Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality of Evidence according to GRADE [18]

From: Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review

 

Imprecision (n < 300)

Risk of bias (NOS < 6)

Conclusion

Oliver et al

N (n = 355)

N = 8

moderate-quality

Ayala et al

Y (n = 96)

N = 7

low-quality

LĂ³pez-Valenciano et al

Y (n = 132)

N = 7

low-quality

Rommers et al

N (n = 734)

N = 7

moderate-quality

Rossi et al

Y (n = 26)

Y = 5

very-low

Carey et al

Y (n = 133)

Y = 5

low-quality

Ruddy et al

N (n = 362)

N = 8

moderate-quality

Thornton et al

Y (n = 25)

Y = 5

very-low

McCullagh & Whitfort

Y (n = 39)

N = 7

very-low

Rodas et al

N (n = 363)

N = 7

moderate-quality

Whiteside et al

Y (n = 113)

N = 7

low-quality