Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Advances in modern osteotomies around the knee

Report on the Association of Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Orthopaedic surgery, Rehabilitation (ASTAOR) Moscow International Osteotomy Congress 2017
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2, 3Email author,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6, 7,
  • 6, 7,
  • 7,
  • 7,
  • 8,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 9,
  • 10,
  • 11,
  • 12,
  • 2, 13, 14 and
  • 6, 7
Contributed equally
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics20196:9

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0177-5

  • Received: 15 October 2018
  • Accepted: 13 February 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Corrective lower limb osteotomies are innovative and efficient therapeutic procedures for restoring axial alignment and managing unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. This review presents critical insights into the up-dated clinical knowledge on osteotomies for complex posttraumatic or congenital lower limb deformities with a focus on high tibial osteotomies, including a comprehensive overview of basic principles of osteotomy planning, biomechanical considerations of different implants for osteotomies and insights in specific bone deformity correction techniques. Emphasis is placed on complex cases of lower limb osteotomies associated with ligament and multiaxial instability including pediatric cases, computer-assisted navigation, external fixation for long bone deformity correction and return to sport after such osteotomies. Altogether, these advances in the experimental and clinical knowledge of complex lower limb osteotomies allow generating improved, adapted therapeutic regimens to treat congenital and acquired lower limb deformities.

Introduction

Lower limb osteotomies are an important area in orthopaedic surgery and research, motivated largely by an increasing occurrence and distribution of osteoarthritis (OA) and other clinical problems. They are indicated for unicompartmental knee OA associated with malalignment (Madry et al. 2016), and for anatomic and functional reconstructions of posttraumatic or congenital deformities (Lamm and Paley 2004; Tetsworth and Paley 1994). Despite the unmet need for novel pharmaceutical therapies to alter the course of OA, osteotomies represent one of the very few surgical approaches to diminish the progression of the disease and to promote osteochondral repair. Particularly osteotomies around the knee such as supracondylar femoral and high tibial osteotomies (HTO) are appreciated as treatment choices for younger patients with unilateral OA, allowing for long-term preservation of the knee joint that may reduce the need for total knee replacement (TKR) (Madry et al. 2017; Pape et al. 2004; Pape et al. 2005; Pape et al. 2013a; Pape et al. 2013b; Pape and Rupp 2007), as European Arthroplasty Registers show that up to 20% of all patients with TKR are not satisfied with their knee function, mainly because of residual stiffness and pain (Kahlenberg et al. 2018; Pitto et al. 2002). As the number of osteotomies is rising, scientific interest in joint-preserving procedures is growing worldwide due to significant improvements of planning, surgical technique and implants.

To promote comprehensive discussion of complex osteotomies, more than 30 world-renowned clinicians and scientists from 16 countries, among which Abkhazia, Armenia, Austria, Belarus, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kirgizstan, Luxembourg, Russia, Ukraine, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA gathered together in Moscow, Russia in 2017 Congress of the Association of Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Orthopaedic surgery, Rehabilitation (ASTAOR) to discuss the latest advances in complex osteotomies of the lower limb (Table 1). Reflecting the different presentations, this paper offers an overview of the key issues associated with complex osteotomies of the lower limb with a focus on high tibial osteotomies, ranging from basic scientific principles of the osteochondral unit and osteotomies to modern surgical indications, surgical planning, fixation devices, bone deformity correction techniques, paediatric osteotomies and complex surgeries, such as simultaneous osteotomy and ligament reconstruction. Certain issues regarding advanced analyses and planning knowledge for multilevel and multiplane deformities are, due to the nature of a congress report, outside of its scope and not discussed in detail.
Table 1

Lectures of the ASTAOR Moscow International Osteotomy Congress

Speaker

City

Country

Title of lectures

Aleksandr Artemyev

Moscow

Russia

• Twenty-year experience in correcting the leg shape and length for the aesthetic and clinical indications

• Corrective osteotomy away from deformity high point for the treatment of malunited tibial fractures

Karl-Peter Benedetto

Feldkirch

Austria

Osteotomy and Instability

Dmitriy Chugaev

St. Petersburg

Russia

Errors and complications after periarticular osteotomies

Matteo Denti

Milan

Italy

• HTO: modern indications

• Surgical technique of High tibial osteotomy: tips and tricks

• Early OA and instability

Aleksandr Frolov

Moscow

Russia

Principles for corrective osteotomies of femur and tibia in children with osteogenesis imperfecta

Alexander Korchagin

Moscow

Russia

Rehabilitation after lower limb osteotomies

Gleb Korobushkin

Moscow

Russia

Calcaneal osteotomies in foot deformities corrections

Fedor Lazko

Moscow

Russia

Proximal tibial open wedge osteotomy with tricalciumphosphate blocks for varus tibia: easy to perform?

Oleg Milenin

Moscow

Russia

Fulkerson tibial osteotomy

Adrian Wilson

London

UK

• History of osteotomy

• Complex osteotomy: intraarticular and slope change surgery

• MIS surgical technique HTO and DFO

• Small plates precision bone wedge and rapid rehabilitation

Henning Madry

Homburg

Germany

Update on the anatomy and pathology of the osteochondral unit

Pathogenesis, definition and classification of early OA

HTO and biological preservation of knee

Viktor Mukhanov

St. Petersburg

Russia

Mid-term results of high open tibial osteotomy in patients with medial compartment arthrosis

Philippe Neyret

Lyon

France

• HTO: in moderate knee arthritis

• Distal femoral osteotomies

• Knee osteotomies in sports

Weniamin Orljanski

Vienna

Austria

Preoperative planning for HTO

Dietrich Pape

Luxembourg

Luxembourg

• Plate fixation after HTO: which plate design is best?

• Return to Sports after HTO: what to expect?

• Tips and tricks for HTO: a pictorial overview

Viktor Protsko

Moscow

Russia

Distal tibial osteotomy for foot deformities correction

Evgeniy Sorokin

St. Petersburg

Russia

Chevron osteotomy of femur

Leonid Solomin

St. Petersburg

Russia

Current concepts for long bones deformities correction

Is the use of orthopaedic hexapods a mainstream for the correction of long bone deformities?

Alex E. Staubli

Lucerne

Switzerland

• Fifteen years personal experience with biplanar open wedge HTO with TomoFix plate

• Gap healing of open wedge HTO without interpositional grafting

Kevin R. Stone

San Francisco

USA

Meniscal replacement and grafting of the articular surfaces.

Viktor Vilenskiy

St. Petersburg

Russia

Treatment of lower limb deformities in children using different methods: external fixation, managed growth and intramedullar osteosynthesis

Igor Voronkevich

St. Petersburg

Russia

Intraarticular osteotomies for sequelar tibial condyle fractures

Vitaliy Zayats

St. Petersburg

Russia

Simultaneous ACL reconstruction and HTO

Abbreviations: ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; ASTAOR, Association of Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Orthopaedic surgery, Rehabilitation; distal femoral osteotomy, DFO; HTO, high tibial osteotomy; MIS, minimally invasive surgery; OA, osteoarthritis

A vision of osteotomy development

Recently, orthopaedic surgeons, particularly those specialized in knee surgeries and sports trauma, have noted a more frequent occurrence of early-stage OA and other symptomatic pathologies of the knee articular cartilage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) explaining imaging and advancements in the field of radiology, in particular with regard to information that can be gained from weightbearing radiographs of the knee (Rosenberg et al. 1988), have made improved identification of these pathologies possible and are now routinely used (Puddu 2002). MRI scans allow visualising and classifying chondral and osteochondral knee pathologies. This is one of the reasons that the indications for an HTO have changed, together with an enhanced understanding of the effects of mechanical (un)loading on the chondrocyte, favouring unloading as a key to treat knee OA associated with axial malalignment (Waller et al. 2011).

Historically HTO was performed in cases of the late varus OA knee, the effectiveness of which was evident only for a limited number of years. This, together with advancements made on knee replacements (Nagel et al. 1996; W-Dahl et al. 2010), meant that, in the past, the HTO was progressively abandoned, and this could also be the motivation for finding new indications for the HTO procedure, as studies began to look to the HTO not for the treatment of cases of advanced OA, but for the treatment at its initial stage.

