Open Access

Role of mesenchymal stem cells in meniscal repair

  • Peter Angele1, 2Email author,
  • Richard Kujat1,
  • Matthias Koch1 and
  • Johannes Zellner1
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics20141:12

DOI: 10.1186/s40634-014-0012-y

Received: 1 July 2014

Accepted: 5 August 2014

Published: 2 September 2014

Abstract

Meniscus integrity is the key for joint health of the knee. Therefore, the main goal of every meniscus treatment should be the maintenance of as much meniscus tissue as possible.

Repair of meniscus tears can be achieved by meniscus suture. However, in a recently published meta-analysis, the long-term outcome of meniscus repair showed a mean failure rate of 24%.

In a preclinical trial, locally applied mesenchymal stem cells produced differentiated meniscus-like tissue in meniscus tears indicating that mesenchymal-based cells, harvested from the bone marrow, enhance meniscus healing in critical-size meniscus tears.

Symptomatic meniscus defects offer the option for meniscus transplantation with porous cell free biomaterials, when a complete meniscus rim is available. Cell-free biomaterials, which are actually in clinical application, reveal variable outcome in mid-term results from complete failure to regeneration with meniscus-like tissue.

In several preclinical studies with different critical-size defects in the meniscus, the application of mesenchymal stem cells could significantly enhance meniscus regeneration compared to empty defects or to cell-free biomaterials.

Regenerative treatment of meniscus with mesenchymal stem cells seems to be a promising approach to treat meniscal tears and defects. However it is still not clear, whether the stem cell effect is a direct action of the mesenchymal-based cells or is rather mediated by secretion of certain stimulating factors. The missing knowledge of the underlying mechanism is one of the reasons for regulatory burdens to permit these stem cell-based strategies in clinical practice. Other limitations are the necessity to expand cells prior to transplantation resulting in high treatment costs. Alternative treatment modalities, which use growth factors concentrated from peripheral blood aspirates or mononucleated cells concentrated from bone marrow aspirates, are currently in development in order to allow an attractive one-step procedure without the need for cell expansion in cultures and thus lower efforts and costs.

In summary, Tissue Engineering of meniscus with mesenchymal based cells seems to be a promising approach to treat meniscal tears and defects in order to restore native meniscus tissue. However, advances of the technology are necessary to allow clinical application of this modern regenerative therapy.

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cells Meniscus tear Meniscus suture Meniscus transplantation Biomaterial

Introduction

Meniscal lesions represent the most common intra-articular knee injury, and are the most frequent cause of surgical procedures performed by orthopaedic surgeons (Makris et al. [2011]). The mean annual incidence of meniscal lesions has been reported to be 66 per 100.000 inhabitants, 61 of which result in meniscectomy (Makris et al. [2011]). The changes in “pivoting” sports activities in the past few decades have resulted in increased injury rates of the meniscus (1.5 million injuries in Germany per year) (Stein et al. [2010]). Especially in combination with anterior cruciate ligament injuries a high incidence of meniscal lesions (40-80%) can be detected.

Meniscus integrity is the key for joint health of the knee. Untreated meniscus tears cause intermittent pain, joint swelling, recurrent mechanical symptoms (clicking, catching, giving way) and, therefore, significant reduction in quality of life in predominately young and active patients (McDermott [2011]).

In the long-term, meniscus tears can result in the onset of joint degeneration and, finally, knee osteoarthritis with all its consequences including pain, immobility and knee arthroplasty (Lohmander et al. [2007]; Stein et al. [2010]; Borchers et al. [2011]; Jeong et al. [2012]; Badlani et al. [2013]). In a recent published case–control study (Level of evidence 3) specific meniscus tear morphologies (Meniscus extrusion, complex tears, tears with large radial involvement) have shown to be significantly more common in patients with progressive development of osteoarthritic changes in a 2 year follow-up indicating that these meniscus tears represent a negative prognostic risk factor for later development of osteoarthritis (Badlani et al. [2013]).

Removal of meniscus tears lead to short term relief of clinical symptoms, but to knee osteoarthitis in long-term (Salata et al. [2010]; Paxton et al. [2011]; Papalia et al. [2011]; Jeong et al. [2012]). Especially the amount meniscus removed, lateral meniscectomy and longer duration of clinical symptoms preoperatively have been identified as negative prognostic risk factors for the onset of osteoarthritis in systematic reviews (Papalia et al. [2011]; Jeong et al. [2012]). Elevated expression levels of arthritis-related markers in meniscus tears in patients under forty years old, compared to patients over forty years, and in patients with meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament tears, compared to patients with isolated meniscus tears, indicate an increased catabolic response suggesting a higher risk for progression of osteoarthritis following partial meniscectomy (Brophy and Matava [2012]).

