Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics

From: What is the effect of supervised rehabilitation regime vs. self-management instruction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? – a pilot study in two cohorts

  All patients  
Variable Supervised cohort Self-management cohort p
Patients, n (%) 23 (100) 22 (100)  
Gender , Female/Male (% female) 16/7 (69.6) 13/9 (59.1) 0.46
Age (yrs), mean (range) 66.6 (47–85) 65.3 (44–82) 0.71
BMI, mean (SD) 29.2 (4.93) 30.0 (6.50) 0.62
Per-op complications, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0)  
Pre-op total ROM, mean (SD) 109.8 (9.94) 115.2 (14.01) 0.14
Pre-op OKS, mean (95% CI) 22.4 (6.76) 22.8 (6.78) 0.85
Pre-op knee circumference, mean (95% CI) 45.8 (3.69) 45.3 (4.67) 0.70
  1. For normally distributed data, in accordance with Shapiro Wilk-test, kurtosis and skewness, mean values are presented, and p-value calculated using the unpaired T-test. P-values for categorical data is calculated using Pearson’s Chi-squared (χ2) test when appropriate
  2. Per-op Peroperative, Pre-op Preoperative, Per-op Per-operative, ROM Range of Motion, OKS Oxford Knee Score, SD Standard deviation, CI Confidence interval