In some countries, endoprosthetic knees replaced HTOs even in young subjects, and there has been the risk of gradual loss of experience with regards to patient selection and surgical routine and which, may in turn, have negatively affected outcomes (W-Dahl et al. 2010). The situation worsens in cases of an unstable knee with ligamentous lesion of one of the cruciate ligaments or after a previously performed meniscectomy. On the other hand, some HTO studies also observed a slow deterioration over time, with good survival rates up to 15 years (Amendola and Bonasia 2010; Hui et al. 2011).

Osteotomy has traditionally been considered as a standalone treatment, but limb alignment has an intrinsic relationship with both the articulating and the stabilising structures of the knee. Therefore, it should be considered for the combination not only with other osteotomies and arthroplasties but as part of the treatment strategy whenever procedures that stabilize the knee and restore cartilage are performed.

HTO and biological knee preservation

Principles of biological knee preservation

There is an increasing awareness on the importance in identifying early phases of the degenerative processes in knee OA, the period of the disease when there might still be some regenerative ability of the articular cartilage, which is permanently lost in the advanced disease stages (Madry et al. 2016). A definition of the early OA phase is important to identify and properly treat patients at risk of progression, allowing to better design trials for the assessment of potential and indications of the available and new emerging treatments, and therefore to better allocate resources and manage patients affected by lesions of the knee articular surface in the clinical practice (Angele et al. 2016a; Angele et al. 2016b; Cucchiarini et al. 2016; Madry et al. 2016; Madry et al. 2012). HTO offloads the medial compartment of the knee and has been shown to promote repair of the articular cartilage damaged by OA (Jung et al. 2014; Kanamiya et al. 2002; Madry et al. 2016; Tischer et al. 2017).

Current regenerative treatment approaches for cartilage repair aim for the restoration of a focal traumatic lesion. For regenerative treatment of the knee, alignment seems also to be the most essential part, although such cases are much rarer compared to OA. Therefore, in combination with focal cartilage defect and meniscus treatments, correction of (severe) deformities is often recommended, even of smaller deformities (> 3 to 5°). A recent study showed that untreated malalignment was in 56%, graft failure in 27%, untreated meniscal deficiency in 19% and untreated instability in 5% of cases with failed index surgical procedures (Krych et al. 2018).

Biological basis of HTO for varus deformities

In a normally aligned knee, the center of pressure passes slightly to the medial side during stance. During flexion, the center of pressure is even more medial. Axial varus malalignment leads to an abnormal load distribution across the medial compartment, pathologically affecting both tibiofemoral osteochondral units and the medial meniscus. A 4% to 6% increase in varus malalignment significantly increases loading (up to 20%) in the medial compartment, affecting the articular cartilage, the subchondral bone and the medial meniscus. HTO aims to cut through this vicious cycle of malalignment, which leads to progressive cartilage degeneration and progressive worsening of the malalignment based on the unicompartimental overload. Previous studies evaluating the effect of HTO on an intact lateral compartment in a sheep model answered the question whether the increased loads would lead to degeneration of the lateral meniscus and osteochondral unit (Ziegler et al. 2015). The lateral meniscus is potentially problematic as a prospective multicenter study has shown that patients with lateral partial meniscectomies are prone to develop rapid progressive OA within a short time (Servien et al. 2009). In a newly developed sheep osteotomy model (Pape and Madry 2013), the effects of standard and valgus overcorrection were evaluated. The increase of pressure in the lateral compartment following valgus standard correction does not lead to significant structural changes in the lateral tibiofemoral osteochondral compartment, especially no cartilage degeneration (Ziegler et al. 2015). A higher increase in load as a result of overcorrection induces a few adaptive changes in the intact lateral compartment, reflected in an increased specific bone surface in the proximal tibial subarticular spongiosa (Ziegler et al. 2015). Such valgus overcorrection also decreases the cell number in the red-red (peripheral) zone of the middle third of the lateral menisci, without changing the meniscal structure (Madry et al. 2013). These translational data are supported by several clinical studies. In the study from Bick et al., mean values of numerical meniscal parameters measured preoperatively and postoperatively by MRI (e.g. relative meniscal thickness and width) showed no significant morphological changes in either the anterior horn, pars intermedia, or posterior horn. However, when an evaluation of meniscal degeneration according to the Stoller classification with MRI images was performed, significant degeneration in every part of the meniscus [significant at the anterior horn (p < 0.01), pars intermedia (p = 0.021), and posterior horn (p < 0.01) was seen] (Bick et al. 2018). Moreover, at a mean of 2 years after medial open-wedge HTO, semiquantitative evidence of macroscopic repair of degenerated articular cartilage in the medial compartment was reported after correcting varus deformities without any additional cartilage repair procedures, especially for patients with lower body mass index (BMI) (Kim et al. 2017).

Modern indications for HTO

Osteotomy of the proximal tibia aims to unload the medial compartment in cases of medial tibiofemoral OA without additional surgical treatments. Degenerative changes of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone may occur through high compression or shear, and are the result of forces exerted on the bearing surfaces (Denti et al. 2013). More recently, HTO is being performed in the context of cartilage injuries, in addition to reconstructive cartilage treatments such as ACI.

The arthroscopic indication for an HTO based on medial tibiofemoral OA is when a grade 2 or 3 chondral lesion, according to the Outerbridge (Outerbridge 1961) or International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) classification (Hoemann et al. 2011), is present at the medial compartment associated with a varus knee and with an intact lateral compartment (Denti et al. 2013). The most frequent indication is seen in the young and active patient; he or she has medial pain on weightbearing, mild to moderate medial OA and deformity without bone erosion; the joint is stable and has no significant limitation of movement, and there is no patellar malposition. In this situation, a medial open-wedge osteotomy can be performed in isolation, aiming for slight overcorrection to between 0° and 6° mechanical valgus depending on the severity of initial OA changes. In recent literature, an individualized degree of correction is propagated rather than a uniform correction to the Fujisawa-Region (62–68% of the lateral tibial width) (Fujisawa et al. 1979). Fine tuning of the correction is possible intra-operatively, possibly aiming for less correction in young and active patients than older patients. The complication rate is low, although fractures through the tibial plateau and lateral cortex disruption with instability and loss of correction can occur. The procedure is often palliative, in the sense that a bone deformity will be created to compensate for intra-articular wear only, rather than correcting a pre-existing bone deformity. However, this deformity may be mild, especially when there is constitutional varus.

A guideline from the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) identified the ideal candidate for HTO as a patient with isolated medial joint line pain, aged 40 to 60 years old, BMI < 30, high-demand activity except running or jumping, malalignment < 15°, metaphyseal varus, full range of movement, and normal lateral and patellofemoral compartments (Rand and Neyret 2005). The severity of medial compartment OA is a relevant predictor of outcome after HTO, and accumulative evidences show that a low degree of OA is linked to better outcomes. Also, it is clear that tricompartimental OA is a contraindication to osteotomy (Rinonapoli et al. 1988). Correction to a femorotibial angle between 6° and 14° of valgus is associated with an optimal clinical result (Flecher et al. 2006). Undercorrection (to less than 5° of femorotibial valgus) is associated with a high (62.5%) failure rate (Rudan and Simurda 1990).

In the past, the presence of patella baja was taken as a contraindication. According to Lobenhoffer et al., the biplanar osteotomy with an V-shaped ascending frontal cut can decrease patella height by 2 mm per 10° of valgus correction (Lobenhoffer and Agneskirchner 2003). In a preexisting patella baja, the uniplanar closed wedge technique can increase patella height whereas the biplanar distal frontal technique leaves patella height unchanged. In a preexisting patella alta, either the biplanar proximal frontal open wedge technique or the obsolete uniplanar open wedge technique reduces patella alta (El-Azab et al. 2010; Hinterwimmer et al. 2011; LaPrade et al. 2010; Song et al. 2010).

