Skip to main content

Table 3 Radiological measurements were compared between groups, and a significant difference was found in both Weber methods. The range is summarized between round brackets and the interquartile range between square brackets

From: Robotic-assisted Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty optimizes joint line restitution better than conventional surgery

  Conventional Robotic p
Weber 1 2.3 (0.9 to 5.6) [1.6 to 2.9] 1.5 (− 1.1 to 4.1) [0.6 to 2.0] 0.0025*
Weber 2 2.9 (0.1 to 5.2) [2.0 to 3.5] 1.1 (−2 to 4.2) [0.6 to 1.9] < 0.0000*
lacono 1.4 (0.2 to 4.7) [0.6 to 2.8] 1.2 (−1.3 to 3.1) [0.4 to 2.0] 0.1277*
Slope Before surgery 8.0 (4.6 to 12.5) [5.7 to 9.3] 8.2 (2.1 to 13.8) [6.5 to 9.9] 0.4754*
Slope After Surgery 5.7 (0.9 to 10.7) [4.8 to 8.9] 6.4 [0.6 to 14.7] (4.3 to 8.3) 0.9355*
Slope differential −1.4 (− 7.9 to 6.15) [− 4.3 to 0.8] −2.0 (− 7.4 to 4.6) [− 4.0 to 0.1] 0.8082*
Tibial resection 5.8 (3.5 to 8.9) [4.4 to 6.5] 6.2 (3.1 to 8.7) [5.3 to 7.1] 0.5237*
Tibial insert 8 (8 to 10) [8 to 9] 9 (8 to 11) [8 to 9] 0.3464**
  1. *non-parametric median test
  2. **Fisher exact test
\