Skip to main content

Table 2 MRI characteristics of the Studies included in this reviewa

From: Ramp lesions: a systematic review of MRI diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy

Author (Year)

Knee Position

Magnet Strength, T

Slice Thickness & MRI Sequence

RLs, %

Diagnostic Criteria

Arner (2017) [7]

Near full extension.

1.5

3 mm; Sequences NR.

14.4

High SI or separation between the posterior capsule and the PHMM.

DePhillipo (2017) [22]

NR.

3.0 or 1.5

NR; Sag. PDFS and T2FS.

16.6

High SI or separation between the posterior capsule and the PHMM.

Gulenc (2019) [28]

NR.

NR.

NR; Sagittal T2FS.

NR.

Separation between the capsule and the PHMM or tibial oedema.

Hatayama (2018) [32]b

Near full extension.

3.0 (N= 59)

2 mm; Sag. PDFS.

20.3

High SI or separation between the posterior capsule and the PHMM.

1.5 (N= 96)

NR.

37.8

Kim (2018) [38]

NR.

NR.

NR; Sag. PDFS.

25.6

Peripheral LT ≤ 4 mm of the meniscocapsular junction of the PHMM.

Kumar (2018) [40]

NR.

NR.

NR; Sag. PDFS and T2FS.

14.9

Oedema of the posterior medial tibial plateau.

Malatray (2018) [48]

Near full extension.

NR.

NR.

23.2

Peripheral LT of the meniscocapsular junction of the PHMM.

Yeo (2018) [86]

Neutral

3.0 or 1.5

3–4 mm; Sag. PDFS and T2FS.

9.0

High SI or separation between the posterior capsule and the PHMM.

  1. aLT longitudinal tear, MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging, NR not reported, PDFS Fat-suppressed Proton Density-weighted image, PHMM posterior horn of the Medial Meniscus, RLs proportion of ramp lesions, Sag Sagittal, SI fluid-like Signal Intensity, TFI time from injury, T2FS fat-suppressed T2-weighted image, T Tesla
  2. bHatayama et al. [32] used 2 cohorts to compare different magnet strengths in the diagnosis of ramp lesions