An accurate technique is mandatory to obtain excellent results (Hankemeier et al. 2010; Puddu 2002; Puddu et al. 2007). The type of valgus tibial osteotomy generally indicated is an open-wedge osteotomy, in order to guarantee better and more sustainable results, this has been compared to a close-wedge osteotomy (Coventry 1965; Franco et al. 2005; Georgoulis et al. 1999; Gomoll 2011; Hernigou et al. 1987; Jackson and Waugh 1961; Puddu 2002; Puddu et al. 2007).

HTO is more recently also performed in the context of cartilage injuries in addition to reconstructive cartilage treatments (Brinkman et al. 2008)., since analyses of failed cases revealed untreated malalignment as the most commonly recognized reason (in 56% cases) for failed index surgical procedures such as microfractures or osteochondral transplantations (Krych et al. 2018). In cases of patients with focal cartilage lesions of the medial femoral condyle with accompanying varus deformities of > 5°, there is general consensus to treating such deformities either in a one- or two-staged scenario (Niemeyer et al. 2016). Data from a non-randomized controlled clinical trial on ACI in cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle without or with HTO for patients with varus deformity of less than 5° showed that HTO also leads to a reduced rate of reinterventions and longer survival rates (Bode et al. 2013).

Basic principles of osteotomy planning

Multiple factors need to be considered when contemplating an HTO in each patient. Relevant issues include the age, gender and weight of the patient, their activity and expectation, and whether the patient is a smoker. The effect of excessive weight is controversial but may affect the outcome due to loss of correction, and difficulties with rehabilitation. Results of HTO tend to be better in male patients and those under 50 years, whereas the converse is true after total knee arthroplasty (Aglietti et al. 2003; Bonasia et al. 2014; Hantes et al. 2018; Keenan et al. 2018; Naudie et al. 1999; Odenbring et al. 1989). The focus should also be on location and extent of the articular wear, the origin of the deformity and joint line inclination, joint stability and motion, and leg length discrepancy.

Patient selection

The selection of patients suitable for the HTO procedure can only be done after a thorough pre-operative evaluation. A thorough physical exam with clinical assessment of ligamentous insufficiency is prudent. The standard evaluation and deformity analysis begins with the assessment of the alignment of the lower limbs with, full leg weight bearing X-rays whose importance can not be overstated and bilateral weightbearing anteroposterior views in full extension, bilateral weightbearing posteroanterior views at 45° of flexion as described by Rosenberg (Rosenberg et al. 1988), and lateral and skyline films of both knees. The Rosenberg view has a strong predictive value when the deformity is associated with cruciate insufficiency, resulting in anterior tibial subluxation, and chondral wear prevailing in the posterior area of the medial tibial plateau. The osteotomy may be planned according to the method described by Dugdale and associates (Dugdale et al. 1992). MRI can be very useful in identifying suitable candidates for knee osteotomy, as it can show not only cartilage damage but also the stress reaction of the subchondral bone.

Before the HTO procedure, a diagnostic arthroscopy is recommended to be performed routinely in the same operative session, either for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, allowing for determining the cartilage status to modify type/degree of correction osteotomy accordingly (Brinkman et al. 2008). Therapeutic arthroscopic procedures are also indicated in cases of intraarticular pathologies. A prospective study from Müller et al., including 340 cases of knee osteotomy, highlighted that arthroscopy prior to osteotomy around the knee as an indispensable tool with both diagnostic and therapeutic properties (Müller and Strecker 2008).

Timing of the osteotomy

Timing is a very important factor in this reparative surgery because an osteotomy is much more effective if it is performed in the earliest stage of unicompartimental OA, in order to prevent progression of degenerative changes in the joint of a still young and active patient (Amendola and Bonasia 2010; Gomoll 2011; Trieb et al. 2006; Wolcott et al. 2010). Osteotomy is best done in cases of knees with a generally well-maintained range of motion. An osteotomy is not indicated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, patients or in knees with greater than 20° of varus deformity. The HTO imaging indication is when the radiographs demonstrate changes such as moderate osteophytes and joint space narrowing, subchondral bone sclerosis and cysts, possible deformity of the bone contour, Kellgren-Lawrence grades II-III (Kellgren and Lawrence 1957; Luyten et al. 2012).

Degree of articular cartilage loss

If the loss of cartilage is located postero-medial on the tibial plateau in association with an anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, a lateral closed-wedge osteotomy is logical due to the natural tendency of the procedure to decrease the tibial slope (Noyes et al. 2000). The healing time is shorter than with open-wedge osteotomy, but achieving an accurate coronal correction may be technically more challenging. Also, damage to the common peroneal nerve is possible. Controlling slope during a medial open-wedge osteotomy is more difficult, but directing the cut to the proximal tibiofibular joint will allow more freedom in adjusting the proximal fragment in the sagittal plane.

Axial imbalance

The associated sagittal imbalance may also be treated with a biplanar osteotomy, for instance with an extension element to reduce the effects of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency, although it is important to consider the effect on the postoperative range of motion (Giffin et al. 2007). Regarding anterior instability, the isolated HTO, also known as isolated slope-reducing extension osteotomy, for the treatment of pure ACL instability is currently not an established therapeutic option with scarce available evidences (Feucht et al. 2013; Robin and Neyret 2016). However, chronic ACL or PCL instability in the presence varus osteoarthritis can be sufficiently treated with slope-decreasing (ACL insufficiency) or slope-increasing (PCL insufficiency) valgus-producing tibial osteotomies (Loia et al. 2016).

Leg length discrepancy

Although the clinical effects of leg length discrepancy are controversial, there are significant length changes in different types of tibial osteotomy. These are rarely a problem on their own, but adding to an existing discrepancy may result in clinical significance. With a large medial open-wedge correction, the length increase may exceed 1 cm, and so a careful preoperative assessment with long X-rays and discussion with the patient are wise. Closed-wedge HTO produces a little reduction in leg length, which is less likely to be significant to the patient (Magnussen et al. 2011).

Patella position

Patella position needs to be assessed preoperatively to exclude patellar infera (“patella baja”), as patellar height may be decreased in open-wedge osteotomy compared with closed-wedge methods. Apart from undercorrection with continued pain, and overcorrection with subsequent lateral compartment wear, patellar femoral pain is one reason for failure of the procedure, and this may be more likely with patella infera (Brouwer et al. 2005).

Biomechanical properties of different plates for open-wedge HTO

A variety of different tibial osteotomy plates are currently available to perform open-wedge HTO for medial femorotibial OA in the varus knee (Lobenhoffer and Agneskirchner 2003; Pape et al. 2013b) (Fig. 1). In larger correction (< 8°), an opposite cortex fracture is frequent and inevitable, which may lead to loss of valgus correction before bony fusion is achieved and may even necessitate reoperation. In these cases, maintenance of correction depends solely on the primary implant stability prior to complete healing, therefore, sufficient primary stability until solid bone healing is crucial (Gardner et al. 2010).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The fixation devices currently available for high tibial osteotomy, including the Contour Lock plate, TomoFix sm plate, TomoFix standard plate, PEEKPower standard plate, iBalance implant, and Activemotion plate (adapted from (Kaze et al. 2015))

Pape et al., undertook a biomechanical study to compare static and fatigue strength of different plates. Twenty-six fourth-generation tibial bone composites underwent a medial open-wedge HTO according to standardized techniques, using several available implants (Maas et al. 2013). Static compression load to failure tests (Kaze et al. 2015; Maas et al. 2013) revealed that all plates showed sufficient stability (up to 2400 N) without any signs of opposite cortex fracture according to the TAKEUCHI classification (Takeuchi et al. 2012), which occurred above this load in all constructs at different load levels (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The TAKEUCHI classification of fractures around cortical hinge and corresponding stability of the subtypes (adapted from (Takeuchi et al. 2012))

During the fatigue failure tests, screw breakage in the iBalance group and opposite cortex fractures in all constructs occurred at lower loading conditions. The highest fatigue strength in terms of maximal load and number of cycles performed prior to failure was observed for the Contour Lock group followed by the iBalance implants, the TomoFix standard and small stature plates. The PEEKPower group showed the lowest fatigue strength. All plates showed sufficient stability under static loading. Compared to the TomoFix and the PEEK-Power plates, the Contour Lock plate and iBalance implant showed higher mechanical fatigue strength during cyclic fatigue testing. These data suggest that both mechanical static and fatigue strength increase with a wider proximal T-shaped plate design together with diverging proximal screws as used in the Contour Lock plate or a closed-wedge construction in the iBalance design. Mechanical strength of the bone-implant constructs decreases with a narrow T-shaped proximal end design and converging proximal screws (TomoFix) or a short vertical plate design (PEEKPower Plate). Although testing of the TomoFix plate shows not the best biomechanical results, the literature states high fusion rates and good clinical results even in corrections with wedge sizes exceeding 12 mm. A certain amount of interfragmentary motion rather than high mechanical strength and stiffness seem to be important for bone healing (Perren 2010; Staubli and Jacob 2010) and has to be studied further.