Knowing the risk for the onset of osteoarthritis after meniscectomy, the majority of meniscus tears are still treated with partial meniscectomy as shown in a huge cohort of more than 1000 young patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (Fetzer et al. [2009]).

Therefore, the main goal of every meniscus treatment should be the maintenance of as much meniscus tissue as possible (Fetzer et al. [2009]; Starke et al. [2009]; Stein et al. [2010]; Abrams et al. [2013]). This includes repair of meniscus tears and regeneration of meniscus defects after meniscectomy with regenerative treatment approaches.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in using mesenchymal stem cells to regenerate damaged tissue such as injured hyaline cartilage or meniscus. These mesenchymal stem cells fulfill a dual role for musculoskeletal repair, because they have the potential to differentiate into the repair cells themselves and to produce special growth factors for its repair (Caplan and Dennis [2006]). This review focuses on the present and future treatment options especially for meniscus repair and meniscus regeneration given by the use of intrinsic or exogenous applied mesenchymal stem cells.

Review

Endogenous repair cells of meniscus injury

Currently, a number of potential repair cells for meniscus regeneration are available. Repair cells of meniscus injury can either be located in the meniscus tissue itself or entering the meniscus predominately via circulation. In the following section, we will focus on the availability of repair cells and repair potential of the meniscus.

Endogenous repair of meniscus injury seems to be dependent of the different vascularisation of the outer and the inner zone of the meniscus (Arnoczky [1999]). Repair in the vascularized outer zone can be achieved (McDermott [2011]), but fail to encourage healing in the avascular inner zone of the meniscus (Hasan et al. [2014]; Makris et al. [2011]). However, in several studies also regeneration could be seen in the inner zone of the meniscus indicating regenerative potential independently from the vascularization (Nakata et al. [2001]; Hennerbichler et al. [2007]; Baker et al. [2009]; Pabbruwe et al. [2010]). Hennerbichler et al. have shown in an experimental setup, that punch defects, which were directly filled with the removed punches, showed no significant difference in healing potential between the vascularized and avascularized meniscus zone (Hennerbichler et al. [2007]). Croutze and coworkers could demonstrate equivalent differentiation potential toward chondrogenic phenotype and extracellular matrix production of isolated human meniscus cells from the inner and the outer zone (Croutze et al. [2013]). Different studies stated that milieu factors like oxygen tension (Croutze et al. [2013]) and growth factors (Pabbruwe et al. [2010]) may play a key role in modulating redifferentiation of meniscal fibrochondrocytes at least in vitro.

From a clinical standpoint, meniscus cells from meniscectomised tissue would be the ideal cell source for repair. Is this approach applicable? Nakata et al. have shown feasibility of meniscus regeneration by expansion of human meniscus cells from meniscectomised tissue (Nakata et al. [2001]). With the same cell source Baker et al. could achieve repair tissue with equivalent mechanical properties than native meniscus tissue (Baker et al. [2009]). However the low proliferation rate and matrix production limit the use of this cell type (Nakata et al. [2001]). In addition, potential candidates for meniscus transplantation have already undergone partial meniscectomy with the necessity to find alternative cell sources.

Stem cells are characterized by self-renewal capacity and multilineage differentiation potential to a variety of cell types of mesenchymal tissue like bone, cartilage or fat (Caplan [1991]; Caplan and Dennis [2006]). Recently, the stem cell perspective has changed by identification of pericytes around almost every blood vessel in the body, which contain stem cell characteristics (Bianco et al. [2008]; Bianco [2011]; Crisan et al. [2008]; Crisan et al. [2011]). The existing traditional view, which focuses on the multipotent differentiation capacity of these cells, has been expanded to include their equally interesting role as cellular modulators that bring them into a broader therapeutic scenario (Caplan and Correa [2011]).

With this background, it is not surprising that Osawa et al. have identified in the vascularized region of the meniscus more blood-vessel derived stem cells (CD34- and CD146-positive cells) than in the avascular region. These meniscal-derived stem cells were multipotent and contributed to meniscal regeneration, which they proof via transplantation in knee joints of athymic rats (Osawa et al. [2013]).

