Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary of fatigue failure tests: maximal load, vertical & lateral stiffness, number of cycles (all values prior to failure) and failure types. The values of the first 5 groups have been retrieved from our previous studies and reported here for comparison purposes. All the differences were not statistically significant

From: Static and fatigue strength of a novel anatomically contoured implant compared to five current open-wedge high tibial osteotomy plates

Specimen

Maximal load [N]

Vertical

stiffness

KV [N/mm]

Lateral

stiffness

KL [N/mm]

Number of cycles

Failure types

TomoFix std. 3

1280

1350

2000

> 60000

2

TomoFix std. 4

1440

2000

2500

> 80000

2

TomoFix std. 5

1760

2500

2200

> 120000

2

 Mean:

1.5

1950

2233

> 86000

 

 SD ±:

0.2

577

252

30550

 

PEEKPower 3

1440

2000

2500

> 80000

2

PEEKPower 4

1280

1950

2140

> 60000

2

PEEKPower 5

1440

2785

2250

> 80000

2

 Mean:

1.4

2245

2297

> 73000

 

 SD ±:

0.1

468

184

11500

 

iBalance 3

1760

4000

3600

> 120000

2,4

iBalance 4

1760

3000

3400

> 120000

2

iBalance 5

1920

3000

2952

> 140000

2

iBalance 6

1760

3500

2500

> 120000

1,2

 Mean:

1.8

3375

3113

125000

 

 SD ±:

0.1

479

490

10000

 

TomoFix sm 3

1280

2200

2000

> 60000

2,3

TomoFix sm 4

1280

1750

1500

> 60000

2,3

TomoFix sm 5

1760

2000

2300

> 120000

1,2

 Mean:

1.4

1983

1933

> 80000

 

 SD ±:

0.3

184

330

28,300

 

Contour Lock 3

2400

2100

4400

> 200000

2

Contour Lock 4

1760

2300

2400

> 120000

2

Contour Lock 5

2400

2700

2600

> 200000

1,2,3

 Mean:

2.2

2367

3133

173000

 

 SD ±:

0.4

250

900

37700

 

Activmotion 3

2240

2500

6300

> 180000

2

Activmotion 4

2240

2500

2900

> 180000

2

Activmotion 5

1600

2500

4750

> 100000

2

Activmotion 6

1600

3100

5100

> 100000

2

 Mean:

1.9

2650

4763

140000

 

 SD ±:

0.3

260

1219

40000