Mukhanov et al., reported the mid-term results of high open tibial osteotomy with iBalance implant, CounterLock and Puddu plate in patients with medial compartment OA. A total of 114 knees (108 patients) treated by HTO with different devices (iBalance implant, 8 knees; CounterLock, 81 knees; Puddu plate, 25 knees). Ninety-one patients (84.3%) were satisfied with the decreased pain intensity. There was no significant difference in the functional results among the three groups of patients operated with different implants. The data also confirmed that medial compartment knee OA with varus deformity, cartilage lesions with ICRS score 2–3, visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity < 5 are an appropriate indication for HTO.

Bone deformity correction techniques

Prevention of lateral cortex fracture in open-wedge HTO

During the opening of a medial-based HTO, the opposite (lateral) cortex serves as an elastic hinge. In larger corrections, the capacity for elastic deformation is frequently exceeded resulting in a plastic deformation and fracture of the opposite cortex, which may lead to subsequent loss of correction (Kessler et al. 2002; Pape et al. 2004). An anteroposterior (AP) drill hole at the apex of the horizontal osteotomy (=hinge) is supposed to increase the capacity of the bony hinge for elastic deformation (Kessler et al. 2002; Schroter et al. 2014). A study investigated the possibility of the hinge drill to preserve the opposite cortex during an open-wedge HTO, comparing outcomes between HTO without or with an additional AP hinge drilling both in a Sawbone model or in human cadaveric tibial bones. Regardless of the study group, all tibial bones with an additional hinge drilling achieved larger correction angles during the spreading of the wedge until a fracture of the opposite cortex occurred. The average correction angle of all specimens without the drill hole was 2.7° and increased to 4.8° with the hinge drill (77.8% increase). The effect was pronounced in the Sawbone models (2.4° increase of correction; + 109%), while the lowest in the human tibiae (2.9° to 4.2° increase; + 45%).

The supposedly cortex-preserving effect of an anteroposterior drilling at the apex of the horizontal osteotomy of an HTO (“hinge”) increased the capacity for spreading the medial-based wedge by 2.1° with a maximum correction angle of 4.8°. In correction angles exceeding 5°, all specimens showed a hinge fracture regardless of the presence or absence of a hinge drill. These data show that the hinge protecting effect is restricted to small correction angles used i.e. to unload cartilage repair regions following microfracture, osteochondral autograft transplant and autologous chondrocyte implantation in the absence of severe malalignment. For the treatment of varus knee OA with a significant malalignment, the fracture-protecting effect of a hinge drill is absent in this study since the required angles to correct the malalignment exceed 8 ° regularly.

Distal femoral osteotomy

Even though valgus knee deformities often have a femoral origin, distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is an uncommonly performed procedure. There is no true algorithm to direct its use, although there are some important factors that help in decision making. DFO changes the frontal plane alignment in extension only, and any valgus deformity beyond 30° of flexion will persist. Thus in a case where there is clinical valgus and joint space narrowing in extension it will be effective, but if the joint space narrowing is only seen on the Rosenberg/weightbearing flexion view (i.e there is valgus only in flexion), it may not. In this situation, other procedures may be more appropriate. To differentiate between the origin of malalignment, separate tibial and femoral joint angles have to be measured with the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA, standard value 87° ± 3°) and the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA, standard value 87° ± 3°). If the mLDFA value is below standard, the origin of valgus deformity is the femur and a femoral osteotomy is indicated. If the mMPTA is above standard, the tibia is the origin of malalignment. If, upon reversion, the femoral angle is above standard, the femur is the origin of a varus deformity and need to be addressed accordingly.

Measuring joint line angles according to If there is valgus of mixed origin, a varus close-wedge HTO may be utilized, but can introduce joint line obliquity in this situation. Alternative options for older patients are lateral unicompartmental knee replacement or total knee arthroplasty. The ideal patient for DFO is thus a younger active patient with a valgus deformity in or near extension, with isolated lateral compartment changes or with patellar femoral symptoms. Failure of non-operative treatment, and motivation to undergo the long rehabilitation period are prerequisites.

Most published studies of DFO have concerned medial close-wedge techniques, with fewer reports of lateral opening techniques. Although the series is limited in terms of patient number and follow up, the satisfaction rates appear good, but the complication rates variable. Delayed union and non-union is an issue in both opening and closing wedge techniques, but appears to be related to surgical technique and fixation method, with higher non-union or loss of fixation rates with open-wedge osteotomy using locked plates. A study from the Centre Albert Trillat reported on 29 patients undergoing lateral open-wedge osteotomy and autologous bone grafting using an internal plate fixator, with average 80 months follow up. Eighty-six percent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied, and angular correction was good. There were 5 revisions to arthroplasty at a mean of 166 months. Most of the patients required removal of the plate due to lateral soft tissue irritation, and these were carried out at a mean of 26 months (Niemeyer et al. 2010).

The success of the technique relies on correct preoperative planning, and careful intraoperative technique. The correction is measured in a routine fashion, but including the intra-articular deformity that is due to chondral wear. If the deformity is in the metaphysis, introducing the blade parallel to the joint line will result in automatic correction as the plate is applied to the shaft proximal to the deformity. However, if the deformity is more proximally in the shaft, the blade is introduced at the appropriate angle to the joint line. The osteotomy is made after marking the bone to control rotation and preparing the blade slot. A coronal plane osteotomy anteriorly helps control the rotation and stabilize the construct intraoperatively and increases the surface area for healing. The medial cortex is weakened with multiple drill holes to allow a controlled hinged opening. This is done with osteotomies, and with the slow application of the plate to the proximal fragment as the proximal screws are inserted. Iliac crest autograft is used routinely, and the post-operative rehabilitation involves eight weeks non-weightbearing, but adapted to the clinical situation.

Lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy is easier to perform, and allows more accurate angular correction, than medial closing wedge osteotomy. With careful surgical technique, adjusted to account for the origin of the deformity and aiming to correct to 0–3° varus, good functional results are achievable. Delayed union is not common, but bone grafting and protected weightbearing are required, and removal of metal must be considered routine.

Lower limb osteotomies in children

Limb reconstruction surgery is an emerging subspecialty and corrective osteotomies are commonly applied for a wide range of indications of bone-related congenital and acquired disease (Dabis et al. 2017). Alignment correction can restore normal anatomy, physiological biomechanics, and optimal joint congruency to prevent medium and long-term degenerative deterioration of the joint.

