Skip to main content

Table 3 Date of the included studies

From: The role of bone marrow stimulation in rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Method of repair

Retear rates

ASES

UCLA

Constant

VAS

  

BMS

Non-BMS

BMS

Non-BMS

BMS

Non-BMS

BMS

Non-BMS

BMS

Non-BMS

Lapner

double- row/suture bridge

4 of 36

4 of 39

84 ± 17

85 ± 12

83 ± 12

81 ± 16

Ruiz Ibán

double-row/suture bridge

7 of 36

14 of 33

84.8 ± 11.8

76.2 ± 24.1

0.9 ± 1.6

1.3 ± 2.1

Milano

single-row

12 of 35

18 of 38

94.5 ± 14

92.7 ± 16.7

Toro

single-row(79)/double-row(44)

3 of 48

7 of 47

96.9 ± 4.4

95.8 ± 7.6

92.9 ± 6

90.0 ± 11.2

Osti

single-row

2 of 28

3 of 29

32.6 ± 6

32.1 ± 5.8

92.3 ± 7.7

91 ± 7.3

Pulatkan

single-row

6 of 44

13 of 40

79.8 ± 8.4

75.5 ± 12.5

3.75 ± 1.75

3 ± 1.5

Jo

double-row(120)/single-row (control:4)

10 of 45

19 of 42

87.75 ± 17.05

88.14 ± 15.16

31.33 ± 4.36

30.99 ± 5.08

76.28 ± 13.53

75.61 ± 14.67

1.09 ± 1.66

0.99 ± 1.46

Taniguchi

double-row

4 of 44

16 of 67

Kim

single-row

17 of 56

15 of 42

87.4 ± 15.1

83.4 ± 13.5

28.5 ± 6.4

27.4 ± 6.7

1.2 ± 1.4

1.3 ± 1.4

  1. All the date was extracted from involved study at final follow up