Skip to main content

Table 1 Participants’ characteristics at inclusion

From: Virtual reality simulation training improve diagnostic knee arthroscopy and meniscectomy skills: a prospective transfer validity study

 

Non-VR Group (n = 20)

VR Group (n = 16)

Total (n = 36)

P-Value

Age, years

25.3 [24–27]

25.4 [24–29]

25.3 [24–29]

0.77*

Sex

   

0.48

Men

13 (65%)

13 (81.2%)

26 (72.2%)

 

Women

7 (35%)

3 (18.8%)

10 (27.8%)

 

Dominant side

   

1

Right

17 (85%)

14 (87.5%)

31 (86.1%)

 

Left

3 (15%)

2 (12.5%)

5 (13.9%)

 

Ambidextrous

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 

Year of residency

   

1

PGY-1

10 (50%)

8 (50%)

18 (50%)

 

PGY-2

10 (50%)

8 (50%)

18 (50%)

 

Arthroscopic experience before inclusion

 Surgical assistant (< 100 arthroscopies)

   

0.91

  Yes

20 (100%)

15 (93.8%)

35 (97.2%)

 

  No (ie. never assisted arthroscopic surgery)

0 (0%)

1 (6.2%)

1 (2.8%)

 

 Principal operator (< 5 arthroscopies)

   

0.96

  Yes

5 (25%)

3 (18.8%)

8 (22.2%)

 

  No (ie. never practiced arthroscopy)

15 (75%)

13 (81.2%)

28 (77.8%)

 

 Arthroscopic training before inclusion

   

0.95

  Yes (Cadaveric Model)

3 (15%)

3 (18.8%)

6 (16.7%)

 

  Yes (1 h, Bench-top Model)

3 (15%)

2 (13.2%)

5 (13.9%)

 

  No

14 (70%)

11 (68.8%)

25(69.4%)

 

 VR training before inclusion

   

0.94

  Yes

6 (30%)

5 (31.2%)

11 (30.6%)

 

No

14 (70%)

11 (68.8%)

25 (69.4%)

 

VR arthroscopic simulator score at inclusion

125 [116–134]

123 [111–135]

124 [113–135]

0.14*

  1. Data are reported as median [interquartile range] or numbers (percentage)
  2. *Independent-samples t-test
  3. Pearson’s chi-square test