Limb lengthening

Current methods of limb lengthening in children are based on gradual distraction osteogenesis with various modalities (Skomoroshko et al. 2014). Vilensky et al., reported the outcomes of children long bone deformities treated with different methods (guided growth, external fixation and internal fixation). Three groups of patients were analysed: 100 children receiving osteotomies and gradual correction of deformities and lengthening by computer-assisted six axes Ortho-SUV Frame (group A),62 children receiving guided growth (group B), and 40 children receiving corrective osteotomies with internal fixation by intramedullary locking nails (group C). In group A, the accuracy of deformity correction ranged from 92% (in sagittal plane) to 96% (in frontal plane). The period of deformity correction varied from 9.18 ± 2.76 days (for simple deformities) till 24 ± 14.72 (for complex deformities). External fixation index varied from 31.2 ± 15.1 to 35.32 ± 12.61 days/cm. Complications occurred including pin-tract infection (15%), joint stiffness (17%), breakage of transosseous elements, non-union or atrophic regenerate formation (3%), and secondary fractures and deformities (4%). In group B, the accuracy of deformity correction varied from 85% (in sagittal plane) to 90% (in frontal plane). Migration of plates and screws were observed in 4 cases requiring removal and re-implantation. The guided growth was ineffective in 5 cases of Ollier disease. In group C, the accuracy of deformity correction varied from 85% (in the sagittal plane) to 90% (in the frontal plane). Peroneal neuropathy and recurrence of the deformity were observed in 1 case, respectively. The data showed that all the analyzed methods of long bone deformities treatment can be effective in children. Age, condition of growth plates, absence or presence of shortening should be taken into consideration for the treatment planning.

Corrective osteotomies for osteogenesis imperfecta

Osteogenesis imperfecta is a connective tissue disorder characterized by low bone mass, bone fragility and long bones deformities (Marini et al. 2017). In this disease fractures of lower extremities long bones most often occur on the apex of deformities. Realignment by performing multiple closing wedge osteotomies and intramedullary nailing is a widely accepted treatment which improves patients’ mobility. Frolov and Burtsev et al., shared their experience in treatment of femur fractures and deformities with elastic titanium nails in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Twenty-six patients (mean age 7 ± 2.5 years) with osteogenesis imperfecta underwent closing wedge osteotomies of femur on 1 or up to 3 levels and intramedullary fixation with titanium elastic nails with a postoperative immobilization from 3 to 6 weeks. At 6–8 weeks postoperatively, fracture consolidation was achieved in 77% of cases. Titanium nail migration took place in 21% cases. At 8–12 weeks postoperatively 19 patients (74%) returned to their previous level of mobility, 7 patients (26%), who were using wheelchair preoperatively, started to stand and walk with additional support. Thus, multiple closing wedge osteotomies of femur and intramedullary titanium elastic nails fixation may save or improve the level of mobility and decrease fracture incidence in children with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Modern osteotomies

HTO combined with cartilage repair, meniscal transplantation, and ligament reconstruction

The “modern” HTO is indicated in younger patients presenting initial medial OA of the knee and even in cases where it is associated with other surgical procedures; it not only reduces painful symptoms, but can ensure the sports activity at a recreational level (Bonnin et al. 2013; LaPrade et al. 2012; Salzmann et al. 2009; Wolcott et al. 2010). Over the last 10 years the majority of osteotomies have been performed in combined with cartilage repair, meniscal transplantation, and ligament reconstruction. For HTO associated with cartilage treatments, it has been observed that with cartilage pathologies, after a non-weightbearing period, the rate of change in the medial compartment shifts from negative to positive, indicating the potential for articular cartilage recovery secondary to an improved mechanical environment. For example, improved outcomes were observed when the HTO was accompanied with microfracture or other procedures such as autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) (Bode et al. 2015; Bode et al. 2013; Gao et al. 2018; Parker et al. 2011; Sterett et al. 2010; Trinh et al. 2013; Waller et al. 2011). Single-stage ACI and concomitant HTO are reliable, safe and have satisfying clinical and improved functional outcomes after 5 years (Bode et al. 2015). In the future, it will be important to compare the single-staged procedure with the two-staged HTO followed by ACI. For HTO accompanied with meniscal transplantation, the combined surgery has been reported to generate greater improvement at the final follow-up compared to isolated medial meniscal transplantation (Verdonk et al. 2006). For patients with a torn ACL, the association of HTO with ligament reconstruction is open to debate and necessitates more investigation (Denti et al. 2013).

HTO combined with ACL reconstruction

The incidence of ACL lesions continues to increase, which is about 87 per 100,000 population per year (Nordenvall et al. 2012), with 90.1% of patients undergoing the ACL reconstruction performed arthroscopically (Paterno et al. 2014). In 56.0% of patients, surgical treatment is performed later than 6 months after injury (Razi et al. 2013), and 66.0% of the reconstruction is performed in the degenerative knee (Magnussen et al. 2013). Patients with an ACL injury present gradually complex ligamentous laxity of the knee joint with a varus malalignment and OA, which is worsened by a lateral thrust during gait. This varus thrust is a lateral joint line opening at foot strike and the patient needs to shift their weight in order to reduce the knee back into normal positioning. Three-dimensional gait analysis of patients (n = 33) with concomitant medial opening wedge HTO and ACL reconstruction identified a substantial decreased knee adduction in the operated limb and a slight increase in the non-operated limb within 5 years postoperatively (Marriott et al. 2015). A decrease in the knee flexion moment was also noticed at both limbs. These data suggest that such concomitant surgery yielded substantial improved ligamentous stabilization, which were maintained up to 5 years postoperatively. Therefore, similar complex pathological scenarios may necessitate such or other combined treatments. Moreover, a recent study from Keenan et al., indicated that specific factors such as older age (> 46 years), female sex, high number of comorbidities and prior meniscectomy lowered the 10-year survivorship of HTO to total knee arthroplasty, indicating that these risk factors need to be considered pre-operatively when planning intervention for isolated medial compartment OA (Keenan et al. 2018).

For patients with a failed ACL reconstruction, HTO provides a more complete solution with the inclination of the slope of the tibial plate (Won et al. 2013). In cases of anterior instability, the plate should be positioned posterior to the medial collateral ligament and allows a higher opening posteriorly than anteriorly. The combination of a valgus osteotomy with ACL reconstruction, even in cases of revision, can lead to correct axis positioning and a stable knee. This combined surgery is indicated only in young select patients, those with instability associated with initial varus OA. The results of HTO associated with ACL reconstruction are encouraging (Bonin et al. 2004; Kim et al. 2011).

HTO with complex instability

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears are less frequent than ACL tears, which occur rarely as an isolated injury and more commonly with multidirectional instability (Musahl et al. 2015). Isolated posterior instability can be treated to increase the tibial slope by positioning the plate anteriorly. In posterior-posterolateral instability, the angle of the slope must be increased and also a valgus osteotomy must be performed with a lateral translation of the mechanical axis to 55–60% of the tibial plateau (Denti et al. 2013). If necessary, posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be considered at a second stage eventually in association with a posterolateral reconstruction. Gwinner et al. shows that stability after PCL reconstruction decreases over time in patients with less slope compared to patients with a normal or larger slope angle (Gwinner et al. 2017). In cases of associated anterior and posterior instability in a varus knee, HTO can be performed to correct the tibial slope for the posterior instability associated with an ACL reconstruction. It has recently been demonstrated that a moderate change of the tibial slope does not significantly modify the anterior stability (Savarese et al. 2011; Shelburne et al. 2011; Voos et al. 2012).

Computer-assisted navigation for osteotomies around the knee

Mechanical axis deviation of the lower extremity with knee pain and progression of clinical and radiological signs of OA of mainly single knee compartment is the indication for either distal femur or proximal tibia osteotomy. The emerging field of computer-assisted navigation aims to improve the accuracy and precision of correction angles during periarticular osteotomies of the knee by enhancing recision of preoperative planning and better control of intraoperative realignment compared with conventional knee osteotomies. The effectiveness of passive computer navigation system for osteotomies of femur and tibia in patients with posttraumatic medial knee arthritis was recently highlighted (Kornilov et al. 2015). Nine patients (mean age, 38 ± 5.6 years) with posttraumatic medial varus knee OA were operated (6 revisions). Osteotomy with a computer navigation system and plate fixation was performed at the proximal tibia and distal femur. Complications included change of the joint line and patella position, overcorrection of axis, and wrong position of tibial joint line slope. Successful bony union was observed within 1 year follow-up. The data show that guided osteotomy of femur and tibia with the computer navigation allows surgeons to precisely restore mechanical axis of lower extremity, avoid the change of knee joint line and save the right position of posterior tibial slope.

