Study | Task | EMG variable | Muscles | EMG outcome of interest for ACLR vs. intact/control leg | ES |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Einarsson et al., 2021 [34] | Treadmill running at 12, 14 and 16 km·h−1 | Peak EMG amplitude | BF, ST | ↓ SM/ST EMG activity for hamstring graft | 0.67(0.01;1.33) |
Jafarnezhadgero et al., 2021 [46] | Running at 12 km·h−1 with 3 running strike patterns | Peak EMG amplitude | RF, VL, VM, BF, ST, GMD, GM, TA | ↓ EMG activity for VM and ↑ for BF in ACLR (early stance) /↓ EMG activity for VL, VM, TA, GM in ACLR (late stance) | 0.90–1.71 (VM), 0.83 (VL), 0.85 (BF), 0.94 (TA), 1.71 (GM) |
Patras et al., 2012 [89] | 10 min treadmill running at ~ 65% VO2max/10 min treadmill running at ~ 85% VO2max | Peak EMG amplitude during stance | VL, BF | Lack of progressive ↑ in EMG activity for VL in ACLR during 85% VO2max Progressive ↑ in EMG activity for BF in ACLR during 85% VO2max | 0.85(0.25;1.39) (VL, intact), 1.02(0.27;1.77) (VL, control), 0.28(0.09;0.49) (BF, intact), 0.33(0.12;0.45) (BF, control), |
Patras et al., 2011 [92] | 10 min treadmill running at ~ 85% VO2max | Peak EMG amplitude during stance | VL | ↓ correlation between EMG activity and lactate threshold for ACLR | n/a |
Patras et al., 2010 [91] | 10 min treadmill running at ~ 65% VO2max/10 min treadmill running at ~ 85% VO2max | Peak EMG amplitude during stance | VL | Lack of progressive ↑ in EMG activity for VL in ACLR during 85% VO2max | 0.57(0.14;0.99) (intact), 0.42(0.08;0.77) (control) |
Patras et al., 2009 [90] | 10 min treadmill running at ~ 65% VO2max/10 min treadmill running at ~ 85% VO2max | Peak EMG amplitude during stance | VL | Lack of progressive ↑ in EMG activity for VL in ACLR during 85% VO2max | 0.69(0.34;1.04) (intact), 0.58(0.22;0.93) (control) |