Does also the avascular inner zone of the meniscus contain stem cells? Stem cells have been identified in the surface zone of other avascular tissue, mainly in the articular cartilage (Archer et al. [1994]; Dowthwaite et al. [2004]; McCarthy et al. [2012]), but little is known about meniscus stem cells. Mauck et al. describes regional multilineage differentiation potential of meniscus cells in both zones available, however showed differences in pluripotency between the zones (Mauck et al. [2007]). Especially, pluripotent cells from the avascular tissue seem to lack osteogenic differentiation potential, which could be of clinical interest for meniscus regenerative approaches (Mauck et al. [2007]; McCarthy et al. [2012]).

Besides existence of mesenchymal stem cells in the meniscus, the synovium and the synovial fluid contain stem cells for meniscus regeneration (Sakaguchi et al. [2005]; Horie et al. [2009]; Matsukura et al. [2014]). Matsukura and coworkers found elevated levels of mesenchymal stem cells in the synovium fluid after meniscus injury compared to normal knee joints suggesting that mesenchymal stem cells in the fluid may play a role in regeneration of meniscus (Matsukura et al. [2014]). Horie and coworkers showed promotion of meniscal regeneration in rat massive meniscal defects by intra-articular injection of synovial stem cells. The injected cells adhere to the lesion site, directly differentiate in meniscus cells and promote meniscal regeneration without mobilization to distant organs (Horie et al. [2009]).

In summary, local or systemic stem cells seem to play a fundamental and essential role in the regeneration of meniscus injury, either as direct repair cells or as a source for secretion of bioactive modulators.

Repair of meniscus tears with meniscus suture

If the meniscus repair succeeds then the patient is left with a normal or near-normal meniscus, and thus no increased risk of osteoarthritis in the future (McDermott [2011]; Stein et al. [2010]; Paxton et al. [2011]). In a cohort study (Level of evidence 3) no osteoarthritic progress was detectable in 80% of the patients after meniscus repair compared with 40% after meniscectomy in a long-term follow-up (mean 9 years) (Stein et al. [2010]). In a systematic review meniscal repair showed superior clinical outcome detected by higher Lysholm scores and less radiologic degeneration than meniscectomy (Paxton et al. [2011]). However, in a recently published meta-analysis, the long-term outcome of meniscal repair showed a mean failure rate of 23,1% (Nepple et al. [2012]).

Augmentation of meniscus suture

Given the low healing potential of meniscus in the avascular zone and the moderate healing rates of meniscus repair in the vascular zone, there is a strong need for true regeneration of viable and biomechanically functional meniscus tissue.

Several methods have been devised to aid the healing of the meniscus, ranging from refreshing the meniscus tears with rasps and creation of access channels in the meniscus base to introduce blood and reparative cells to meniscus tears (Scotti et al. [2013]) (Figure 1). The use of fibrin clots, synovial flaps and resorbable scaffolds in or around the tears were also described in the literature in order to enhance meniscus healing potential (Hasan et al. [2013]; Starke et al. [2009]).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40634-014-0012-y/MediaObjects/40634_2014_Article_12_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Medial meniscus tear and meniscus repair in a right knee joint: Meniscus tear recognized by a probe (upper left); Meniscus tear preparation with a grasp, which refreshes the tear site (upper right); Meniscus suture with all inside technique (Fast T Fix, Smith nephew) (lower left); Stable meniscus tear after repair (lower right).

Exogenous fibrin clots seem to improve healing in animal models and in humans (Starke et al. [2009]). It is postulated that the clot serves as a chemotactic and mitogenous stimulus. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which contains the majority of growth factors in the peripheral blood, seems to promote the clinical healing of meniscus tears even in the white-white zone (Wei et al. [2012]) mainly in the earlier period after meniscal suture. However, the clinical use of this intriguing arthroscopically applicable, one-step procedure for meniscus repair is actually not tested in prospective trials due to regulatory burdens.

Augmentation of meniscus suture with mesenchymal stem cells

Preclinical trials have shown enhanced healing of meniscal lesions with the application of mesenchymal based cells (Table 1) (Table 2) (Hasan et al. [2013]; Makris et al. [2011]; Izuta et al. [2005]; Angele et al. [2008]; Zellner et al. [2010]; Zellner et al. [2013]). Locally applied expanded mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow have achieved regeneration of longitudinal meniscus tears in the avascular zone in the lateral meniscus of New Zealand White Rabbits. Control groups with untreated tears, treatment with meniscus suture alone or meniscus suture in combination with implanted cell-free biomaterials revealed no recognizable healing indicating the development of a critical size meniscus tear model. In contrast, mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow in combination with hyaluronan collagen carriers resulted in meniscal repair with differentiated meniscus-like tissue detected by histology, immunohistochemistry and biomechanical analysis (Figure 2) (Zellner et al. [2013]).
Table 1