External fixation for long bone deformity correction

Nowadays there are different hexapod frames available for the long-bone deformity correction with reported efficiency for long bone deformity correction. Ortho-SUV Frame (OSF; Ortho-SUV Ltd., Saint-Petersburg, Russia), a novel universal unit, is composed of different types of rings without strict places for struts fixation. Solomin et al., analysed the outcome of 8 cases of multilevel deformity correction using the “Spring Technique”, 5 cases of lengthening and rotation correction over the nail, 25 cases of knee joint stiffness, 13 midfoot, 11 hindfoot, and 19 complex foot deformities correction (Solomin et al. 2017). The results in the Spring Technique group were evaluated for the period of deformity correction and time in frame. In the lengthening and rotation correction group, the value of lengthening and time in frame were recorded. In the foot deformity correction group, the accuracy of deformity correction, time in frame, number and character of complications were analysed.

All cases treated with the Spring Technique obtained excellent accuracy of alignment. The following complications were reported including one case of equines deformity in ankle (treated with Achilles tendon tenonectomy and foot support) and one case of premature consolidation at one osteotomy level (treated with re-osteotomy). The average lengthening achieved in the lengthening and rotation correction group was 40.2 ± 16 mm and the time in frame was 60.7 ± 24.5 days without complications reported. In the knee joint stiffness group, the average knee joint flexion and extension after frame removal achieved were 95° and 0°, respectively. The reported complications included a pin-hole femur fracture, posterior subluxation of the lower leg, skin necrosis, instability of the frame, and deep infection (n = 1 each), which were treated with secondary surgeries with good final outcomes. Normal range of motion was achieved in all cases except one due to patient’s request for an early fixator removal. In the foot deformity correction group, the achieved accuracy of deformity correction was 87% for ankle, 91% for midfoot, 90% for hindfoot, and 89% for complex foot deformities. Complications reported were wire breakage (n = 1), skin necrosis (n = 3), pin-tract infection (n = 2), and preliminary consolidations (n = 3). The study shows that the Ortho-SUV Frame is an effective tool for deformity correction including flexion and extension knee stiffness, foot deformities, multilevel deformities of the long bones, and lengthening and rotation correction.

Return to sport after osteotomy

Evidence for the extent of sporting activities possible after valgus HTO is increasing with time; multiple studies show a significant increase in average Lysholm scores, not just in a small number of top performing patients (Robin and Neyret 2016). Those who do not return to sport may have a fear of continuing pain or progression of OA. The result of further sport on the progression of OA after HTO is not known. In the non-operated knee, recreational sport is a favourable factor and high-level sport is negative, in which it may be that HTO does not change this pattern, but in a combined alignment and stabilisation procedure, at least meniscal and chondral preservation is more likely.

The success of the surgery on return to sport depends on several variables. A recent systematic review, reporting return to sport following high tibial osteotomy in 1189 patients, indicated that approximately two-thirds (65.5%) of patients return to an equal or greater level of physical work. However, only half of competitive athletes (57%) returned to highly professional and competitive level (Ekhtiari et al. 2016). Patient motivation is central. Not surprisingly, a higher preoperative activity level is a positive predictor, usually associated with younger patients. However, the procedure is very effective in older motivated patients without instability or severe degenerative change. Whilst instability is a negative predictor for sport after isolated HTO, combined HTO and ACL reconstruction can allow it in a high percentage of cases (Pape et al. 2005). The counter to the expanding indications may be athletes’ high expectations, where they consider the goal of a normal lifestyle to include competitive sport. This must be discussed in advance of any procedure. Good rehabilitation is probably another positive factor for return to sport, although information in the literature is lacking (Lattermann and Jakob 1996). Early weightbearing using locked plates is beneficial.

In terms of the surgery, the aim of coronal correction may be different to that intended for longevity alone (Pape et al. 2013a). Whilst a variable amount of hypercorrection has been shown to be a favourable factor for HTO survival in degenerative disease, undercorrection favours return to sports, especially for those based on running. The desired correction, therefore, needs to be fine-tuned to each patient, based on their age and sporting ambitions, amongst other factors. Open-wedge correction and the use of a locked plate may be the best option, although the sagittal slope achieved will have to be borne in mind in combined injuries.

As indications broaden, patient selection will become more important (Pape and Rupp 2007). Well considered treatment algorithms in institutions that are able to continue long-term surveillance will be essential to further define the place of HTO in patients with different patterns of pathology who wish to return to sport.

