Treatment | Pro/Cons |
---|---|
Augmentation of meniscal suture and meniscus reconstruction by intraarticular microfracturing | + Easy to perform |
+ Adhesion of stem cells at lesion site | |
- Uncertain effect | |
- Low concentration of stem cells at defect site | |
Augmentation of meniscal suture or meniscus cell-free reconstruction (e.g. Actifit) by locally applied growth factors (e.g. PRP) | + Application directly at meniscal lesion site |
+ High concentration at lesion site | |
+ Support of intrinsic healing potential | |
+ One-step-procedure | |
- Preparation time | |
- Short term effect at lesion site | |
- Uncertain local effect | |
Augmentation of meniscal suture by locally applied MSCs (e.g. bone marrow derived) | + High potential differentiation |
+ Application directly at meniscal lesion site | |
+ Support of meniscus regeneration | |
+ Use of autologous cells | |
+ Potentially one-step-procedure | |
- Preparation time | |
- Regulatory burden | |
- Missing knowledge of repair mechanisms | |
Intraarticular injection of MSCs/growth factors | + Adhesion at lesion site |
+ Easy to perform | |
- Uncertain effect | |
- Low concentration of stem cells at lesion site | |
- Harvesting and preparation prior to application | |
- Side effects in the knee joint beside the defect site | |
Intravascular injection of MSCs | + Adhesion at lesion site |
- Uncertain effect | |
- Low concentration of stem cells at lesion site | |
- Harvesting and preparation prior to application | |
- Side effects in other areas besides the defect | |
- No clinical experience | |
Implantation of MSC loaded carrier/scaffold at meniscal defect site | + Potential for treatment of meniscal critical size defects |
+ Application directly at meniscal defect site | |
+ Option for pre-differentiation of MSC/carrier construct | |
+ Use of autologous cells | |
- High costs | |
- Missing knowledge of repair mechanisms | |
- Necessity of cell expansion prior to implantation/two-step-procedure | |
- No clinical experience |