Skip to main content

Table 1 Fixation details of included studies

From: No difference in load to failure or stiffness between transosseous tunnels, suture anchors, and cortical buttons for pectoralis major tendon repair: a systematic review & meta-analysis

Study

Techniques compared & sample size

Cadaveric age

Anchors used

Number of tunnels

Number of anchors

Sutures used in tunnel

Number of buttons used

Type of button

Ultimate load to failure (N)

Stiffness (N/mm)

Methodologic quality assessment of included studies

Hart et al

6 SA; 6 BT

85 ± 3.49 years

Mitek GII Superanchors

4

4

2 #2 Orthocord sutures/tunnel; 1 Krackow and 1 Bunnell stitches/tunnel

N/A

N/A

 + 

 + 

MCMS

Rabuck et al

10 SA; 10 BT; 10 endobutton

54.4 (27–68) years

5 mm, PEEK Biocorkscrew, Arthrex Inc

4

3

3 No.2 Fiberwire, Arthrex

3

Titanium Pec Button, Arthrex

 + 

-

84.6%

Sherman et al

8 SA; 8 BT; 8 endobutton

73.1 years

5.5 mm Super QuickAnchors, Depuy Mitek

4

3

No. 2 Orthocord (Depuy Mitek)

3

Titanium Pec Button, Arthrex

 + 

 + 

92.3%

Edgar et al

8 BT; 8 endobutton

64.61 ± 7.62 years

N/A

4

N/A

2 No. 2 Fibrewire suture/tunnel

3

Pec Button, Arthrex

 + 

 + 

84.6%

Wilson et al

10 BT; 10 screw; 10 SA

NR

2.8 mm Lupine Loop Anchor, Depuy Mitek

4

3

N/A

N/A

N/A

 + 

-

100%

Thomas et al

11 BT; 11 endobutton

8 months

N/A

4

N/A

2 No. 2 Fibrewire suture/tunnel

1 with 2 No. 2 Fibrewire suture

Pec Button, Arthrex

 + 

-

76.9%