Skip to main content

Table 4 Intervention, EMG variable, muscle(s) tested and main outcome for running

From: Neuromuscular activity of the lower-extremities during running, landing and changing-of-direction movements in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of electromyographic studies

Study

Task

EMG variable

Muscles

EMG outcome of interest for ACLR vs. intact/control leg

ES

Einarsson et al., 2021 [34]

Treadmill running at 12, 14 and 16 km·h−1

Peak EMG amplitude

BF, ST

↓ SM/ST EMG activity for hamstring graft

0.67(0.01;1.33)

Jafarnezhadgero et al., 2021 [46]

Running at 12 km·h−1 with 3 running strike patterns

Peak EMG amplitude

RF, VL, VM, BF, ST, GMD, GM, TA

↓ EMG activity for VM and ↑ for BF in ACLR (early stance) /↓ EMG activity for VL, VM, TA, GM in ACLR (late stance)

0.90–1.71 (VM), 0.83 (VL), 0.85 (BF), 0.94 (TA), 1.71 (GM)

Patras et al., 2012 [89]

10 min treadmill running at ~ 65% VO2max/10 min treadmill running at ~ 85% VO2max

Peak EMG amplitude during stance

VL, BF

Lack of progressive ↑ in EMG activity for VL in ACLR during 85% VO2max

Progressive ↑ in EMG activity for BF in ACLR during 85% VO2max

0.85(0.25;1.39) (VL, intact), 1.02(0.27;1.77) (VL, control), 0.28(0.09;0.49) (BF, intact), 0.33(0.12;0.45) (BF, control),

Patras et al., 2011 [92]

10 min treadmill running at ~ 85% VO2max

Peak EMG amplitude during stance

VL

↓ correlation between EMG activity and lactate threshold for ACLR

n/a

Patras et al., 2010 [91]

10 min treadmill running at ~ 65% VO2max/10 min treadmill running at ~ 85% VO2max

Peak EMG amplitude during stance

VL

Lack of progressive ↑ in EMG activity for VL in ACLR during 85% VO2max

0.57(0.14;0.99) (intact), 0.42(0.08;0.77) (control)

Patras et al., 2009 [90]

10 min treadmill running at ~ 65% VO2max/10 min treadmill running at ~ 85% VO2max

Peak EMG amplitude during stance

VL

Lack of progressive ↑ in EMG activity for VL in ACLR during 85% VO2max

0.69(0.34;1.04) (intact), 0.58(0.22;0.93) (control)

  1. Number in brackets corresponds to reference number
  2. VO2max maximal oxygen uptake, EMG Electromyographic, BF Biceps femoris, ST Semitendinosus, RF Rectus femoris, VL Vastus lateralis, VM Vastus medialis, GMD Gluteus medius, GM Gastrocnemius medial, TA Tibialis anterior, increase, decrease, ES Effect size (Cohen’s d) reported as mean(95%CI), n/a not available