Mesenchymal stem cells for meniscus regeneration

Pro/advantages

Cons/disadvantages

• High regenerative potential

• High treatment costs

• Self renewal capacity

• Regulatory burden

• Cellular modulation at lesion site

• Missing knowledge of underlying repair mechanisms

• Potential of differentiation into meniscal repair cells

• Possible need for cell expansions prior to application

• Secretion of bioactive substances like growth factors

• Support/promotion of intrinsic meniscal healing capacity

Table 2

Regenerative treatment options for meniscal lesions

Treatment

Pro/Cons

Augmentation of meniscal suture and meniscus reconstruction by intraarticular microfracturing

+ Easy to perform

+ Adhesion of stem cells at lesion site

- Uncertain effect

- Low concentration of stem cells at defect site

Augmentation of meniscal suture or meniscus cell-free reconstruction (e.g. Actifit) by locally applied growth factors (e.g. PRP)

+ Application directly at meniscal lesion site

+ High concentration at lesion site

+ Support of intrinsic healing potential

+ One-step-procedure

- Preparation time

- Short term effect at lesion site

- Uncertain local effect

Augmentation of meniscal suture by locally applied MSCs (e.g. bone marrow derived)

+ High potential differentiation

+ Application directly at meniscal lesion site

+ Support of meniscus regeneration

+ Use of autologous cells

+ Potentially one-step-procedure

- Preparation time

- Regulatory burden

- Missing knowledge of repair mechanisms

Intraarticular injection of MSCs/growth factors

+ Adhesion at lesion site

+ Easy to perform

- Uncertain effect

- Low concentration of stem cells at lesion site

- Harvesting and preparation prior to application

- Side effects in the knee joint beside the defect site

Intravascular injection of MSCs

+ Adhesion at lesion site

- Uncertain effect

- Low concentration of stem cells at lesion site

- Harvesting and preparation prior to application

- Side effects in other areas besides the defect

- No clinical experience

Implantation of MSC loaded carrier/scaffold at meniscal defect site

+ Potential for treatment of meniscal critical size defects

+ Application directly at meniscal defect site

+ Option for pre-differentiation of MSC/carrier construct

+ Use of autologous cells

- High costs

- Missing knowledge of repair mechanisms

- Necessity of cell expansion prior to implantation/two-step-procedure

- No clinical experience

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40634-014-0012-y/MediaObjects/40634_2014_Article_12_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Treatment of meniscal tears (rabbit) in the avascular zone with a mesenchymal stem cell matrix composite resulted in a stable repair compared to implantation of a cell free scaffold: Representative macroscopic views, histological (toluidine blue) and immunohistochemical (collagen type II) slides of menisci and the meniscal repair tissue 3 months after treatment of tears in the avascular zone: A, B, C: treatment with hyaluronan-collagen composite matrices loaded with mesenchymal stem cells; D, E, F: treatment with a cell-free composite matrix (control).

It is not clear whether this is a direct action of the mesenchymal-based cells or is rather mediated by secretion of certain stimulating factors (Starke et al. [2009]). Despite the fact, that meniscus regeneration seems to be feasible by growth factors and mononucleated cells, none of the cell-based strategies has entered clinical practice to date (Scotti et al. [2013]). The implementation of cell-based strategies is mainly limited by regulatory burdens and by the necessity to expand cells prior to transplantation resulting in high treatment costs.

Regeneration of meniscus defects

Searching for optimal restoration of meniscal tissue, biocompatible scaffolds came in the focus for treatment of large meniscal defects in the last decade. The rationale for using cell-free biomaterials after extensive loss of meniscal tissue is based on repopulation of the scaffold by host cells recruited from the synovium or the meniscal remnants (Scotti et al. [2013]) (Figure 3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40634-014-0012-y/MediaObjects/40634_2014_Article_12_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Meniscus transplantation with cell-free biomaterial after subtotal meniscectomy of the medial meniscus (Actifit). Subtotal meniscectomy, note the residual meniscus base (upper left); Measurement of the meniscus defect for preparation of suitable biomaterial (upper right); Insertion of the cell-free biomaterial and fixation with all-inside and outside-in suture techniques (lower row).

