Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Fig. 6 | Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Fig. 6

From: Component gap control during posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty using the posterior condylar pre-cut technique

Fig. 6

Relationship between gap control size and the final CGs at knee extension. The final CGs after gap control 0 mm posterior to the cutting level (total 9 mm cut) (a), the final CGs after gap control 1 mm posterior to the cutting level (total 8 mm cut) (b) and final CGs after gap control 2 and 3 mm posterior to the cutting level (total under 7 mm cut) (c) were compared with the CGs with PS PCT at knee extension. (*P < 0.01). CG, component gap; PS PCT, posterior-stabilised pre-cut trial component

Back to article page