Table 5 Robotic TKA versus Conventional TKA Survivorship
From: Computer and robotic – assisted total knee arthroplasty: a review of outcomes
Survivorship | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author | Year | Navigation | Implants | Follow-up | RATKA | CON TKA |
Kim [54] | 2020 | ROBODOC | PS Duracon | 15 years | 100% (n = 724) 84 | 100% (n = 724) 74 |
Jeon [55] | 2019 | ROBODOC | NextGen (Robotic) | 10 years | 98.8% (n = 84) | 97.5% (n = 79) |
Triathalon (conventional) | ||||||
Cho [56] | 2019 | ROBODOC | NextGen | 13.5 years | 98.8% (n = 160) | 98.5% (n = 230) |
Yang [53] | 2017 | ROBODOC | NextGen | 10 years | 97.1% (n = 71) | 92.3% (n = 42) |