Skip to main content

Table 4 PTS comparison between injury and non-injury, dominant and non-dominant leg in ACL groupa

From: Does posterior tibial slope laterality exist? A matched cohort study between ACL-injured and non-injured knees

 

aPTS

p-value

mPTS

p-value

pPTS

p-value

Injury

12.0 ± 3.2 (5.4–23.4)

 < .01

9.0 ± 2.9 (1–18)

 < .01

7.5 ± 3.2 (0.1–17.8)

 < .01

Non-Injury

11.1 ± 3.0 (2.3–18.6)

8.0 ± 2.9 (0.1–17.2)

6.4 ± 3.2 (-4.2 -13.8)

Dominant

10.8 ± 3.3 (2.3–23.4)

 < .01

7.7 ± 2.8 (0.1–17.8)

 < .01

6.1 ± 3.2 (-4.2 -17.8)

 < .01

Non-Dominant

12.3 ± 3.1 (4.2–20.8)

9.3 ± 2.8 (1.9 -18)

7.7 ± 3.1 (0.2–14.6)

  1. Values in bold indicate stastical significance (P < .05)
  2. PTS posterior tibial slope, aPTS anterior PTS, mPTS middle PTS, pPTS posterior PTS, ACL anterior cruciate ligament, NS Not Significant
  3. aData are expressed as mean ± SD (range)