Table 5 Mean values of the AMADEUS subscores for each rater respectively. A Kruskal–Wallis-Test was performed to reveal significant differences in the mean values within an AMADEUS subscore for different raters
Rater 1 (mean ± SD) | Rater 2 (mean ± SD) | Rater 3 (mean ± SD) | Mean-Value (rater 1 to rater 3) | p-Value Rater 1 – Rater 3 | p-Value Rater 1 – Rater 2 | p-Value Rater 2 – Rater 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMADEUS total score | 52.64 ± 17.5 | 41.93 ± 13.31 | 56.01 ± 21.67 | 50.11 ± 14.23 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Score “defect area” | 18.09 ± 8.77 | 31.70 ± 4.14 | 24.16 ± 9.60 | 24.64 ± 5.69 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Score “depth” | 5.11 ± 5.23 | 9.32 ± 5.98 | 5.11 ± 6.17 | 6.46 ± 4.32 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Score “underlying structure” | 26.63 ± 8.39 | 26.59 ± 8.43 | 26.25 ± 4.87 | 27.09 ± 4.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
Score “BME” | 2.81 ± 4.52 | 5.00 ± 5.03 | 3.15 ± 4.67 | 3.67 ± 4.01 | 0.64 | 0.01 | 0.03 |