Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Fig. 5 | Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Fig. 5

From: Component gap control during posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty using the posterior condylar pre-cut technique

Fig. 5

Difference between BGs and CGs. Indicated is the difference between the estimated component gaps (CGs) from bone gaps (BGs), and the actual CGs with PS PCT and trial component at knee extension and flexion. The CGs estimated from BGs at knee extension (BG minus 9 mm) (a) and flexion (BG minus 10 mm) (b) were compared with the CGs with PS PCT and actual final CGs. (*P < 0.01). PS PCT, posterior-stabilised pre-cut trial component

Back to article page