Skip to main content

Table 1 Factors affecting mean absolute joint line error for each segment

From: Accuracy of joint line restoration based on three-dimensional registration of the contralateral tibial tuberosity and the fibular tip

  Counts (%) / mean ± SD Tibia
β (95% CI; p-value)
Fibula
β (95% CI; p-value)
TT + Fibular tip
β (95% CI; p-value)
Gender
 • Male 34 (70.8%)a 0.23 (− 0.88-1.34; 0.68) −0.25 (− 1.11-0.62; 0.57) −0.11 (− 0.65-0.43; 0.69)
 • Female 12 (25%)a
Height (cm) 176.2 ± 8.6 −0.03 (− 0.08-0.03; 0.40) 0.03 (− 0.02-0.07; 0.21) 0.02 (− 0.01-0.04; 0.28)
Weight (kg) 83.1 ± 16.5 0.00 (− 0.01-0.01; 0.62) 0.00 (− 0.01-0.01; 0.58) 0.00 (− 0.01-0.01; 0.93)
Tibia length (mm) 2.1 ± 1.4b 0.65 (0.38-0.92; < 0.001) 0.34 (0.13-0.55; 0.003) 0.12 (−0.02-0.25; 0.08)
Fibula length (mm) 2.9 ± 2.1b 0.06 (− 0.12-0.24; 0.49) 0.07 (− 0.07-0.20; 0.34) 0.07 (.-0.02-0.15; 0.12)
Fibular tip to JL distance (mm) 1.6 ± 1.1b 0.14 (− 0.28-0.56; 0.50) 0.37 (0.04-0.69; 0.029) 0.16 (−0.04-0.36; 0.11)
  1. Significant p-values marked bold
  2. β Regression coefficient, TT Tibial tuberosity. JL: Joint line
  3. aTwo missing gender information
  4. bAbsolute side-to-side differences reported