Skip to main content

Table 5 Results of the t-test comparing the previous tested implants to the Activmotion implant. Mean values were compared. All p values were greater than 0.05

From: Static and fatigue strength of a novel anatomically contoured implant compared to five current open-wedge high tibial osteotomy plates

Groups

Ultimate load [kN]

Medial displ. at ultimate load [mm]

Lateral displ. at ultimate load [mm]

valgus-malrotation at ultimate load (°)

Lateral stiffness at ultimate load [kN/mm]

TomoFix std.

Mean:

5.3

1.2

4.7

2.8

1.1

SD ±:

0.1

0.1

0.4

0.2

0.1

p value:

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

PEEKPower

Mean:

4.4

0.3

3.1

1.6

1.4

SD ±:

0.1

0.3

0.3

0.1

0.1

p value:

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

iBalance

Mean:

5.5

0.3

1.9

0.9

3.1

SD ±:

0.2

0

0.4

0.4

0.7

p value:

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

TomoFix sm

Mean:

3.4

0.8

2.1

1.4

1.7

SD ±:

0.3

0.2

0.4

0.1

0.1

p value:

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

Contour Lock

Mean:

3.6

0.5

4.1

2.2

0.9

SD ±:

0.5

0

0.2

0.1

0.1

p value:

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05

> 0.05