Nr | First author, year | Stability | PROMs | Activity, RTS rate | Mean follow up (years) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Shelbourne, 2004 | •Lachman: All knees negative •Mean KT-1000 difference: 2.1 ± 1.2 mm (range, 0–4 mm) | •Noyes score: 97.6 ± 2.9 (range, 91–100) IKDC subjective score: 95.4 ± 6.9 | •All patients were able to return to high school competitive sports | •3.4 |
2. | McIntosh, 2006 | •Lachman test: 15 patients -, one patient 1 + •Pivot shift: 15 patients -, one patient 1 + | •Lysholm score: 90 (range: 74 to 94) •IKDC subjective score: 99 (range, 94 to 100) | •10 patients (63%) returned to their identical preoperative sport •14 patients (87.5%) returned to their previous level of activity •Tegner activity scale: 8.1 (range, 7 to 9) | •3.4(2–9.3) |
3. | Liddle, 2008 | •Lachman test: negative in 16 patients and 1 + in 1 patient •Pivot shift: negative in 16 patients and 1 + in 1 patient | •Lysholm score: 97.5 (SD 2.6) | •Tegner activity scale: 8.1 (SD 0.8) | •4.4 |
4. | Cohen, 2009 | •KT-1000 difference: 2.0 + -1.0 mm | •IKDC score: 91.5 ± 5.7 •Lysholm Scale: 93.5 ± 4 | •NR | •4.5 |
5. | Streich et al. 2010 | •KT-1000 difference conservative: 4.3 ± 2.9 (SD) mm (range, 2–9 mm), side-to-side difference in KT-1000 difference operative: 1.8 ± 1.4 (SD) mm (mean, range, -1–5 mm) | •Operative group: IKDC median 95, Lysholm 93, conservative group, median of 87 points for IKDC and 84 points for the Lysholm | •Patients with ACL reconstruction: preoperative Tegner 7 ± 1.1, postoperative 7 ± 0.9 ( •Non operative treatment: preoperative Tegner 7 ± 0.7, postoperative 6 ± 0.84 | •5.8 |
6. | Mauch, 2011 | NR | NR | NR | 5 |
7. | Nikolaou, 2011 | •KT-1000/2000 difference 2 mm (range 0–3.5 mm) •Lachman test: 91patients – or + , 3 patients + + •Pivot-shift test: 2 patients positive (+ +) | Lysholm score: 89 (range 77–100) | •Tegner: 7 (range 5–9) before injury, 3 (range 0–4) pre-surgery 6 (range 4–8) postoperatively •94 patients, 73 (78%) returned to their identical preoperative sport | •3.2(2–5) |
8. | Courvoisier, 2011 | •KT 1000 difference: 1 mm (SD 1.5) | NR | NR | 2 |
9. | Hui, 2012 | •KT-1000 difference: 1.9 mm •Lachman: – 11 patients (69%) had a negative Lachman test finding, + 4 patients •Pivot shift: 14 -, 1 Pivot glide | •Lysholm knee score was 97 (range, 90–100) •IKDC subjective score was 96 (range, 84–100) | •All patients had returned to strenuous activities | •2.1 (1.8–2.8) |
10. | Redler, 2012 | •KT 1000 difference: 0.29 ± 1.07 mm | •Mean IKDC subjective 92.4 ± 10.0, •Lysholm 94.4 ± 8.8 | •Tegner: 8.6 ± 1.4 | •3.6 (2–7.2) |
11. | Memeo 2012 | •Lachman – in all patients •Pivot shift – in all patients | •OAK Score: 87.7 | •All patients have returned to their preinjury level of daily activity and athletic participation | •15 |
12. | Kumar, 2013 | •KT 1000 difference: 30 patients < 3mmin, 2 patients 4 to 5 mm | •Lysholm preoperatively 71.5, 86 postoperatively 95 | •Tegner preoperatively 4.03, postoperatively 7.66 | •6 (4–10.8) |
13. | Kohl, 2014 | •KT-1000: 5.9 ± 1.2 mm | •Lysholm: 94.0 (range 68–100) | •NR | •4 (2–8) |
14. | Calvo et al. (2015) | •KT 1000 difference: 2.58 mm (range, –2.7 to 7 mm) | •Lysholm: 89, IKDC subjective: 86 [P = .626 | •All patients returned to their previous sports activity •24 patients returned to a level equal or above preinjury level, 3 patients returned to a lower level | •10.6 (10–13) |
15 | Fauno, 2016 | •KT-1000 difference 5.2 mm preoperatively, 1.6 mm at postoperatively | •KOOS subscore symptoms preop. 69.1 ± 14.6, postop. 76.8 ± 15.1, pain preop. 67.2 ± 19.3 postop. 85.7 ± 14.4, activities of daily living preop. 73.8 ± 23.0 postop. 91.0 ± 11.7, sports/recreation preop 8.7 ± 29.1 postop. 69.2 ± 26.8, quality of life 35.4 ± 19.6 67.9 ± 23.9 | •Tegner preop. 2.8, postop. 6.1 ( | •5.6. ± 2.8 |
16. | Placella, 2016 | •KT-1000 difference preop.5.2 (range: 3.5 to 7) mm, postop.0.8 (range: 0 to 2.5) mm | •Lysholm; 100, IKDC score 98.58 (range: 95.4 to 100 | •Tegner: 9.2 before injury, 8.7 after surgery •All patients returned to playing sports after a mean period of •6.43 months (range: 4 to 7 months) | •8 |
17. | Pennock, 2019 | •NR | •Patient satisfaction 9.3 ± 1.1, SANE 91 ± 11, and Lysholm 95 ± 7, | •Tegner: 6.9 ± 1.9 | •2.8 |
18. | Astur, 2019 | •NR | •Lysholm score without ACL rerupture 90.6 ± 6.1 v •Lysholm score with ACL rerupture 58.8 ± 6.7 | •Tegner without ACL rerupture 7.0 ± 0.8 •Tegner witht ACL rerupture 4.9 ± 1.3, •Patients without ACL reruptures: 46.2% increased their activity, •46.2% returned to their preinjury level of activity, and •7.6% returned to a lower level of activity | •7.4 |
19. | Gosh, 2020 | •KT1000 difference (range) 2.0 (− 1 to 5) | •Median IKDC score/100 (range) 96 (82–100) | •NR | •2 |
20. | Hanssen, 2022 | •NR | •KOOS Symptoms 5 y 86 86 (68–93), Pain 5 y 107 94(83–100), AdL 5 y 107 99 (94–100), QoL 5 y 107 75 (50–88) | •NR | •6.9(5–9) |
21. | Kilkenny, 2022 | •NR | •IKDC Score 90.3 ± 7.9, 89.3 ± 7.6 | •Marx Score 11.9 ± 4.6 11.3 ± 4.6 •Total rate of RTP HT 100% BTB 92.6% | •2 |