Two biomaterials are currently in clinical use. The collagen meniscus implant (CMI) was the first scaffold for meniscus replacement. Some authors report satisfactory clinical outcome (Rodkey et al. [1999]) while MRI and histological results are controversial. Steadman and Rodkey ([2005]) saw a tendency of shrinking over time and no histological remnants of the collagen scaffold 5–6 years after implantation (Steadman and Rodkey [2005]). Martinek et al. ([2006]) described predominantly scar tissue formation instead of fibrocartilage after implantation (Martinek et al. [2006]). The second biomaterial is a polyurethane based scaffold called Actifit. The first 12 month report showed tissue ingrowth into the scaffold at this time and consistent regeneration in MRI and biopsies (Verdonk et al. [2011]).

However, there are no data on the mid- and long term effects of the CMI or the Actifit on the surrounding cartilage in order to prove the beneficial effect on prevention of early onset of osteoarthritis after loss of meniscus tissue. The amount of the developed repair tissue and its quality induced by the cell-free implants still seem to be crucial and improvable. Scar formation, repair tissue rich of vessels and vascularization into the tip of the new meniscus tissue show the need of improvement of this treatment technique. Additionally the biomechanical stability and the intraoperative handling have to be optimized for better clinical results. At the moment the cell-free meniscus implants are only used in a very selective group of patients. Despite promising short term results of meniscal implants, none of them has currently demonstrated regeneration of a functional, long-lasting meniscal tissue.

As biomaterials for meniscal substitution need a stable and intact rim of the native meniscus, allogenic meniscal transplantation is actually the only biologic treatment option available for totally meniscectomized knee joints (Lubowitz et al. [2007]). A recently published meta-analysis concluded that this procedure is an effective technique for these very selected patients (Elattar et al. [2011]). However fixation of the allograft, the limited availability and the frequent mismatch of graft and host tissue (Shaffer et al. [2000]) are still problems of this procedure. In addition, long term protection from joint degeneration has not yet been demonstrated (Wirth et al. [2002]).

Stem cells for regeneration of meniscus defects

In experimental trials different settings have been tested for mesenchymal stem cell based Tissue Engineering approaches for treatment of meniscus defects (Table 1). Stem cells can be administered by different ways of application. In most studies, the local application of mesenchymal stem cells has been used (Table 2).

Ishimura et al. ([1991]) showed a faster and improved healing of avascular meniscal defects in a rabbit model by using bone marrow fibrin clot constructs compared to fibrin clot alone (Ishimura et al. [1991]). They postulated that the benefit of this treatment is due to the pluripotential stem cells in the bone marrow. In a scaffold-free engineered meniscal tissue Aufderheide and Athanasiou ([2007]) found a high tensile modulus and improved mechanical properties by a high density co-culture of fibrochondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells in ring shaped moulds (Aufderheide and Athanasiou [2007]). Despite these reults, for in vivo application of mesenchymal stem cells, scaffolds seem to be a useful tool to ensure a lasting effect of the cells directly at the defect site. Yamasaki et al. ([2008]) using cell-seeded rat decellularized meniscus scaffolds, concluded that cell seeded constructs are more effective than scaffolds alone (Yamasaki et al. [2008]). Multiple natural and synthetic scaffolds have been used to deliver cells to the meniscal injury (Sweigart and Athanasiou [2001]; Buma et al. [2004]; Scotti et al. [2013]). A hyluronan collagen composite matrix were found to be suitable for chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (Angele et al. [2009]). Treatment of meniscal full size defects with this scaffold seeded with autologous mesenchymal stem cells after resection of the pars intermedia of the medial meniscus in a rabbit model resulted in a complete defect filling after 3 months in vivo. Only treatment with mesenchymal stem cells was able repair this critical size meniscal defects with stable differentiated meniscus like tissue compared to untreated defects or the treatment with a cellfree hyaluronan collagen scaffold (Angele et al. [2008]). Similar results were detected for treatment of isolated avascular meniscal punch defects in the pars intermedia of the lateral meniscus in a rabbit model (Zellner et al. [2010]). After 3 months in vivo meniscal defects were filled with differentiated repair tissue after treatment with a hyaluronan collagen composite matrix seeded with mesenchymal stem cells (Figure 4). Interestingly precultured stem cell matrix constructs showed a reduced integration in the native meniscus while non precultured stem cell matrix constructs resulted in a completely integrated repair tissue indicating that also the grade of differentiation of the stem cell matrix construct seems to be an important factor for successful treatment of meniscus with stem cell based Tissue Engineering. In the same model growth factors applied by autologous PRP failed to repair the avascular meniscal punch defect. In summary, mesenchymal stem cells seem to play an essential role for treatment of meniscal defects.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40634-014-0012-y/MediaObjects/40634_2014_Article_12_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Treatment of meniscal defects (rabbit) in the avascular zone with a mesenchymal stem cell matrix composite resulted in defect filling with a differentiated meniscus like tissue compared to implantation of a cell free scaffold: Representative macroscopic views, histological (toluidine blue) and immunohistochemical (collagen type II) slides of menisci and the meniscal repair tissue 3 months after treatment of circular meniscal punch defects in the avascular zone; A, B, C: treatment with hyaluronan-collagen composite matrices loaded with mesenchymal stem cells; D, E, F: treatment with a cell-free composite matrix (control).

