From: The role of bone marrow stimulation in rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author | Method of repair | Retear rates | ASES | UCLA | Constant | VAS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMS | Non-BMS | BMS | Non-BMS | BMS | Non-BMS | BMS | Non-BMS | BMS | Non-BMS | ||
Lapner | double- row/suture bridge | 4 of 36 | 4 of 39 | 84 ± 17 | 85 ± 12 | – | – | 83 ± 12 | 81 ± 16 | – | – |
Ruiz Ibán | double-row/suture bridge | 7 of 36 | 14 of 33 | – | – | – | – | 84.8 ± 11.8 | 76.2 ± 24.1 | 0.9 ± 1.6 | 1.3 ± 2.1 |
Milano | single-row | 12 of 35 | 18 of 38 | – | – | – | – | 94.5 ± 14 | 92.7 ± 16.7 | – | – |
Toro | single-row(79)/double-row(44) | 3 of 48 | 7 of 47 | 96.9 ± 4.4 | 95.8 ± 7.6 | – | – | 92.9 ± 6 | 90.0 ± 11.2 | – | – |
Osti | single-row | 2 of 28 | 3 of 29 | – | – | 32.6 ± 6 | 32.1 ± 5.8 | 92.3 ± 7.7 | 91 ± 7.3 | – | – |
Pulatkan | single-row | 6 of 44 | 13 of 40 | – | – | – | – | 79.8 ± 8.4 | 75.5 ± 12.5 | 3.75 ± 1.75 | 3 ± 1.5 |
Jo | double-row(120)/single-row (control:4) | 10 of 45 | 19 of 42 | 87.75 ± 17.05 | 88.14 ± 15.16 | 31.33 ± 4.36 | 30.99 ± 5.08 | 76.28 ± 13.53 | 75.61 ± 14.67 | 1.09 ± 1.66 | 0.99 ± 1.46 |
Taniguchi | double-row | 4 of 44 | 16 of 67 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Kim | single-row | 17 of 56 | 15 of 42 | 87.4 ± 15.1 | 83.4 ± 13.5 | 28.5 ± 6.4 | 27.4 ± 6.7 | – | – | 1.2 ± 1.4 | 1.3 ± 1.4 |