Skip to main content

Table 6 Results of univariate analyses between the healed and failed groups

From: Effectiveness of measuring tension during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

  Healed group (n = 111) Failed group (n = 7) P-value
Age, years 66.1 ± 9.2 65.6 ± 12.9 .673
Sex, male: female 59: 52 5: 2 .581
Affected side, right: left 80: 31 5:2 .967
Prevalence of DM 15 ( +): 96 (-) 1 ( +): 6 (-) .952
SSP retraction, Boileau I/II/III 24/65/22 1/4/2 .993
ISP retraction, Boileau 0/I/II/III 77/16/14/4 1/4/0/2 .012*
Concomitant SSC lesion Lafosse type 0/I/II/III/IV 44/39/26/1/1 2/2/1/1/1 .006*
Concomitant LHB lesion modified Lafosse I/II/III/IV/V 56/25/12/12/6 3/2/0/0/2 .648
Pre AHI, mm 9.41 ± 1.85 9.35 ± 2.09 .862
Pre flex, deg 125.9 ± 34.0 139.3 ± 33.2 .194
Pre ER,deg 56.8 ± 17.1 56.4 ± 12.8 .758
Pre IR, spine level Th11.7 ± 2.9 Th12.5 ± 2.9 .348
Pre FD of SSC 61:38:7:5:0 4:1:0:0:0 .970
Pre FD of SSP 25:63:20:3:0 2:2:3:0:0 .683
Pre FD of ISP 58:44:8:1:0 3:1:1:1:1 .252
Pre GFDI 0.73 ± 0.51 1.24 ± 1.13 .154
Pre constant score 48.4 ± 14.8 54.0 ± 18.0 .502
Pre UCLA score 14.8 ± 4.3 17.0 ± 5.9 .360
Pre NRS 6.6 ± 1.8 6.8 ± 2.2 .914
  1. *Statistically significant between the healed and failed groups (p < 0.05)