Ethical approval

The experimental studies were performed with permission of the Ethical comitee at the University Hospital Regensburg.

Conclusions

Tissue Engineering of meniscus with mesenchymal based cells seems to be a promising approach to treat meniscal tears and defects in order to restore as much native meniscal tissue as possible. In preclinical trials, treatment of meniscus tears only with suture or meniscus defects with cell-free biomaterials, which both represent the actual clinical practice, fail to show comparable results to mesenchymal cell based approaches.

Despite the fact, that meniscus regeneration seems to be feasible by growth factors and mesenchymal stem cells, none of the cell-based strategies has entered clinical practice to date. The implementation of cell-based strategies is mainly limited by regulatory burdens and by the necessity to expand cells prior to transplantation resulting in high treatment costs.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Daniela Drenkard and Svetlana Stryshkowa for their technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University Medical Center Regensburg
(2)
Sporthopaedicum Regensburg/Straubing

References

  1. Abrams GD, Frank RM, Gupta AK, Harris JD, McCormick FM, Cole BJ: Trends in meniscus repair and meniscectomy in the United States, 2005–2011. Am J Sports Med 2013,41(10):2333–2339. doi:10.1177/0363546513495641PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Angele P, Johnstone B, Kujat R, Zellner J, Nerlich M, Goldberg V, Yoo J: Stem cell based tissue engineering for meniscus repair. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008,85(2):445–455. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31480PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Angele P, Muller R, Schumann D, Englert C, Zellner J, Johnstone B, Yoo J, Hammer J, Fierlbeck J, Angele MK, Nerlich M, Kujat R: Characterization of esterified hyaluronan-gelatin polymer composites suitable for chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009,91(2):416–427. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32236PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer CW, Morrison H, Pitsillides AA: Cellular aspects of the development of diarthrodial joints and articular cartilage. J Anat 1994,184(Pt 3):447–456.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnoczky SP: Building a meniscus. Biologic considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, (367 Suppl): S244-S253.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Aufderheide AC, Athanasiou KA: Assessment of a bovine co-culture, scaffold-free method for growing meniscus-shaped constructs. Tissue Eng 2007,13(9):2195–2205. doi:10.1089/ten.2006.0291PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Badlani JT, Borrero C, Golla S, Harner CD, Irrgang JJ: The effects of meniscus injury on the development of knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Am J Sports Med 2013,41(6):1238–1244. doi:10.1177/0363546513490276PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker BM, Nathan AS, Huffman GR, Mauck RL: Tissue engineering with meniscus cells derived from surgical debris. Osteoarthr Cartil 2009,17(3):336–345. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2008.08.001PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bianco P: Minireview: the stem cell next door: skeletal and hematopoietic stem cell “niches” in bone. Endocrinology 2011,152(8):2957–2962. doi:10.1210/en.2011–0217PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bianco P, Robey PG, Simmons PJ: Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell 2008,2(4):313–319. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.03.002PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Borchers JR, Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, Wright RW: Intra-articular findings in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a comparison of the MOON and MARS study groups. Am J Sports Med 2011,39(9):1889–1893. doi:10.1177/0363546511406871PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Brophy RH, Matava MJ: Surgical options for meniscal replacement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012,20(5):265–272. doi:10.5435/jaaos-20–05–265PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Buma P, Ramrattan NN, van Tienen TG, Veth RP: Tissue engineering of the meniscus. Biomaterials 2004,25(9):1523–1532.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Caplan AI: Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 1991,9(5):641–650. doi:10.1002/jor.1100090504PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Caplan AI, Correa D: The MSC: an injury drugstore. Cell Stem Cell 2011,9(1):11–15. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.06.008PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Caplan AI, Dennis JE: Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem 2006,98(5):1076–1084. doi:10.1002/jcb.20886PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Crisan M, Deasy B, Gavina M, Zheng B, Huard J, Lazzari L, Peault B: Purification and long-term culture of multipotent progenitor cells affiliated with the walls of human blood vessels: myoendothelial cells and pericytes. Methods Cell Biol 2008, 86: 295–309. doi:10.1016/s0091–679x(08)00013–7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Crisan M, Corselli M, Chen CW, Peault B: Multilineage stem cells in the adult: a perivascular legacy? Organogenesis 2011,7(2):101–104.