Skip to main content

Table 1 Robotic and conventional surgery techniques of included studies

From: A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens

Study

Techniques Compared

Conventional System

Robotic System

Resection Verification

Implant System

Singh et al

Robotic; conventional

ATTUNE Intuition

VELYS Robotic System (Depuy)

CT scan; White-light scan (Artec Spacer Spider 3D Scanner)

ATTUNE cruciate-retaining (DePuy)

Doan et al

Robotic; conventional

ATTUNE Intuition

VELYS Robotic System (Depuy)

Optical Scan (Artec Spacer Spider 3D Scanner)

ATTUNE cruciate-retaining (Depuy)

Seidenstein et al

Robotic; conventional

Persona (2), NextGen (1), Vanguard (1)

ROSA Knee System (Zimmer Biomet)

Optical navigation (Sesamoid Plasty V2)

Persona (2), NextGen(1), Vanguard (1)

Kim et al

Robotic; conventional

Zimmer NextGen

ORTHODOC (Curexo Inc, South Korea)

3D Ct Scan (BrightSpeed Edge WCT 8-channel scanner)

NextGen CR system

Hampp et al

Robotic; conventional

Stryker CR manual system

Mako System (Stryker)

Optical tracking navigation device

Stryker cruciate retaining instrumentation

Moon et al

Robotic; conventional

Zimmer NextGen system jigs

ROBODOC (Curexo Inc, South Korea)

3D CT Scan (BrightSpeed Edge WCT eight-channel scanner)

NextGen (Zimmer, IN)

Scholl et al

Robotic; conventional

Stryker Triathlon system

Stryker Mako system

CT Scan

Stryker