improvement from baseline. The IKDC score at 24 months was 80 which was similar to several large volume registry ACLR outcome studies [19, 22]. Similarly, functional outcome Tegner Activity scale score was 4.6 Another secondary outcome was knee stability which was found to improve significantly from a preoperative sagital laxity of 3.7 mm to a twelve months postoperative laxity of 1.4 mm.

There were no adverse events in relation to the usage of the open architechture interference screw during hamstring ACL reconstruction. Importantly no events of graft damage or twisting were observed during screw positioning. During the follow-up period a number of adverse events were observed that were typical for the intraarticular reaction to an ACL reconstruction and none of these adverse events were considered related to the tibial implant.

A strength of the study is that high resolution CT scanning was used to evaluate bone ingrowth. CT scanning is the golden standard for assessing bone healing and formation [7]. Several other studies have used MRI for evaluation of screw resorption and bone formation after the usage of resorbable interference screw and MR scanning might be sufficient to identify screw remnants but has a poor ability to identify newly formed calcified tissue [1, 18].

The clinical relevance of the present study is that open architecture interference screws used for tibia fixation in soft tissue ACL reconstruction induces bone ingrowth in almost half of cases. The bone healing activity may result in improved implant fixation and better graft incorporation into the bone tunnel although this clinical study did not investigate these factors. An open architecture implant inducing bone ingrowth could be beneficial in revision situations. In cases of traumatic rerupture of the ACL graft, a bone tunnel with an open architecture graft fixation implant consisting of PEEK and with bone ingrowth would not require implant removal during ACL revision. Drilling a new tunnel for the revision graft could then be performed throught the implant at whatever optimized tunnel position desired.


The present study has some limitations. With only twelve patients included, the design was sufficient to describe the desired biological phenomenon of bone ingrowth but lack the ability to generate complete data for clinical outcomes such as knee stability, subjective patient reported outcomes and failure rates but the clinical outcome data are primary included to identify adverse events. Another limitation is that no control group was included, but as no other fenestrated screw exist it is hard to have a relevant control group. As ingrowth screws is a novel concept been investigated, then there is no established standard value for clinically relevant bone ingrowth that can be used as threshold in study. We therefore had to choose a threshold for clinically relevant bone ingrowth, which we then sat at 10%.


The present study demonstrated that open architecture thread PEEK interference screw can stimulate bone ingrowth into the screws after soft tissue ACL reconstruction with at twelve months with an average bone filling into screws was 7.7%. Knee stability, functional, subjective and objective outcomes were similar to large volume ACL outcome studies.

Availability of data and materials

Data are not available.


  1. 1.

    Achtnich A, Forkel P, Metzlaff S, Zantop T, Petersen W (2014) Degradation of poly-D-L-lactide (PDLLA) interference screws (Megafix (R)). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1147–1153

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Anderson AF, Snyder RB, Federspiel CF, Lipscomb AB (1992) Instrumented evaluation of knee laxity: a comparison of five arthrometers. Am J Sports Med 20:135–140

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Barber FA (2015) Biodegradable materials: anchors and interference screws. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 23:112–117

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Barber FA (2015) Complications of biodegradable materials: anchors and interference screws. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 23:149–155

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Carson EW, Anisko EM, Restrepo C, Panariello RA, O'Brien SJ, Warren RF (2004) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: etiology of failures and clinical results. J Knee Surg 17:127–132

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fauno P, Christiansen SE, Lund B, Lind M (2010) Cyst formation 4 years after ACL reconstruction caused by biogradable femoral transfixation: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1573–1575

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Foldager C, Jakobsen BW, Lund B, Christiansen SE, Kashi L, Mikkelsen LR et al (2010) Tibial tunnel widening after bioresorbable poly-lactide calcium carbonate interference screw usage in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:79–84

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Freedman KB, D'Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR Jr (2003) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 31:2–11

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gifstad T, Foss OA, Engebretsen L, Lind M, Forssblad M, Albrektsen G et al (2014) Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med 42:2319–2328

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gulotta LV, Rodeo SA (2007) Biology of autograft and allograft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 26:509–524

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hunt P, Unterhauser FN, Strobel MJ, Weiler A (2005) Development of a perforated biodegradable interference screw. Arthroscopy 21:258–265

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P et al (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Johnston M, Morse A, Arrington J, Pliner M, Gasser S (2011) Resorption and remodeling of hydroxyapatite-poly-L-lactic acid composite anterior cruciate ligament interference screws. Arthroscopy 27:1671–1678

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kuang GM, Yau WP, Lu WW, Chiu KY (2010) Osteointegration of soft tissue grafts within the bone tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be enhanced. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1038–1051

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lind M, Feller J, Webster KE (2009) Bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton or EndoButton continuous loop. Arthroscopy 25:1275–1280

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB (2009) The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:117–124

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB (2012) Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 40:1551–1557

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Macarini L, Murrone M, Marini S, Mocci A, Ettorre GC (2004) MRI in ACL reconstructive surgery with PDLLA bioabsorbable interference screws: evaluation of degradation and osteointegration processes of bioabsorbable screws. Radiol Med 107:47–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Magnussen RA, Granan LP, Dunn WR, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Brophy R et al (2010) Cross-cultural comparison of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction in the United States and Norway. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:98–105

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Menetrey J, Duthon VB, Laumonier T, Fritschy D (2008) "biological failure" of the anterior cruciate ligament graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:224–231

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Lind M (2014) Comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a nationwide population-based cohort study: results from the danish registry of knee ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:278–284

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Spindler KP, Parker RD, Andrish JT, Kaeding CC, Wright RW, Marx RG et al (2013) Prognosis and predictors of ACL reconstructions using the MOON cohort: a model for comparative effectiveness studies. J Orthop Res 31:2–9

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tecklenburg K, Burkart P, Hoser C, Rieger M, Fink C (2006) Prospective evaluation of patellar tendon graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing composite bioabsorbable and allograft interference screws. Arthroscopy 22:993–999

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;(198):43-9.

  25. 25.

    Wagner M, Kaab MJ, Schallock J, Haas NP, Weiler A (2005) Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation: a prospective matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med 33:1327–1336

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The study was supported by a research grant from smith & Nephew. Grant # 15000946.

Author information




Martin Lind, Article writing, data analysis, patient surgery and follow-up. Torsten Nielsen, data analysis, patient d follow-up. Ole Gade Sørensen, Article writing, patient surgery and follow-up. Bjarne Mygind-Klavsen, Article writing, patient surgery and follow-up. Peter Faunø. Article writing, patient surgery and follow-up. Stacy Leake-Gardner, Article writing, CT data analysis. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Lind.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the local scientific ethical committee (Region Midtjylland Ethical Committee Approval no. M-20110138) and by the Region Midtjylland Data Protection Agency and conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for publication

Ethical approval also grant right to publication in Denmark.

Competing interests

The study was supported by a research grant from smith & Nephew. Author ML has performed payed educational activities for Smith and Nephew. Stacey Leake-Gardner is employed by Smith & Nephew. The other authors has no conflicts of interest in relation to the present study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lind, M., Nielsen, T., Sørensen, O.G. et al. Bone ingrowth into open architecture PEEK interference screw after ACL reconstruction. J EXP ORTOP 7, 68 (2020).

Download citation


  • ACL reconstruction
  • Graft fixation
  • Interference screw
  • Bone ingrowth