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Croutze R, Jomha N, Uludag H, Adesida A: Matrix forming characteristics of inner and outer human meniscus cells on 3D collagen scaffolds under normal and low oxygen tensions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013, 14: 353. doi:10.1186/1471–2474–14–353PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowthwaite GP, Bishop JC, Redman SN, Khan IM, Rooney P, Evans DJ, Haughton L, Bayram Z, Boyer S, Thomson B, Wolfe MS, Archer CW: The surface of articular cartilage contains a progenitor cell population. J Cell Sci 2004,117(Pt 6):889–897. doi:10.1242/jcs.00912PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Elattar M, Dhollander A, Verdonk R, Almqvist KF, Verdonk P: Twenty-six years of meniscal allograft transplantation: is it still experimental? A meta-analysis of 44 trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011,19(2):147–157. doi:10.1007/s00167–010–1351–6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Fetzer GB, Spindler KP, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Bergfeld JA, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Jones M, Kaeding CC, Marx RG, Matava MJ, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Wolcott M, Vidal A, Wolf BR, Wright RW: Potential market for new meniscus repair strategies: evaluation of the MOON cohort. J Knee Surg 2009,22(3):180–186.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Hasan J, Fisher J, Ingham E: Current strategies in meniscal regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013, ᅟ: ᅟ. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.33030Google Scholar
  24. Hasan J, Fisher J, Ingham E: Current strategies in meniscal regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014,102(3):619–634. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.33030PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hennerbichler A, Moutos FT, Hennerbichler D, Weinberg JB, Guilak F: Repair response of the inner and outer regions of the porcine meniscus in vitro. Am J Sports Med 2007,35(5):754–762. doi:10.1177/0363546506296416PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Horie M, Sekiya I, Muneta T, Ichinose S, Matsumoto K, Saito H, Murakami T, Kobayashi E: Intra-articular Injected synovial stem cells differentiate into meniscal cells directly and promote meniscal regeneration without mobilization to distant organs in rat massive meniscal defect. Stem Cells 2009,27(4):878–887. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2008–0616PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ishimura M, Tamai S, Fujisawa Y: Arthroscopic meniscal repair with fibrin glue. Arthroscopy 1991,7(2):177–181.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Izuta Y, Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Yamasaki T, Shinomiya R: Meniscal repair using bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: experimental study using green fluorescent protein transgenic rats. Knee 2005,12(3):217–223. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2001.06.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Jeong HJ, Lee SH, Ko CS: Meniscectomy. Knee Surg Relat Res 2012,24(3):129–136. doi:10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.3.129PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM: The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 2007,35(10):1756–1769. doi:10.1177/0363546507307396PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Lubowitz JH, Verdonk PC, Reid JB 3rd, Verdonk R: Meniscus allograft transplantation: a current concepts review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007,15(5):476–492. doi:10.1007/s00167–006–0216–5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Makris EA, Hadidi P, Athanasiou KA: The knee meniscus: structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials 2011,32(30):7411–7431. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.037PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Martinek V, Ueblacker P, Braun K, Nitschke S, Mannhardt R, Specht K, Gansbacher B, Imhoff AB: Second generation of meniscus transplantation: in-vivo study with tissue engineered meniscus replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006,126(4):228–234. doi:10.1007/s00402–005–0025–1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Matsukura Y, Muneta T, Tsuji K, Koga H, Sekiya I: Mesenchymal stem cells in synovial fluid increase after meniscus injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014,472(5):1357–1364. doi:10.1007/s11999–013–3418–4PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Mauck RL, Martinez-Diaz GJ, Yuan X, Tuan RS: Regional multilineage differentiation potential of meniscal fibrochondrocytes: implications for meniscus repair. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2007,290(1):48–58. doi:10.1002/ar.20419View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. McCarthy HE, Bara JJ, Brakspear K, Singhrao SK, Archer CW: The comparison of equine articular cartilage progenitor cells and bone marrow-derived stromal cells as potential cell sources for cartilage repair in the horse. Vet J 2012,192(3):345–351. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.08.036PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. McDermott I: Meniscal tears, repairs and replacement: their relevance to osteoarthritis of the knee. Br J Sports Med 2011,45(4):292–297. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.081257PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakata K, Shino K, Hamada M, Mae T, Miyama T, Shinjo H, Horibe S, Tada K, Ochi T, Yoshikawa H: Human meniscus cell: characterization of the primary culture and use for tissue engineering. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, (391 Suppl): S208-S218.