Conclusion

Corrective osteotomies around the knee are innovative and efficient therapeutic procedures for restoring axial alignment chiefly for the management of unicompartmental knee OA. This conference report presents critical insights into the up-dated clinical knowledge on osteotomies for complex posttraumatic or congenital lower limb deformities including pediatric cases, computer-assisted navigation, external fixation for long bone deformity correction and postoperative return to sport. Altogether, these advances in the experimental and clinical knowledge of complex lower limb osteotomies allow generating improved, adapted therapeutic regimens to treat congenital and acquired lower limb deformities.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Anna Vetrova and Sonja Ramin for excellent technical assistance.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to the writing of the first draft of the manuscript and critical evaluation of the content of the final version. LG, HM, NM, DP, AK: writing of the manuscript. LG, HM: data analysis and interpretation of data, critical evaluation of the content of the final version, final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center of Experimental Orthopaedics, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
(2)
Cartilage Net of the Greater Region, Homburg/Saar, Germany
(3)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
(4)
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
(5)
Department of Knee Surgery and Sports Traumatology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
(6)
People’s Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia
(7)
European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO), Moscow, Russia
(8)
Healthpoint, Abu Dhabi Knee & Sports Medicine Center, Zayed Sports City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
(9)
Private Clinic Sonnmatt Luzern, Lucerne, Switzerland
(10)
The Stone Clinic, San Francisco, California, USA
(11)
Department of Bone Pathology, The Turner Scientific and Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics, St. Petersburg, Russia
(12)
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
(13)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
(14)
Sports Medicine Research Laboratory, Public Research Centre for Health, Luxembourg, Centre Médical de La Fondation Norbert Metz, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Vena LM, Baldini A, Mondaini A (2003) High tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis: a 10- to 21-year study. J Knee Surg 16:21–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amendola A, Bonasia DE (2010) Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 34:155–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Angele P, Madry H, Kon E (2016a) Early OA: point of no return or a chance for regenerative approaches. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1741–1742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Angele P et al (2016b) Chondral and osteochondral operative treatment in early osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1743–1752.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bick F, Iffland Y, Zimmermann E, Welsch F, Hoffmann R, Stein T (2018) The medial open-wegde osteotomy generates progressive intrameniscal integrity changes in the lateral knee compartment: a prospective MR-assessment after valgic osteotomy in the varus gonarthritic knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5073-5.
  6. Bode G, Ogon P, Pestka J, Zwingmann J, Feucht M, Sudkamp N, Niemeyer P (2015) Clinical outcome and return to work following single-stage combined autologous chondrocyte implantation and high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 39:689–696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bode G, Schmal H, Pestka JM, Ogon P, Sudkamp NP, Niemeyer P (2013) A non-randomized controlled clinical trial on autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle with or without high tibial osteotomy in patients with varus deformity of less than 5 degrees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:43–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonasia DE et al (2014) Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment overload/arthritis in the varus knee: prognostic factors. Am J Sports Med 42:690–698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonin N, Selmi TAS, Donell S, Dejour H, Neyret P (2004) Anterior cruciate reconstruction combined with valgus upper tibial osteotomy: 12 years follow-up. Knee 11:431–437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonnin MP, Laurent J-R, Zadegan F, Badet R, Archbold HP, Servien E (2013) Can patients really participate in sport after high tibial osteotomy? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:64–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brinkman JM, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD, Staubli AE, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2008) Osteotomies around the knee: patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1548–1557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brouwer R, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Van Koeveringe A, Verhaar J (2005) Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomy: the open versus the closed-wedge technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1227–1232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Coventry MB (1965) Osteotomy of the upper portion of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 47:984–990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cucchiarini M, de Girolamo L, Filardo G, Oliveira JM, Orth P, Pape D, Reboul P (2016) Basic science of osteoarthritis. J Exp Orthop 3:22.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dabis J, Templeton-Ward O, Lacey AE, Narayan B, Trompeter A (2017) The history, evolution and basic science of osteotomy techniques. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 12:169–180.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Denti M, Volpi P, Puddu G (2013) Modern indications for high tibial osteotomy. In: European instructional lectures (springer), pp 253–258.Google Scholar
  17. Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D (1992) Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:248–264.Google Scholar
  18. Ekhtiari S, Haldane CE, de Sa D, Simunovic N, Musahl V, Ayeni OR (2016) Return to work and sport following high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1568–1577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. El-Azab H, Glabgly P, Paul J, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2010) Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open-and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a radiological study on 100 patients. Am J Sports Med 38:323–329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Feucht MJ, Mauro CS, Brucker PU, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2013) The role of the tibial slope in sustaining and treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:134–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN (2006) A 12-28-year followup study of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:91–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Franco V, Cerullo G, Cipolla M, Gianni E, Puddu G (2005) (ii) osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. Curr Orthop 19:415–427.Google Scholar
  23. Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S (1979) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am 10:585–608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gao L, Olah T, Cucchiarini M, Madry H (2018) Asymptomatic focal calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition within partially failed repair tissue after matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5136-7.
  25. Gardner MP, Chong AC, Pollock AG, Wooley PH (2010) Mechanical evaluation of large-size fourth-generation composite femur and tibia models. Ann Biomed Eng 38:613–620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Georgoulis AD, Makris CA, Papageorgiou CD, Moebius UG, Xenakis T, Soucacos PN (1999) Nerve and vessel injuries during high tibial osteotomy combined with distal fibular osteotomy: a clinically relevant anatomic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:15–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Giffin JR, Stabile KJ, Zantop T, Vogrin TM, Woo SL, Harner CD (2007) Importance of tibial slope for stability of the posterior cruciate ligament—deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 35:1443–1449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gomoll AH (2011) High tibial osteotomy for the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: a review of the literature, indications, and technique. Phys Sportsmed 39:45–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gwinner C, Weiler A, Roider M, Schaefer FM, Jung TM (2017) Tibial slope strongly influences knee stability after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective 5- to 15-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 45:355–361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hankemeier S, Mommsen P, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M, Brand J, Meyer C, Meller R (2010) Accuracy of high tibial osteotomy: comparison between open-and closed-wedge technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1328–1333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hantes ME, Natsaridis P, Koutalos AA, Ono Y, Doxariotis N, Malizos KN (2018) Satisfactory functional and radiological outcomes can be expected in young patients under 45 years old after open wedge high tibial osteotomy in a long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3199–3205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D (1987) Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:332–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hinterwimmer S, Beitzel K, Paul J, Kirchhoff C, Sauerschnig M, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Imhoff AB (2011) Control of posterior tibial slope and patellar height in open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med 39:851–856.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoemann C et al (2011) International cartilage repair society (ICRS) recommended guidelines for histological endpoints for cartilage repair studies in animal models and clinical trials. Cartilage 2:153–172.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Hui C et al (2011) Long-term survival of high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Am J Sports Med 39:64–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackson J, Waugh W (1961) Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:746–751.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW, Lee JS, Ha JH, Kim JH, Jeong JH (2014) Second-look arthroscopic assessment of cartilage regeneration after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 30:72–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, McLawhorn AS, Cross MB, Cornell CN, Padgett DE (2018) Patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: a systematic review. HSS J 14:192–201.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Kanamiya T, Naito M, Hara M, Yoshimura I (2002) The influences of biomechanical factors on cartilage regeneration after high tibial osteotomy for knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis: clinical and arthroscopic observations. Arthroscopy 18:725–729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaze AD, Maas S, Waldmann D, Zilian A, Dueck K, Pape D (2015) Biomechanical properties of five different currently used implants for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Exp Orthop 2:14.Google Scholar
  41. Keenan OJF, Clement ND, Nutton R, Keating JF (2018) Older age and female gender are independent predictors of early conversion to total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Knee. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2018.11.008.
  42. Kellgren J, Lawrence J (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Kessler OC, Jacob HA, Romero J (2002) Avoidance of medial cortical fracture in high tibial osteotomy: improved technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395:180–185.Google Scholar
