Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Results of the t-test comparing the previous tested implants to the Activmotion implant. Mean values were compared. All p values were greater than 0.05

From: Static and fatigue strength of a novel anatomically contoured implant compared to five current open-wedge high tibial osteotomy plates

Groups Ultimate load [kN] Medial displ. at ultimate load [mm] Lateral displ. at ultimate load [mm] valgus-malrotation at ultimate load (°) Lateral stiffness at ultimate load [kN/mm]
TomoFix std. Mean: 5.3 1.2 4.7 2.8 1.1
SD ±: 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1
p value: > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05
PEEKPower Mean: 4.4 0.3 3.1 1.6 1.4
SD ±: 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1
p value: > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05
iBalance Mean: 5.5 0.3 1.9 0.9 3.1
SD ±: 0.2 0 0.4 0.4 0.7
p value: > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05
TomoFix sm Mean: 3.4 0.8 2.1 1.4 1.7
SD ±: 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1
p value: > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05
Contour Lock Mean: 3.6 0.5 4.1 2.2 0.9
SD ±: 0.5 0 0.2 0.1 0.1
p value: > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05