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Nepple JJ, Dunn WR, Wright RW: Meniscal repair outcomes at greater than five years: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012,94(24):2222–2227. doi:10.2106/jbjs.k.01584PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Osawa A, Harner CD, Gharaibeh B, Matsumoto T, Mifune Y, Kopf S, Ingham SJ, Schreiber V, Usas A, Huard J: The use of blood vessel-derived stem cells for meniscal regeneration and repair. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013,45(5):813–823. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31827d1e06PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Pabbruwe MB, Kafienah W, Tarlton JF, Mistry S, Fox DJ, Hollander AP: Repair of meniscal cartilage white zone tears using a stem cell/collagen-scaffold implant. Biomaterials 2010,31(9):2583–2591. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.023PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Papalia R, Del Buono A, Osti L, Denaro V, Maffulli N: Meniscectomy as a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Br Med Bull 2011, 99: 89–106. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldq043PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Paxton ES, Stock MV, Brophy RH: Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: a systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 2011,27(9):1275–1288. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.03.088PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Rodkey WG, Steadman JR, Li ST: A clinical study of collagen meniscus implants to restore the injured meniscus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, (367 Suppl): S281-S292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Sakaguchi Y, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Muneta T: Comparison of human stem cells derived from various mesenchymal tissues: superiority of synovium as a cell source. Arthritis Rheum 2005,52(8):2521–2529. doi:10.1002/art.21212PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Salata MJ, Gibbs AE, Sekiya JK: A systematic review of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing meniscectomy. Am J Sports Med 2010,38(9):1907–1916. doi:10.1177/0363546510370196PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Scotti C, Hirschmann MT, Antinolfi P, Martin I, Peretti GM: Meniscus repair and regeneration: review on current methods and research potential. Eur Cell Mater 2013, 26: 150–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Shaffer B, Kennedy S, Klimkiewicz J, Yao L: Preoperative sizing of meniscal allografts in meniscus transplantation. Am J Sports Med 2000,28(4):524–533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Starke C, Kopf S, Petersen W, Becker R: Meniscal repair. Arthroscopy 2009,25(9):1033–1044. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.010PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG: Tissue-engineered collagen meniscus implants: 5- to 6-year feasibility study results. Arthroscopy 2005,21(5):515–525. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.01.006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Stein T, Mehling AP, Welsch F, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Jager A: Long-term outcome after arthroscopic meniscal repair versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for traumatic meniscal tears. Am J Sports Med 2010,38(8):1542–1548. doi:10.1177/0363546510364052PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Sweigart MA, Athanasiou KA: Toward tissue engineering of the knee meniscus. Tissue Eng 2001,7(2):111–129. doi:10.1089/107632701300062697PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Verdonk R, Verdonk P, Huysse W, Forsyth R, Heinrichs EL: Tissue ingrowth after implantation of a novel, biodegradable polyurethane scaffold for treatment of partial meniscal lesions. Am J Sports Med 2011,39(4):774–782. doi:10.1177/0363546511398040PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Wei LC, Gao SG, Xu M, Jiang W, Tian J, Lei GH: A novel hypothesis: the application of platelet-rich plasma can promote the clinical healing of white-white meniscal tears. Med Sci Monit 2012,18(8):HY47-HY50.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Wirth CJ, Peters G, Milachowski KA, Weismeier KG, Kohn D: Long-term results of meniscal allograft transplantation. Am J Sports Med 2002,30(2):174–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Yamasaki T, Deie M, Shinomiya R, Yasunaga Y, Yanada S, Ochi M: Transplantation of meniscus regenerated by tissue engineering with a scaffold derived from a rat meniscus and mesenchymal stromal cells derived from rat bone marrow. Artif Organs 2008,32(7):519–524. doi:10.1111/j.1525–1594.2008.00580.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Zellner J, Mueller M, Berner A, Dienstknecht T, Kujat R, Nerlich M, Hennemann B, Koller M, Prantl L, Angele M, Angele P: Role of mesenchymal stem cells in tissue engineering of meniscus. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010,94(4):1150–1161. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Zellner J, Hierl K, Mueller M, Pfeifer C, Berner A, Dienstknecht T, Krutsch W, Geis S, Gehmert S, Kujat R, Dendorfer S, Prantl L, Nerlich M, Angele P: Stem cell-based tissue-engineering for treatment of meniscal tears in the avascular zone. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013,101(7):1133–1142. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32922PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Angele et al. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.