  44. Kim KI, Seo MC, Song SJ, Bae DK, Kim DH, Lee SH (2017) Change of chondral lesions and predictive factors after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with a locked plate system. Am J Sports Med 45:1615–1621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kim S-J, Moon H-K, Chun Y-M, Chang W-H, Kim S-G (2011) Is correctional osteotomy crucial in primary varus knees undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1421–1426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kornilov N, Kulyaba T, Petukhov A, Ignatenko V, Thienpont E (2015) Computer navigation helps achieving appropriate gap balancing and restoration of alignment in total knee arthroplasty for fixed valgus knee osteoarthritis irrespective of the surgical approach. Acta Orthop Belg 81:673–681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Krych AJ, Hevesi M, Desai VS, Camp CL, Stuart MJ, Saris DBF (2018) Learning from failure in cartilage repair surgery: an analysis of the mode of failure of primary procedures in consecutive cases at a tertiary referral center. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967118773041.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Lamm BM, Paley D (2004) Deformity correction planning for hindfoot, ankle, and lower limb. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 21:305–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. LaPrade RF, Barrera Oro F, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Walsh MP (2010) Patellar height and tibial slope after opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 38:160–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. LaPrade RF, Spiridonov SI, Nystrom LM, Jansson KS (2012) Prospective outcomes of young and middle-aged adults with medial compartment osteoarthritis treated with a proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy. Arthroscopy 28:354–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lattermann C, Jakob R (1996) High tibial osteotomy alone or combined with ligament reconstruction in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 4:32–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD (2003) Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:132–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Loia MC, Vanni S, Rosso F, Bonasia DE, Bruzzone M, Dettoni F, Rossi R (2016) High tibial osteotomy in varus knees: indications and limits. Joints 4:98–110.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Luyten FP, Denti M, Filardo G, Kon E, Engebretsen L (2012) Definition and classification of early osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:401–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Maas S, Diffo Kaze A, Dueck K, Pape D (2013) Static and dynamic differences in fixation stability between a spacer plate and a small stature plate fixator used for high tibial osteotomies: a biomechanical bone composite study. ISRN Orthop 2013:387620.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Madry H, Luyten FP, Facchini A (2012) Biological aspects of early osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:407–422.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Madry H et al (2013) Effect of open wedge high tibial osteotomy on the lateral compartment in sheep. Part I: analysis of the lateral meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:39–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Madry H et al (2016) Early osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1753–1762.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Madry H et al (2017) Surgical anatomy of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: crucial steps and pitfalls. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3661–3669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Magnussen RA, Duthon V, Servien E, Neyret P (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and osteoarthritis: evidence from long-term follow-up and potential solutions. Cartilage 4:22s–26s.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Magnussen RA, Lustig S, Demey G, Neyret P, Servien E (2011) The effect of medial opening and lateral closing high tibial osteotomy on leg length. Am J Sports Med 39:1900–1905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Marini JC et al (2017) Osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3:17052.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Marriott K, Birmingham TB, Kean CO, Hui C, Jenkyn TR, Giffin JR (2015) Five-year changes in gait biomechanics after concomitant high tibial osteotomy and ACL reconstruction in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 43:2277–2285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Müller M, Strecker W (2008) Arthroscopy prior to osteotomy around the knee? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1217–1221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Musahl V, Zaffagnini S, LaPrade R, Hirschmann MT, Karlsson J (2015) The challenge of treating complex knee instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2769–2770.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Nagel A, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1996) Proximal tibial osteotomy.: a subjective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1353–1358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Naudie D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Bourne TJ (1999) The install award. Survivorship of the high tibial valgus osteotomy. A 10- to −22-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:18–27.Google Scholar
  68. Niemeyer P, Schmal H, Hauschild O, von Heyden J, Sudkamp NP, Kostler W (2010) Open-wedge osteotomy using an internal plate fixator in patients with medial-compartment gonarthritis and varus malalignment: 3-year results with regard to preoperative arthroscopic and radiographic findings. Arthroscopy 26:1607–1616.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Niemeyer P et al (2016) Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for cartilage defects of the knee: a guideline by the working group “clinical tissue regeneration” of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU). Knee 23:426–435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Nordenvall R, Bahmanyar S, Adami J, Stenros C, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L (2012) A population-based nationwide study of cruciate ligament injury in Sweden, 2001-2009: incidence, treatment, and sex differences. Am J Sports Med 40:1808–1813.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Hewett TE (2000) High tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction for varus angulated anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 28:282–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Odenbring S et al (1989) Function after tibial osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis below aged 50 years. Acta Orthop Scand 60:527–531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Outerbridge R (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:752–757.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Pape D, Adam F, Rupp S, Seil R, Kohn D (2004) Stability, bone healing and loss of correction after valgus realignment of the tibial head. A roentgen stereometry analysis. Der Orthopade 33:208–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Pape D, Adam F, Seil R, Georg T, Kohn D (2005) Fixation stability following high tibial osteotomy–a radiostereometric analysis. J Knee Surg 18:108–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Pape D, Dueck K, Haag M, Lorbach O, Seil R, Madry H (2013a) Wedge volume and osteotomy surface depend on surgical technique for high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:127–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Pape D, Kohn D, Van Giffen N, Hoffmann A, Seil R, Lorbach O (2013b) Differences in fixation stability between spacer plate and plate fixator following high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:82–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Pape D, Madry H (2013) The preclinical sheep model of high tibial osteotomy relating basic science to the clinics: standards, techniques and pitfalls. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:228–236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Pape D, Rupp S (2007) Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomies. Oper Tech Orthop 17:2–11.Google Scholar
  80. Parker DA, Beatty KT, Giuffre B, Scholes CJ, Coolican MR (2011) Articular cartilage changes in patients with osteoarthritis after osteotomy. Am J Sports Med 39:1039–1045.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Hewett TE (2014) Incidence of second ACL injuries 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med 42:1567–1573.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Perren S (2010) Optimizing the degree of fixation stability based on the strain theory. Der Orthopade 39:132–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Pitto RP, Lang I, Kienapfel H, Willert HG (2002) The German arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 73:30–33.Google Scholar
  84. Puddu G (2002) Opening-wedge osteotomy: proximal tibia and distal femur. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery: reconstructive knee surgery:375–390.Google Scholar
  85. Puddu G, Cipolla M, Cerullo G, Franco V, Giannì E (2007) Osteotomies: the surgical treatment of the valgus knee. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 15:15–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Rand J, Neyret P (2005) ISAKOS meeting on the management of osteoarthritis of the knee prior to total knee arthroplasty. In: ISAKOS congress.Google Scholar
  87. Razi M, Salehi S, Dadgostar H, Cherati AS, Moghaddam AB, Tabatabaiand SM, Dodaran MS (2013) Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and incidence of meniscal and chondral injury within the knee. Int J Prev Med 4:S98–s103.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Rinonapoli E, Aglietti P, Mancini GB, Buzzi R (1988) High tibial osteotomy in the treatment of arthritic varus knee. A medium term (small) review of 61 cases. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 14:283–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Robin JG, Neyret P (2016) High tibial osteotomy in knee laxities: concepts review and results. EFORT Open Rev 1:3–11.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Rosenberg T, Paulos L, Parker R, Coward D, Scott S (1988) The forty-five-degree posteroanterior flexion weight-bearing radiograph of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:1479–1483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Rudan JF, Simurda MA (1990) High tibial osteotomy. A prospective clinical and roentgenographic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:251–256.Google Scholar
  92. Salzmann GM, Ahrens P, Naal FD, El-Azab H, Spang JT, Imhoff AB, Lorenz S (2009) Sporting activity after high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 37:312–318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Savarese E, Bisicchia S, Romeo R, Amendola A (2011) Role of high tibial osteotomy in chronic injuries of posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner. J Orthop Traumatol 12:1–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Schroter S, Ateschrang A, Ihle C, Stockle U, Konstantinidis L, Dobele S (2014) Lateral hinge fractures in open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Der Orthopade 43:1000–1007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Servien E, Acquitter Y, Hulet C, Seil R (2009) Lateral meniscus lesions on stable knee: a prospective multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:S60–S64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Shelburne KB, Kim HJ, Sterett WI, Pandy MG (2011) Effect of posterior tibial slope on knee biomechanics during functional activity. J Orthop Res 29:223–231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Skomoroshko PV, Vilensky VA, Hammouda AI, Fletcher MDA, Solomin LN (2014) Determination of the maximal corrective ability and optimal placement of the Ortho-SUV frame for femoral deformity with respect to the soft tissue envelope, a biomechanical modelling study. Adv Orthop 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/268567.
  98. Solomin L, Shchepkina E, Korchagin K, Sabirov F, Takata M, Tsuchiya H (2017) The new method of long bone multilevel deformities correction using the orthopedic hexapod (preliminary report). Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii 23:103–109.Google Scholar
  99. Song E, Seon J, Park S, Jeong M (2010) The complications of high tibial osteotomy: closing-versus opening-wedge methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1245–1252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Staubli AE, Jacob HA (2010) Evolution of open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy: experience with a special angular stable device for internal fixation without interposition material. Int Orthop 34:167–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Sterett WI, Steadman JR, Huang MJ, Matheny LM, Briggs KK (2010) Chondral resurfacing and high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee: survivorship analysis. Am J Sports Med 38:1420–1424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Kumagai K, Yamaguchi Y, Chiba N, Akamatsu Y, Saito T (2012) Fractures around the lateral cortical hinge after a medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a new classification of lateral hinge fracture. Arthroscopy 28:85–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Tetsworth K, Paley D (1994) Malalignment and degenerative arthropathy. Orthop Clin North Am 25:367–378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Tischer T, Paul J, Pape D, Hirschmann MT, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S, Feucht MJ (2017) The impact of osseous malalignment and realignment procedures in knee ligament surgery: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Orthop J Sports Med 5:2325967117697287.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  105. Trieb K, Grohs J, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Stulnig T, Panotopoulos J, Wanivenhaus A (2006) Age predicts outcome of high-tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:149–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Trinh TQ, Harris JD, Siston RA, Flanigan DC (2013) Improved outcomes with combined autologous chondrocyte implantation and patellofemoral osteotomy versus isolated autologous chondrocyte implantation. Arthroscopy 29:566–574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Verdonk PC, Verstraete KL, Almqvist KF, De Cuyper K, Veys EM, Verbruggen G, Verdonk R (2006) Meniscal allograft transplantation: long-term clinical results with radiological and magnetic resonance imaging correlations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:694–706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Voos JE et al (2012) Effect of tibial slope on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1626–1631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Waller C, Hayes D, Block JE, London NJ (2011) Unload it: the key to the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1823–1829.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. W-Dahl A, Robertsson O, Lidgren L (2010) Surgery for knee osteoarthritis in younger patients: a Swedish register study. Acta Orthop 81:161–164.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  111. Wolcott M, Traub S, Efird C (2010) High tibial osteotomies in the young active patient. Int Orthop 34:161–166.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  112. Won HH, Chang CB, Je MS, Chang MJ, Kim TK (2013) Coronal limb alignment and indications for high tibial osteotomy in patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3504–3511.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  113. Ziegler R, Goebel L, Seidel R, Cucchiarini M, Pape D, Madry H (2015) Effect of open wedge high tibial osteotomy on the lateral tibiofemoral compartment in sheep. Part III: analysis of the microstructure of the subchondral bone and correlations with the articular cartilage and meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2704–2714.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement