Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of UKA using PSI versus using conventional instrumentation for tibial resections

From: Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve tibial component coronal alignment for medial UKA compared to conventional instrumentation

 

PSI (n = 25)

Conventional (n = 22)

 

mean ± SD

n (%)

(min–max)

mean ± SD

n (%)

(min–max)

p value

Patient demographics

 Age (years)

65.1 ± 9.2

(46–86)

70.5 ± 9.2

(52–85)

0.050

 BMI (kg/m2)

27.3 ± 2.9

(21.3–32.2)

26.4 ± 3.6

(21–33)

0.365

 Women

6 (24%)

 

15 (68%)

 

0.002

 Right knee

15 (60%)

 

12 (55%)

 

0.709

Intraoperative measurements

 Tourniquet time (min)

58 ± 6

(45–75)

58 ± 9

(50–90)

0.55

Coronal alignment

 HKA angle (deg)

  Preoperative

173.8 ± 2.9

(167–178)

173.6 ± 3.0

(169–181)

0.844

  Postoperative

176.3 ± 2.8

(170–183)

177.1 ± 2.3

(171–181)

0.298

Net change

2.5 ± 1.5

(−1–5)

3.4 ± 2.4

(−4–6)

0.114

 mMPTA (deg)

  Preoperative

83.1 ± 2.0

(80–87)

84.7 ± 2.0

(81–88)

0.012

  Postoperative

85.6 ± 2.1

(80–89)

85.0 ± 3.6

(78–92)

0.509

Net change

2.4 ± 2.6

(−2–7)

0.3 ± 4.1

(−7–7)

0.045

  1. Abbreviations: PSI patient specific instruments, BMI body mass index, HKA hip-knee-ankle, mMPTA mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, min minutes, deg degrees